Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00507
Original file (PD-2014-00507.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2014-00507
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141203
SEPARATION DATE: 20061030


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a mobilized Reserve SGT/E5 (19D/Cavalry Scout) medically separated for a chronic low back condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3/H3 and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic low back pain (LBP) condition, characterized as “mechanical low back pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (bilateral knee pain and bilateral low-frequency hearing loss) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain,” as unfitting, rated at 10% with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining two conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The US Army Physical Disability Agency issued an administrative correction that did not change the disposition or rating. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “V.A. rated me 100% disabled + unemployable. Social Security found me disabled.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic low back condition is addressed below. Additionally, the bilateral knee pain and bilateral low-frequency hearing loss identified as not unfitting by the PEB, possibly contended by the CI, is also within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

PDA Admin Correction– Dated 20061010
 VA - (12 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5237 10% DDD, Lumbar Spine, w/ LOM 5299-5243 40% 20071029
Radiculopathy, LLE, Lumbar Disc Disease Associated w/ DDD, Lumbar Spine w/ LOM 8520 20% 20071029
Bilateral Knee Condition Not Unfitting Patellofemoral Syndrome, Right Knee 5299-5260 10% 20071009
Patellofemoral Syndrome, Right Knee 5299-5260 10% 20071009
Bilateral Low-Frequency Hearing Loss Not Unfitting Bilateral Hearing Loss 6100 *NSC
Other x 1 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 6
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 70%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80129 (most proximate to date of separation )
* Not Service Connected


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Low Back Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 15 August 2006 noted the CI had not passed the standard Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) since 2003 due to LBP. The CI reported a history of multiple minor traumas with subsequent back pain since 2001. An magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine in January 2006 reportedly revealed L5-S1 broad base disk bulge touching the anterior thecal sac and the left L5 nerve root with left neural foraminal narrowing at L5-S1 (MRI not among records). Additional findings were bilateral L5 spondylolysis with Grade I spondylolisthesis of L5 on S1. In February and March 2002, the CI did report numbness or tingling in the lower extremity without functional implication. There was no evidence of any incapacitating episodes related to his back and he was not considered a surgical candidate. Having failed conservative treatment he was placed on a permanent profile. There were only three treatment entries among the record in evidence; two recorded in 2002, and one in 2001. However, the NARSUM noted the CI had received treatment at the local VA (dates not recorded).

At the MEB NARSUM examination, the CI reported back and knee pain; intensity, duration, aggravating and alleviating factors were not recorded. However, his profile limited all physical activities except walking at own pace and distance. He was limited to ten pounds of lifting and 10 minutes of prolonged standing. Functional limitations recorded “no APFT” and the need for ambulatory assistance with cane or crutches. Physical examination recorded antalgic gait (he used a cane), and he was able to heel and toe walk with some difficulty. Examination of the spine demonstrated marked tenderness throughout, with range-of-motion (ROM) flexion to 20 degrees and extension to 5 degrees; measurements performed with goniometer. The physician noted the ROM was limited by pain. Waddell signs was positive, 5/5 (pain elicited on all maneuvers, and presence of overreaction to testing) and flip test (similar to straight leg test; test for sciatic nerve pain) was positive. The physician diagnosed mechanical LBP associated with degenerative disk disease (DDD), L5-S1 and spondylolysis and Grade I spondylolisthesis of L5 on S1. The evidence suggested the initial VA Compensation and Pension examination occurred 12 months after separation (exam not among records). The VARD indicated findings of that examination were consistent with the NARSUM. The lumbar ROM on flexion was 15 degrees with pain “at 0 and ending at 15;” and extension was “50” (likely 5) degrees with pain ending at 5 degrees.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition 10% code 5237 for painful motion (rated for tenderness). The PEB noted the CI had experienced multiple back traumas related to training then left active duty. When he mobilized in May 2005 he received a profile for continued back pain that had worsened over the years. The PEB opined the ROM flexion was limited by pain alone. However flexion was measure by goniometer at 20 degrees. The VA rated the condition of DDD at 40%, coded analogously 5299-5243 for flexion of 15 degrees. A 40% disability rating under the spine codes requires spasms producing abnormal gait, or abnormal curvature of the spine, or forward flexion not greater than 30 degrees. The Board reviewed the record in evidence and noted the absence of treatment entries with recorded ROM prior to the NARSUM. Both examinations reflected a 40% evaluation. The Board is required to evaluate ROM based on the VARSD’s directive. The VA rates limitation of motion due to pain at the point in which the examinee can no longer continue the motion. Board members acknowledged the back condition may have worsened secondary to other factors while the CI was not on active duty; however, he was allowed to return to active duty with a profile. All Board members agreed the 40% disability rating was supported. The Board also considered code 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome); however, this code did not support a higher rating since there was no evidence of incapacitating episodes of at least 6 weeks duration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 40%, coded 5237 for the low back pain condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the bilateral knee and hearing loss conditions were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The knee was not profiled or specifically implicated in the commander’s statement and was not judged to fail retention standards. Although the hearing loss condition was profiled, the condition was not implicated in the commander’s statement and was not judged to fail retention standards. All were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that the bilateral knee condition and the hearing loss condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the any of the contended conditions and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the mechanical LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 40%, coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the contended bilateral knee pain and hearing loss conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be re-characterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Mechanical Low Back Pain 5237 40%
COMBINED
 40%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140104, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record









XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150007090 (PD201400507)
1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 40% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 40% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.


3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00361

    Original file (PD2012-00361.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20091129 NAME: CASE NUMBER: PD1200361 BOARD DATE: 20121129 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty, SGT/E-5, 6467/Consolidated Automatic Support System (CASS) Technician (2yrs) – previously 3531/Motor Vehicle Operator (5yrs), medically separated for a low back condition. The contended conditions...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01509

    Original file (PD-2013-01509.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. A permanent L3 profile dated 4 April 2004 for right foot pain along with other conditions, had limitations of military functional activities and no physical fitness training or testing.At the VA C&P examination dated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00887

    Original file (PD 2012 00887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20060409 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic LBP 5299-5242 0% DDD Lumbosacral Spine 5243 40% 20070122 Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% S/P Arthroscopic Repair of Medial Meniscal Tear Right Knee w/ Traumatic DJD 5260-5010 10% 20070124 Left Knee Injury 5260 NSC* 20070122 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x 13 20070122 Combined: 0% Combined: 70% Derived from VA Rating Decision 20070308 (most proximate from the date of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00298

    Original file (PD2012-00298.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic low back pain with degenerative disc disease at L4-L5 and L5-S1 was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. The MEB physical exam documented the physical therapy ROM. Despite his best efforts, the CI was unable to perform the duties required of continued military service.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793

    Original file (PD2013 00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00949

    Original file (PD 2012 00949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200949 SEPARATION DATE: 20031003 BOARD DATE: 20130220 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (67R/Attack Helicopter Repairer), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) and chronic bilateral knee pain. Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain Condition: The CI had...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02542

    Original file (PD-2013-02542.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the knees separately at 5260, leg, limitation of flexion and assigned a disability rating of 10% for each knee. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00383

    Original file (PD2013 00383.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. The VA also applied an analogous code of 5010-5237, lumbosacral or cervical strain and rated it 10% based on...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01622

    Original file (PD2012 01622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back, neck and bilateral foot pain conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. In the matter of the bilateral foot pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01245

    Original file (PD-2012-01245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NARSUM documented a normal neurological examination and ROM. The conditions adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB and that were also contended by the CI are right foot pain secondary to pes planus, plantar fasciitis, and fractured 4th phalanx, right shoulder bursitis, bilateral knee osteoarthritis, and DDD of the cervical spine. An MRI of the left knee on 8 May 2006 (2 months prior to separation) was normal.