Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01560
Original file (PD-2013-01560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01560
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141210
SEPARATION DATE: 20040413


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve E-4 (Motor Transport Operator) medically separated for low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated his back as unfitting and rated it at 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I [have] degenerative-joint-disease of the lumbar spine.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040126
 VA (Not Service Connected)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain, Without Neurological Abnormality 5299-5237 10% Degenerative Joint Disease of the Lumbar Spine … 5243 NSC* ~2001*
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 9
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 61102 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).
*VARD dated 20120316 added lumbar spine 10% rating (5003-5242) effective 20040414.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Back Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM), written 5 months prior to separation, noted that the CI had been complaining of LBP for a number of years, with gradual insidious onset, and without any specific history of trauma. The CI had been followed by the VA for approximately 2 years for his back pain with a number of physical therapies. The symptoms were primarily in his lower back with no radiating pain or symptoms into his legs, and without any bowel or bladder problems. Prior magnetic resonance imaging had multiple demonstrated disc herniations in the lower back with moderate narrowing of the spinal canal and severe narrowing of the neural foramen (nerve outlet space) at L5-S1. At the NARSUM exam the CI had no muscle atrophy below the waist, normal reflexes, normal gait, and a normal curve of the lower back. The examiner stated, “He could full forward bend, side bend 25 degrees right and left [normal 30], extend 20 degrees [normal 30].” The medical records documented lower extremity peripheral nerve sensory deficits attributed to the CI’s diabetes.

The VA did not service-connect the LBP condition proximate to separation and there was no pre-separation VA exam. VA clinical notes , approximately 17 months prior to separation, indicated the CI was “still referring LBP associated to bilateral leg weakness and numbness” and noted mild left lower leg (gastrocnemius) atrophy, full active range-of-motion (ROM) of the back, and grossly normal strength and sensation of both legs. At a VA Compensation and Pension exam over 4 years after separation, the CI reported flare-ups of his back pain every 1 to 2 months that lasted 3 to 7 days and that he used a cane and was unable to walk more than a few yards . He had not had any physician prescribed bed rest in the last year. On examination, there was tenderness and spasm of the lower back muscles , pain with motion, symmetric spine without abnormal curvature, and there was slight (4/5) decrease in some left ankle and great toe muscles, no muscle atrophy, and normal sensation. Gait and ROMs were normal (flexion from 0 to 90 degrees and lateral flexions and rotations from 0 to 30 degrees ) . Following this exam, a s noted above, the VA granted service - connection for the back condition with a 10% rating effective back to the day after separation .

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The only ratable examination of the spine done near the time of separation was the NARSUM exam, which the PEB rated at 10%. Remote from separation, the VA reviewed the service treatment record (and additional records) and also rated the back condition at 10%. While the NARSUM examination did not comply fully with VA examination standards, the Board found it sufficient to determine a valid disability rating. The exam revealed a decrease in the combined ROM (e.g., extension 20 degrees, while normal is 30 degrees), which warranted a disability rating of 10% for “combined range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 120⁰ but not greater than 235⁰.” The annotation of “full forward bend” did not support a higher rating for limitation of forward flexion. The exam (and the record proximate to separation) did not support a higher rating as there was no evidence that the combined ROM of the thoracolumbar spine was less than 130 degrees, of muscle spasm or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour, or physician-prescribed bed rest having a total duration of at least 2 weeks. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the back condition.

The Board additionally considered if the neurologic symptoms of the lower extremities warranted an additional disability rating under a peripheral nerve code. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating (IAW §4.71a). The 17 month prior to separation note of complaints of bilateral leg weakness and numbness with left lower leg atrophy was noted; however, there was no motor or peripheral nerve deficit noted on the NARSUM or MEB exam. Diabetic neuropathy (sensory changes) of both legs was noted in the treatment records, but was not noted on the profile or commander’s statement. The record did not document significant duty impairment from any neurologic condition of the lower legs which could be attributed to the lower back condition proximate to separation. Board members agreed that the requisite link of the remaining symptoms with functional impairment was not in evidence.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication, and no ratable peripheral nerve condition. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130420, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150007602 (PD201301560)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01211

    Original file (PD2013 01211.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20030511Based on VA and Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain, Without Neurologic Abnormality5299-529510%Chronic LBP w/DDD523710%STR & 20040818Muscle Atrophy Right Thigh and Right Leg, Etiology UndeterminedNot UnfittingRight Lower Extremity Atrophy….w/LBP w/DDD852110%STROther x 1 (Within Scope)Depression/Insomnia9499-9434NSC*STROther x 4 NSC Combined: 10%Combined: 20%*Derived from VA Rating Decision...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01210

    Original file (PD 2014 01210.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20050119VA - (1Mo. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00130

    Original file (PD 2014 00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board agreed that the evidence in the record at both the MEB and C&P examinations supported the 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) for painful limited arm motion that did not meet the threshold compensable rating of 20% for “limited motion at shoulder level.” Board practice when rating ascode 5201 has considered 90 degrees of abduction or flexion “shoulder level.” There was no evidence in record of any other ratable impairment of the shoulder or incapacitating episodesallow for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00213

    Original file (PD-2014-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP523710%Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Syndrome524310%20070227S1 Radiculopathy Left Lower Extremity5243-852010%20070227Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00453

    Original file (PD-2014-00453.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee ROM (Degrees)VA C&P ~9.5 Mos. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01615

    Original file (PD2012 01615.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the LBP condition coded as 5299-5295. Physical Disability Board of Review I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01761

    Original file (PD-2014-01761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The narrative summary (NARSUM) on 8 November 2005 (5 months prior to separation) reported that there was no improvement in the “low back pain with right leg radiculopathy.” Physical exam showed no evidence of non-physiologic pain.Goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) testing...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793

    Original file (PD2013 00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...