Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01296
Original file (PD-2014-01296.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01296
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150505
SEPARATION DATE: 20041021


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard E-5 (Infantryman) medically separated for low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic low back pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (major depressive disorder [MDD], single episode) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic subjective low back pain, without neurologic abnormality as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MDD condition was determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION: “I was only rated for my lower back, which prevented me from performing all of my duties as an Infantry Soldier. But the more severe issue with my left TMJ was not considered. Also, I tried very hard to get a RTD (Return to Duty) . I pushed myself and down-played my pain and tried to convince the medical staff that I would be able to continue to serve. Enclosed is my VA rating info.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.









RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20040922
VA* - (9 Days Pre-Separation)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Subjective Low Back Pain, Without Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5237 10% Lumbar Strain 5237 20% 20041012
Other x 1 (Not In Scope)
Other x 7
RATING: 10%
RATING: 70%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 41220 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) ) .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Pain Condition. The CI reported that on 25 April 2003, while doing a ruck march, he fell on his left knee with a 70-pound ruck on his back. He developed LBP and shooting pain down the posterior thigh and lateral foot with numbness. Magnetic resonance imaging showed mild disk desiccation, loss of disk space height and broad based disk bulging at L4-5 and L5-S1. He deployed to Iraq and participated in physical therapy and received medications but the pain became so severe that he was medically evacuated to Germany and then to the United States. He was treated with steroid injections and a TENS unit, but LBP persisted.

At the narrative summary, dated 28 June 2004, (performed 4 months prior to separation), the CI reported he had intermittent radiating pain in the left buttocks. He reported erectile dysfunction which did not appear to be a function of neurologic consequences from the back pain since erection was possible with medication. Physical exam showed normal gait and posture. He had active range-of-motion (ROM), demonstrating forward flexion of 50 degrees (normal 90), combined 155 degrees (normal 240) with painful motion. Neurologic and sensory exams were intact. Motor strength was 5/5 bilaterally and equal with normal bulk and tone. He could walk on his heels and toes.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam on 14 October 2004 (performed a week prior to separation), the CI reported constant pain in the lower back that traveled to the left leg. The pain was burning and sharp with a level of 5 out of 10 could be spontaneous or due to physical activity. Rest and medication relieved it. The CI reported incapacitating episodes up to 6 times per year, lasting for 4 days. In the previous year, there were 6 incidents of incapacitation for a total of 16 days and he lost time from work. He took medication for impotence that helped sometimes. The physical exam showed a normal gait and no evidence of muscle spasm or radiating pain on movement. There was tenderness in the lower back and positive straight leg raising bilaterally (test for radiating symptoms). ROM was limited to forward flexion of 45 degrees and combined 120 degrees with no ROM change on repetition. There was no ankyloses of the spine and no evidence of intervertebral disc syndrome of the lumbar spine. Motor and sensory function was normal. Reflexes of the knee and ankle jerks were 1+ bilaterally.

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 10% rating under an analogous 5237 code (lumbosacral strain), while the VA rated the condition 20%, also coded 5237. The Board agreed that the limitation of flexion in evidence (both MEB and VA) supported a 20% rating, but no higher, for forward flexion greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees. Although the CI reported incapacitating episodes, there was no documentation of periods of physician prescribed bed rest for any rating under VASRD code 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the chronic low back pain condition.

The Board finally deliberated whether an additional disability was justified for peripheral nerve impairment. The CI reported intermittent radiating pain in the lower back that traveled to the left leg. However, there were no complaints of muscle problems, and objective peripheral nerve, muscle strength, and reflex testing was normal. Pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching is rated under the general formula for the spine and was considered in the spine rating above. The presence of functional impairment with a direct impact on fitness is the key determinant in the Board’s decision to recommend any condition for rating as additionally unfitting. There was insufficient evidence in this case of functional impairment attributable to peripheral neuropathy that adversely impacted duty performance. The Board therefore concluded that no peripheral nerve (radiculopathy) condition could be recommended for additional disability rating.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5243 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Low Back Pain 5299-5237 20%
COMBINED
20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140312, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record









XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review



SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150013434 (PD201401296)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                    Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                    (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01761

    Original file (PD-2014-01761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The narrative summary (NARSUM) on 8 November 2005 (5 months prior to separation) reported that there was no improvement in the “low back pain with right leg radiculopathy.” Physical exam showed no evidence of non-physiologic pain.Goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) testing...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470

    Original file (PD 2014 00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02240

    Original file (PD-2013-02240.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Low Back and Left Leg Pain Condition. Despite additional treatment the CI continued to report primarily back pain with some numbness/tingling to the left thigh area, but was noted to have good strength, sensation and reflexes.A repeat myelogram did not indicate any further nerve compression and no further surgical intervention was recommended.At the MEB examination performed on 9 March 2005, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic pain increased by activity and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01560

    Original file (PD-2013-01560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The examiner stated, “He could full forward bend, side bend 25 degrees right and left [normal 30], extend 20 degrees [normal 30].” The medical records documented lower extremity peripheral nerve sensory deficits attributed to the CI’s diabetes. Following this exam, as noted above, the VA granted service-connection for the back condition with a 10% rating effective...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02665

    Original file (PD-2013-02665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00947

    Original file (PD 2012 00947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200947 SEPARATION DATE: 20040105 BOARD DATE: 20130307 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (52C10/Air Condition Technician), medically separated for “chronic low back pain due to lumbar disc disease, without neurologic abnormality.” Early in 2002 he experienced sudden...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00037

    Original file (PD-2014-00037.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The VA exam was closest to the date of separation and documented worsened pain-limited ROM than the MEB exam. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01855

    Original file (PD-2014-01855.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PEB rated the chronic neck pain 0%, coded 5237 (cervical strain) and the VA rated it 20%.The Board considered that the CI was noted to have painful, mildly limited cervical ROM without noted muscle spasm at the MEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01470

    Original file (PD-2013-01470.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain, w/o Neurologic Abnormality5299-523710%Lumbar Disc Bulge L4-L5523740%20050110Peripheral Neuropathy, LLE852010%20050110Peripheral Neuropathy, RLE852010%20050110Asthma6602---%Mild Seasonal AsthmaNSC20041227Other x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 420041227 Combined: 10%Combined: 50%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050226(most proximate to date of separation)Increased to 60% on 20050110 for bilateral factor of...