Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01793
Original file (PD-2014-01793.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01793
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150127
SEPARATION DATE: 20030618


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (M1 Armor Crewmember) medically separated for bipolar II disorder. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent S3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The behavioral health condition, characterized as “biopolar (sic) II disorder, most recent episode hypomanic,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated bipolar disorder, as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20020415
 VA – 6 years post-separation
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bipolar II Disorder 9432 10% No VA Entry
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 2
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20080724 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).
*There is no C&P exam for behavioral health; however, there are C&P exams for Joints and Feet, dated 20080630.





ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bipolar II Disorder. According to the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) the CI sought care in March 2002 for depressive symptoms in the context of occupational and marital problems and was subsequently diagnosed with bipolar II disorder in April 2002. Symptoms included irritability, anxiety, mood swings and pressured speech. He was treated as an outpatient with medication requiring dose adjustments. By mid-October 2002 his symptoms stabilized with no evidence of recurrent symptoms. At the time of the MEB NARSUM on 10 March 2003, he remained on medication without evidence of recurrent symptoms. At the time of MEB NARSUM examination, the CI reported feeling wired but the remainder of the examination was normal. The CI was well groomed and appropriately dressed in uniform, cooperative and interactive with the examiner. His speech was normal, with normal rate, rhythm, tone and volume. Thought processes were normal (linear, logical, goal directed) and without evidence of suicidal or homicidal thoughts, delusions, hallucinations, or paranoia. There was no evidence of ongoing manic behavior. Cognitive functioning was considered intact. The examiner assessed the civilian social and industrial impairment as mild and assigned a Global Assessment of Functioning of 65, denoting some mild symptoms or some difficulty in occupational functioning but generally functioning pretty well. There are no VA examinations close to the time of separation. The CI first filed a claim with the VA for disability compensation in 2008 but not for his mental health condition.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the bipolar II disorder 10% (9432-bipolar disorder), mild. There is no service-connected VA rating for a mental health condition within 5 years of separation. The evidence of the MEB NARSUM indicated that symptoms were controlled with medication and that social and occupational functioning was mildly impaired. The Board did not find sufficient evidence to support the next higher rating (30%). The condition did not require any emergency room visits or hospitalizations and at the time of the MEB NARSUM examination there were no symptoms present that would imply a level of impairment at the 30% level (such as depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, panic attacks, memory loss, or sleep impairment. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the bipolar II disorder condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the bipolar II disorder condition and IAW VASRD §4.130, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.







The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140425, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record



                           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                    President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150009532 (PD201401793)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02021

    Original file (PD-2013-02021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-02021 BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20150505 The Board gives consideration to VA evidence,particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01452

    Original file (PD-2013-01452.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The military pharmacy medication record reflected prescriptions for the psychiatric medication up to the time of the MEB in May 2004.The medical hold commander’s comments signed 20 May 2004 noted the CI’s S3 physical profile and stated that the CI was not working in his primary military occupational service but was working in the administrative section of the military traffic management center with satisfactory duty performance.VA examinations dated 30 August 2004 and 2 September 2004 (a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00873

    Original file (PD-2014-00873.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left knee pain,” and “bipolar II disorder” as unfitting, rated 10% each, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the patellofemoral syndrome, left knee condition as 5014...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00445

    Original file (PD2012 00445.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bipolar condition, characterized as bipolar disorder, Type I was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated bipolar disorder as unfitting, rated 30%,with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), and placed the CI on the TDRL.After 24 months on TDRL, a PEB adjudicated bipolar I disorder as unfitting, rating it 10% with application of the VASRD. On mental status...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | pd2012-00001

    Original file (pd2012-00001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI improved on two medications (Seroquel and Depakote) and the hospital discharge GAF was 61-70, in the mild symptom range with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, single episode, manic. In the matter of the bipolar disorder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 30% coded 9432 IAW VASRD §4.130. 3 PD1200001 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02086

    Original file (PD-2013-02086.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining conditions were determined to be Category III, not separately unfitting and not compensable or ratable.The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB) which found the bipolar Disorder II as unfitting, rated at 10%, with application of DODI 1332.39, noting the condition did not exist prior to service. The Board considered the commander’s statement of essentially no current duty impairment, with the history of hospitalization, recurrent depressive episodes, non-judicial punishment,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01103

    Original file (PD2011-01103.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the Type II bipolar disorder condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), dated 23 January 2009, notes that the CI initially presented to mental health services on 15 April 2008, 14 months prior to separation, reporting decreased mood, decreased energy, and increased irritability in the context of ongoing problems with work. It noted that there was a general...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02162

    Original file (PD-2013-02162.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating for the unfitting bipolar II disorder condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The evidence supports that the correct diagnosis was bipolar II disorder and that application of VASRD §4.129 was not warranted. When he took his medications, he got along with his wife and young children, and had no sleep impairment.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01926

    Original file (PD-2014-01926.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The “bipolar II disorder” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bipolar II disorder…mild”as unfitting, rated 10%, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00120

    Original file (PD2013 00120.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The bipolar disorder II and the meniscus tear conditions, characterized as “bipolar type II disorder” and “non-displaced tear, lateral meniscus, right knee,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded three other conditions (see rating chart below) for PEB adjudication.The PEB adjudicated “bipolar disorder type II”and “non-displaced meniscus tear, lateral, right knee”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%.The remaining conditions were...