Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01209
Original file (PD-2013-01209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   C ASE: PD - 20 1 3 - 0 1209
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 2015 0205
Separation Date: 2004040 3


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (45G/Fire Control Systems Repairer) medically separated for a back condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P3/L3/U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “mid-thoracic back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain, without significant neurologic abnormality,” as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “In 2004 we were the first crew to start getting medically boarded out after the Mar 2003 Iraq invasion and we weren’t helped as the soldiers our now. I did not say much about my PTSD due to fear of what jobs I would miss out of after leaving the Army. I’m 80% disabled in the VA. When we were (released) medically boarded out we did not even know too much about the VA and were scared to say anything about all of our issues due to fearing not being able to get a job afterwards. I was medically boarded out of the Army at this time.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.

 The additional documents submitted by the CI did not have any bearing on the outcome of this case. The evidence is for a contended condition (PTSD) which was not implicated by the PEB or MEB and therefore not in scope. The applicant applied on a DD F m 249 not a DD F m 149 (for MH review) and will have to apply directly to the BCMR as stated below in the S cope section above , to have this condition considered as an “unfitting” condition.

RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20040116
 VA* - (~4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain, without Significant Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5237 20% Thoracic Spondylosis to include Dextroscoliosis 5242 40% 20040810
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 2
RATING: 20%
 RATING: 50%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20041028 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])
invalid font number 31502

ANALYSIS SUMMARY :
Chronic Back Pain, without Significant Neurologic Abnormality Condition . The CI developed lower thoracic spine pain in late 1999 without an identifiable injury . Initially, the pain waxed and waned with short periods of being pain free. During an exacerbation, the CI would present to sick call and be given a profile, placed on a non-st eroidal anti-inflammatory drug with occasional prescriptions with anti-spasmodics . A bone s can of the mid to lower thoracic back was normal. The thoracic spine magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) showed minor degenerative changes at T7- 8, T10-11 and T11/12. The CI continued with chronic thoracic spine pain and was followed by Primary Care. The Primary Care provider documented spasm in the mid back with physical exam findings of an antalgic gait and r ight sided paraspinal muscle spasms . A repeat thoracic spine MRI documented a slight left lateral bulging compressing the thecal sac. Yet a nother thoracic spine MRI done for chronic T7-8 pain , demonstrated mild disc narrowing. The MEB narrative summary exam a ccomplished a pproximately 5 months prior to separation documented mid thoracic spine pain that was exacerbated by deployment to Iraq. The CI reported that while deployed, he had weakness in both legs; however, these symptoms resolved spontaneously. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 4 months after separation documented constant aching, crushing, sharp pain located in the middle of his back down to the toes. The CI lost approximately 5 months from work. The thoracic spine X-ray showed mild dextroscoliosis and minimal diffuse thoracic spondylosis. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

To support a recommendation for an additional peripheral nerve rating at separation, B oard precedent requires a functional impairment be tied to fitness . The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The sensory component in this case ha d no functional implications. The motor impairment was relatively minor and could not be linked to significant physical impairment. The CI had leg weakness while deployed, however these symptoms were no longer present at the time of the M E B exam. Since no evidence of functional impairment exist ed in this case, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment.

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 PT ~4 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~4 Mos. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 50 30
Combined (240) - 105
Comment The PEB used the passive ROM of 55 degrees documented on this exam for rating Antalgic gait; Pos. painful motion & Deluca criteria; Pos. SLR bilaterally; Normal strength, sensation & reflexes
§4.71a Rating 20% (PEB 20%) 40% (VA 40%)
invalid font number 31502 The Board direct invalid font number 31502 ed invalid font number 31502 attenti invalid font number 31502 on to its rating recommendation invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 based on the above evidence invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The PEB coded the invalid font number 31502 chronic back pain 5299 analogous to 5237 invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 without invalid font number 31502 significant neurologic abnormality invalid font number 31502 condition invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and rated invalid font number 31502 the condition at invalid font number 31502 20%. The VA coded the invalid font number 31502 thoracic spondylosis to include dextroscoliosis invalid font number 31502 condition as 5242 invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 Degenerative arthritis of the spine invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 and rated at 40%. invalid font number 31502 The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine invalid font number 31502 considers the CI’s invalid font number 31502 condition invalid font number 31502 “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease invalid font number 31502 . ” invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The Board invalid font number 31502 considered the probative value of each exam on which to base its rating recommendation. invalid font number 31502 The MEB examiner reference invalid font number 31502 d invalid font number 31502 the use of invalid font number 31502 formal goniometric invalid font number 31502 PT invalid font number 31502 ROMs invalid font number 31502 which invalid font number 31502 documented invalid font number 31502 active flexion invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 50 degrees at invalid font number 31502 4 invalid font number 31502 months prior to separation invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 T invalid font number 31502 he VA exam ROM’s were invalid font number 31502 accomplished invalid font number 31502 4 invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 months after separation invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and invalid font number 31502 noted forward flexion of 30 degrees. invalid font number 31502 The invalid font number 31502 PT invalid font number 31502 exam met the 20% rating criteria “ invalid font number 31502 f invalid font number 31502 orward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 ” A dditionally, there was no clear- cut evidence of injury (VASRD §4.41, History of Injury) or significant pathologic findings that would logically explain a 40% disability rating at the time of separation . invalid font number 31502 After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the invalid font number 31502 chronic back pain, without significant neurologic abnormality condition invalid font number 31502 .


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic back pain, without significant neurologic abnormality condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

invalid font number 31502
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130907 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record




                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150009881 (PD201301209)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00792

    Original file (PD2012 00792.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Thoracic Back Pain Condition . The Board deliberated the rating of the thoracic BP condition and is required to provide a rating recommendation based on the VASRD rating guidelines in effect at the time of the CI’s date of separation and the Board did so.The Board considered the evidence, at the time of separation, supported the CI having localized thoracic BP with normal ROM, muscle strength, sensation and reflexes. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01522

    Original file (PD-2013-01522.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01693

    Original file (PD-2014-01693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20060316VA - (3 Mos. Chronic Upper Back Pain Condition . The CI was seen in pain managementprior to deploying for pain medications due to the chronic clavicle and shoulder pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00261

    Original file (PD-2014-00261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Herniated Disc L4-5 with DDD524320%Lumbar Spine Strain523740%20070829Sciatic Nerve with L1-4 RL Radiculopathy852020%20070829Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x920070829 Combined: 20%Combined: 90%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20071023 (most proximate to date of separation) invalid font number 31502 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01239

    Original file (PD2012 01239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the VA Compensation and Pension examination dated 3 June 2004, approximately 4months after separation, the CI reported a chronic low-grade pain in the lower thoracic region, 3 on a scale of 10. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAFPresident Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02385

    Original file (PD-2014-02385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain5299-523710%Mild Levoscoliotic Curvature with Lumbago5299-523710%20080829Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 10%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20081027 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Low Back Pain (LBP) . RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01431

    Original file (PD-2013-01431.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20040225VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Subjective Back Pain with L4-5 Spondylolisthesis523910%Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) and Spondylolisthesis5239-523540%STRChronic Arthritis Right Knee5003---%Arthritis, Right Knee5010-525910%STROther x0 (Not in Scope)Other x0 (Not in Scope) Combined: 10%Combined: 50%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02617

    Original file (PD-2013-02617.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20090327 The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02308

    Original file (PD-2013-02308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He rated his pain at 4/10. Deluca criteria§4.71a Rating10%* (PEB 10%)10% (VA 10%) invalid font number 31502 *IAW VASRD §4.59, Painful motion invalid font number 31502 The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic LBP secondary to L5-S1 HNP without neurologic deficit condition 5243 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) and rated at 10%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01040

    Original file (PD-2014-01040.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PT performed ROMs for the MEB exam and noted an abnormal spine motion. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.