Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01180
Original file (PD-2014-01180.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01180
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141028
SEPARATION DATE: 20090420


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (21B/Combat Engineer) medically separated for back condition. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Back pain was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine as unfitting rated 10% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I cannot run/jump/walk for long periods of time. Always in back pain. Effects everyday things.” (continued) “I would like to say my back injury has effected my life in so many ways. I use to work out every day. Run 2-3 miles a day. Had the fastest PT 2 mile run in my unit. Now I can’t walk 1 mile let alone run anywhere. Exercise has become” (continue) “a pain for me. To find exercises I can do without being in pain has made me struggle to find the drive to keep in shape. Trustfully, I gave VP… I don’t have the money to go to the gym to get a personal trainer to help motivate me.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below. Any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20090107
 VA* - (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Degenerative Arthritis, Lumbar Spine 5242 10% Posterior Disc Protrusion, L5-S1 5243 20% 20090220
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 1
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090520 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS))


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his medical condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

Degenerative Arthritis of the Lumbar Spine. The CI experienced the insidious onset of low back pain during his deployment in August 2007. He was able to complete his rotation and upon return state-side he was evaluated and treated by physical therapy (PT). Plain film X-rays for the lumbar spine were normal and he didn’t respond to PT, non-steroidal medications (NSAIDS) muscle relaxers and duty restriction. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study revealed a “very small broad-based posterior disk protrusion at the LS-S1 level, without central canal stenosis or neural foraminal narrowing. The MRI of the lumbar spine is otherwise normal.” He was referred for orthopedic evaluation and did not desire surgical intervention. At the MEB narrative summary examination dated approximately 4 months prior to separation; the CI reported focal pain at L2 through L4 levels which radiated down the midline of his back. There was no radiation to his legs, no paraesthesias, no weakness and no bowel or bladder control problems. He endorsed flare-ups of his pain which involved local increase in pain, from 2/10 and increased up to 8/10, at least twice per week. The pertinent physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, performed approximately 2 months after separation, the CI reported that he used conservative treatment of rest, NSAIDS and PT. These treatment modalities helped with his multiple musculoskeletal discomforts but did not resolve them. His spine pain did not preclude him from walking extended distances, but often caused discomfort either during or following the event. There was no unsteadiness and he had not been placed on strict bed rest by a physician for incapacitating spine pain over a period of 12 months.

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.
invalid font number 31502
Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) DD 2808 8 Mo. Pre-Sep NARSUM 4 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P 2 Mo. Pre-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) F ull ROM 70 60
Combined (240) Full ROM 210 210
Comment Normal gait; Pos. painful motion; Neg. straight leg raise (SLR); Normal strength, reflexes & sensation Normal gait; Pos. painful motion; No spasm; Neg. SLR; Normal strength, reflexes & sensation Normal gait; Neg. SLR; Pos. tenderness to palpation; Normal strength, reflexes & sensation
§4.71a Rating 10%* 10 % (PEB 10%) 20 % (VA 20%)
invalid font number 31502 * invalid font number 31502 IAW §4.59 (p invalid font number 31502 ainful motion)

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB applied VASRD code 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) and rated it 10% specifically citing VASRD rating principles. The VA applied code 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome) and rated it 20% based on the documented ROM. IAW the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine the evidence supports that the CI had a herniated disc of the lumbar spine; however, he did not manifest symptoms of intervertebral disc syndrome and had no periods of incapacitation due to his back pain. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI's pain symptoms with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease. Board members agree that code 5242, utilized by the PEB, is the most appropriate code in this case. The Board also determined the VA C&P exam as the most probative exam for its rating recommendation based on its closer proximity to separation. As applied by the VA, the CI’s ROMs, documented 2 months prior to separation and were consistent with a 20% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the degenerative arthritis, lumbar spine condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the degenerative arthritis, lumbar spine condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Degenerative Arthritis, Lumbar Spine 5242 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140224, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150007661 (PD201401180)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00453

    Original file (PD-2014-00453.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee ROM (Degrees)VA C&P ~9.5 Mos. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00826

    Original file (PD2013 00826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation. Contended PEB Conditions : The Board noted that no MH condition was referred into the DES. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02384

    Original file (PD-2013-02384.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Back Pain Due To Lumbar DDD/Extruded Discs Condition . Pre-SepVA C&P 16 Days Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal)65Used ROM’s from PT exam60Combined (240)210210CommentPos. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01209

    Original file (PD-2013-01209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was medically boarded out of the Army at this time.” The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, without Significant Neurologic Abnormality5299-523720%Thoracic Spondylosis to include Dextroscoliosis524240%20040810Other x 0 (Not In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00161

    Original file (PD2013 00161.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ratings for the unfitting neck and back conditions are addressed below. The PT note on 16March 2007, 3 months prior to separation recorded bubble inclinometer ROM without specification of the method used, or normal values, at flexion 21 degrees, and extension 9 degrees with pain.The MEB NARSUM exam on 23 April 2007, approximately2 months prior to separation, documented that the CI’s LBP symptoms had slowly worsened and that he had undergone rest, activity modification, anti-inflammatory...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01924

    Original file (PD 2014 01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20080711VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Lumbar DDD523710%Lumbar DDD with Radiculopathy524220%STROther X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090124 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. A...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02571

    Original file (PD-2013-02571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At a pain managementevaluation on 11 March 2005 the CI reported no upper extremity symptoms and there was reduced cervical ROM with normal strength and TTP of the cervical spine (facet pain), with positive evidence of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01553

    Original file (PD-2013-01553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back and left shoulder conditions, characterized as “left shoulder rotator cuff tear, status post(s/p) repair and back pain secondary to T12 compression fracture” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

    Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01529

    Original file (PD2012 01529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The brain trauma and incontinence conditionswere not identified by the MEB or PEB and thus,they are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.These and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the BCMR. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: Physical Disability Board of Review