Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01553
Original file (PD-2013-01553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD - 2013 - 01553
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0206
Separation Date: 20040813


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve E-4 ( M otor Transport Operator) medically separated for left shoulder pain and back pain. The conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3/L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back and left shoulder conditions, characterized as “left shoulder rotator cuff tear, status post ( s / p ) repair and back pain secondary to T12 compression fracture” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (anxiety disorder not otherwise specified and hypercholesterolemia [ sic ]) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated low back pain (LBP) and left shoulder pain as unfitting rated 10% and 0% , respectively , with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) . The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “The disability should have been rated higher due to the disability becoming more painful between the time of discovery, the time of board and the time of discharge.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.

invalid font number 31502


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service Admin PEB – Dated 20040813
 VA - (~1.5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low Back Pain (LBP) with a History of Injury to T12 5299-5235 10% Residuals of Compression Fracture T12 5235 10% 20040929
Left Shoulder Pain s/p Repair of Rotator Cuff 5099-5003 0% s/p Left Rotator Cuff Tear with Residuals 5203* Deferred
Other x2 (Not In Scope)
 Other x0
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20041021 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])
*VARD dated 20070920 changed the code to 5019 and rated the left shoulder 10% effective the day after DOS


ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

 LBP with a History of Injury to T12 Condition . The CI sustained a T12 compression fracture on 23 September 1988 . He was taken for a back evaluation and the examiner diagnosed a T12 compression fracture. The CI was placed on light duty and towards the end of January 1989; he went on terminal leave and was sent to CONUS. He joined the Army National Guard in 1995 as the back stopped bothering him; however he could not pass the physical training test. He separated in 1998 and reenlisted in the Guard in April 2000 and noted that his back was fine. He stil l had problems with the P T test ; however , his back was “OK” when he deployed. He had recurring back pain and was evaluated. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 months prior to separation documented intermittent, chronic back pain exacerbated by his weight gain of 20 pounds. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. A pproximately 5 months prior to separation t he p hysical t herapist (PT) performed range-of-motion ( ROM ) measurements for the MEB. The PT physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. Two months prior to separation, a lumbar spine X -ray showed severe degenerative changes of L4-5 and L 5-S1 and no definitive comp ression fracture was noted. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam accomplished approximately a month after separation documented that the back stiffness had worsening with daily pain. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. Five months after separation, a lumbar spine X -ray showed very m ild degenerative changes and mild chronic T12 compression.

There were two ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.
Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB ~ 5. 5 Mos. Pre Sep PT ~ 5. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 1. 5 Mo s . Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) No ROM’s 90 90
Combined (240) - 235 240
Comment Normal gait; Pos. tender ness to palpation; Neg. straight leg raise - Normal gait; No spasm; Normal strength & reflexes; “ Repetitive motion significant for increased symptoms ”
§4.71a Rating 10% - 10 %
invalid font number 31502
The Board direct ed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the LBP with a history of injury to T12 condition as 5299 analogous to 5235 ( Vertebral fracture or dislocation ) and rated at 10%. The VA coded as 5235 ( residuals of compression fracture ) also rated at 10%. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease . ” All probative exams document that t he CI met the 10% rating criteria for “localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait . ” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the LBP with a history of injury to T12 condition.

Left Shoulder Pain s/p Repair of Rotator Cuff and Repair Condition : The CI sustained a left shoulder injury while deployed to Kuwait when he was climbing down a truck ladder, fell and landed on his left upper extremity with his arm behind him. The CI was evaluated and X -rays were done , which were normal. A left shoulder magnetic resonance imaging showed a complete tear of the supraspinatus tendon. The CI underwent left rotator cuff repair surgery on 9 May 2003. The Orthopedist noted limited ROM secondary to pain and discomfort. The PT documented that the ROM was within functional limits but pain was still 4/10. The MEB NARSUM exam approximately 5 months prior to separation documented chronic left shoulder pain made worse by weather changes. The physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

Left Shoulder ROM(Degrees) MEB ~ 5. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep PT ~ 5. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 1. 5 Mo 5 . Post-Sep
Flexion (180 Normal) 160 - 145
Abduction (180) 160 165 145
Comments Pos. painful motion; No instability; Normal strength - Pos. painful motion, tenderness & crepitus; Normal reflexes
§4.71a Rating 10% * - 10% *
invalid font number 31502 *IAW VASRD §4.59, Painful Motion invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 The Board direct invalid font number 31502 ed invalid font number 31502 attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded invalid font number 31502 5099 invalid font number 31502 (left shoulder pain s/p repair of rotator cuff and repair) condition analogous to 5003 (degenerative arthritis) invalid font number 31502 , and rated at 10%. invalid font number 31502 The VA coded invalid font number 31502 as invalid font number 31502 5203 (s/p left rotator cuff tear with residuals) invalid font number 31502 and deferred the rating based on receipt and invalid font number 31502 review invalid font number 31502 of service records from the CI’s second period of service (2003-2004). The VARD invalid font number 31502 dated invalid font number 31502 20 September 2007 rated the left shoulder at 10% effective invalid font number 31502 on invalid font number 31502 14 invalid font number 31502   invalid font number 31502 August 2004 and coded as 5019 invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 b invalid font number 31502 ursitis invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 . The MEB and C&P exams both invalid font number 31502 documented pain invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 limited motion. No exam indicated limited ROM to a compensable level without application of §4.59 invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 p invalid font number 31502 ainful motion invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 . The Board considered the coding schema of 5201 invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 limitation of arm motion invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 and 5019 invalid font number 31502 ; invalid font number 31502 however invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 neither of these invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 rating invalid font number 31502 schemes invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 would result in a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the invalid font number 31502 left shoulder pain invalid font number 31502 condition invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP with a history of injury to T12 condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the left shoulder pain s/p repair of rotator cuff condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.







RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re - characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination .



The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130923 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150009921 (PD201301553)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01858

    Original file (PD-2013-01858.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The Informal PEBadjudicated “chronic back pain with T12 compression fracture without neurologic abnormality, combined thoracolumbar range-of- motion [ROM] of 225 degrees” and “chronic pain of left shoulder”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%, citing use of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy criteria for the left shoulder pain. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01693

    Original file (PD-2014-01693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20060316VA - (3 Mos. Chronic Upper Back Pain Condition . The CI was seen in pain managementprior to deploying for pain medications due to the chronic clavicle and shoulder pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00937

    Original file (PD 2013 00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Neck Pain Condition . The single voter for dissent did not elect to submit a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00067

    Original file (PD2012 00067.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The earliest documentation in the service treatment records (STR)of a left shoulder problem is a radiology report of the left shoulder dated 7 September 2007 that was normal; the X-ray had been requested for a history of severe pain in the left anterior shoulder after an apparent anterior subluxation on the previous day.Examination by physical therapy in October noted left shoulder abduction limited to 160 degrees and flexion limited to 170 degrees, both by pain. A week later, the CI had...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186

    Original file (PD 2013 01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00399

    Original file (PD2012 00399.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded cervical spine injury with compression fracture of C5 and left rib contusions, compression fracture T3/T4 & T10, retropatellar pain syndrome (RPPS), PTSD, right knee and idiopathic hypertension conditions, identified in the rating chart below. The VA ratings of the CI’s conditions were adjudicated by the VA rating decision (VARD) of 2005 which applied retroactive ratings IAW the VASRD effective prior to September 2003 and used the service treatment record (STR). At the VA...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01246

    Original file (PD2013 01246.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “right, dominant, shoulder pain… ,” “right hip pain,” and “bilateral heel pain and right ankle pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, 0% and 0% (respectively), citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Shoulder Pain…5099-500310%Right Shoulder Arthritis5010-520110%20091125Right Hip Pain…5099-50030%Right Hip Bursitis5024-525210%Bilateral Heel Pain and Right Ankle Pain…52840%Stress Fracture,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00130

    Original file (PD 2014 00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board agreed that the evidence in the record at both the MEB and C&P examinations supported the 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) for painful limited arm motion that did not meet the threshold compensable rating of 20% for “limited motion at shoulder level.” Board practice when rating ascode 5201 has considered 90 degrees of abduction or flexion “shoulder level.” There was no evidence in record of any other ratable impairment of the shoulder or incapacitating episodesallow for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00698

    Original file (PD2013 00698.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ; No muscle spasm invalid font number 31502 Also noted in evidence was a VA PT exam dated 13 months after separation that documented “Trunk ROM is limited 50% flexion, lateral flexion left and 25% rotation left. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD, scoliosis and strain condition as 5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine, rated at 20% based on a forward flexion of 40 degrees.The general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “With or without...