Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00471
Original file (PD-2014-00471.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2014-00471
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150616
SEPARATION DATE: 20070630


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-2 (Pharmacy Technician) medically separated for right knee pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “chondromalacia of the right knee” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (anxiety NOS) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated the right knee condition as “Fit for Duty.” The CI appealed to the Reconsideration PEB which adjudicated the “chronic right knee pain secondary to chondromalacia and repetitive strain injury, status post diagnostic arthroscopy, degenerative cartilage seen on MRI” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no further appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “My right knee was injured during AIT in 2005; surgery was performed in late 2006. To this date, I still have pain, swelling and decreased range of motion due to my service connected injury when the pain becomes unbearable, I go to a chiropractor; this becomes expensive.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :
Recon IPEB – Dated 20070522
 VA* - (~2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% Severe Chondromalacia of Patella, Right Knee 5260-5014 10% 20070508
Other x 1 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 1
RATING: 0%
 RATING: 10%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20070806 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Knee Condition. The CI first injured her right knee while running in August 2005. Recurring pain was evaluated with imaging studies, which showed degenerative changes (chondromalacia) of the undersurface of the patella (kneecap). On 3 November 2006 a right knee arthroscopy was performed. The majority of the patella was found to be affected by chondromalacia, which was treated with abrasion chondroplasty and microfracture techniques. Because the patella was noted to track laterally, a surgical release was performed to promote normal tracking. Post-operatively, knee pain was insufficiently relieved by conservative management.

The narrative summary on 20 March 2007 (3 months prior to separation) reported continuing knee pain and swelling exacerbated by prolonged walking, standing or driving. Examination of the right knee showed no swelling. Painful extension and tenderness were present, but there was no ligament instability. An examination by physical therapy on 28 March 2007 noted the anterior cruciate ligament to be intact. At an orthopedic follow-up evaluation on 29 March 2007, the CI continued to complain of constant right knee pain. Although the condition was noted to be improved since surgery, painful motion and knee tenderness were still present.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 2 months prior to separation, the CI reported constant anterior knee pain exacerbated by any pressure, climbing stairs or walking. Swelling and an occasional feeling of instability were also reported, but locking or use of assistive devices was denied. Examination showed a normal gait. There was no right knee swelling. All right knee ligaments were intact and a test for meniscal damage was negative.

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Right Knee ROM
 (Degrees)
MEB PT ~3 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~2 Mos. Pre-Sep
Flexion (140 Normal)
 136, 137, 139 130
Extension (0 Normal)
 0, 1, 1* 0
Comment
 +Painful motion +Tenderness, painful motion
§4.71a Rating
 10%** (PEB 0%) 10%** (VA 10%)
           *Hyperextension
          **Conceding VASRD § 4.40 (functional loss) or § 4.59 (painful motion)

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA chose different coding options for the condition, but this did not bear on rating. The PEB assigned a 0% rating under an analogous 5003 code (degenerative arthritis), while the VA rated at 10% using a combination 5260-5014 code (limitation of flexion; osteomalacia). Although there was no compensable limitation of motion, there was sufficient evidence of pain with use (§4.40, “functional loss”) and painful motion (§4.59) to justify a minimal compensable rating under §4.71a. The Board could find no support for rating higher than 10% under alternate knee codes. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right knee pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic right knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140106, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review







SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150015846 (PD201400471)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA




Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01299

    Original file (PD-2013-01299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain due to Chondromalacia5099-500320%Chondromalacia Patella L Knee526120%20050311Chondromalacia Patella, R Knee526120%20050311Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x020050314 Combined: 20%Combined: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050412 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00508

    Original file (PD-2014-00508.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Ultimately, the Board concluded that application of §4.40 or §4.59 was supported, and therefore separate 10% ratings for each knee were justified.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01337

    Original file (PD-2013-01337.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Hip and Bilateral Knee pain5099-50030%Residuals, Left Hip Stress Fracture5099-501010%20011212Right Knee Chondromalacia5099-501010%20011212Left Knee Chondromalacia5099-501010%20011212Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 2 RATING: 0%RATING: 30% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20020708(most proximate to date of separation(DOS)) Left Hip and Bilateral KneePain .This CI entered the Army in May 1999. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00367

    Original file (PD-2014-00367.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Knee Pain…5099-500310%Left Knee Chondromalacia Patella…5099-501410%20070808Chondromalacia Patella with Degenerative Changes, Right...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00550

    Original file (PD-2012-00550.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board acknowledges the left knee condition requested for consideration was silent in the PEB decision and not specified in the MEB. The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00222

    Original file (PD-2013-00222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : “I was put on NON deployment status and required to take physical therapy for my knees. Pre-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Chondromalacia Patella5299-500320%Right Knee Chondromalacia Patella5099-50190%20031021Left Knee Chondromalacia Patella5099-50190%20031021Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 1/NSC x 320031021 Combined: 20%Combined: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20031230 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). BOARD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02131

    Original file (PD-2014-02131.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain5099-50030%Incomplete Tear, Medial Ligament, Left Knee526010%20050901Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 11 RATING: 0%RATING: 40% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20051213(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). Left Knee Pain . An orthopedic evaluation 7 January 2005 noted left knee range-of-motion (ROM) of extension-flexion of 0-95 degrees (normal 0–140) with tenderness topalpation (TTP) over the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01678

    Original file (PD-2012-01678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The right knee condition, characterized as right knee chondromalacia patella, anterior knee pain syndrome, and nonunion of patellar fracture, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Right Knee ROM MEB – 4 mos. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic, Painful Right Knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02254

    Original file (PD-2014-02254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee Condition . However, although the CI reported that his knee frequently “gave out” at the C&P exam, there was no instability or laxity noted at the MEB or C&P exams and after separation rehab records...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02245

    Original file (PD 2014 02245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “left knee pain with chondromalacia patella” by the MEB, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Although the final PEB diagnosis was persistent knee pain “due to Patellofemoral Syndrome” and the MEB diagnosis was due to “chondromalacia patella,” the NARSUM diagnosis was due to “subluxation.” Radiographs indicated degenerative changes...