Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00287
Original file (PD-2014-00287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-00287
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS  BOARD DATE: 20150129
SEPARATION DATE: 20060731


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 (Rifleman) medically separated for a back condition. The condition did not improve adequately to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “displacement of lumbar intervertebral disc without myelopathy” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB found the “L4-L5 and L5-S1 central disk herniation” unfitting, and rated it 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI’s CONTENTION: The CI has made a lengthy contention which was reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Navy IPEB – dated 20060605
 VA – based on Service Treatment Record (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
L4-L5 and L5-S1 Central Disk Herniation 5237 10% Herniated Disc, L5-S1 With Left Lower Extremity Dysesthesias 5299-5243 10% STR
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 (Deferred) STR
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70108 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )




ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Pain (LBP). This CI has had a long history of LBP. In March 2005, he injured his back while doing leg presses. He was treated with medication and physical therapy. Magnetic resonance imaging showed L5-S1 left-sided paracentral disc herniation, without significant neural impingement. In January 2006, he was evaluated by neurosurgery and it was determined that he was not a surgical candidate. The examiner opined that surgery would destroy the integrity of the disc and recommended conservative treatment measures. However, in spite of treatment, the CI’s back pain persisted and an MEB was initiated. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) was dated 16 May 2006. At that exam, the CI reported that he was unable to run, squat, bend, lift, or stand for lengthy periods. He also reported numbness and tingling in the left lower extremity, all the way down to the foot. He denied any weakness. Physical examination (PE) of the back revealed some tenderness to palpation, and slightly decreased range-of-motion (ROM). He could side bend 15 degrees to either side, and forward flex to approximately the level of the kneecap. There was no pain with extension. Neurological exam of the lower extremities was nonfocal. Gait was described as “unsteady.”

Eleven days later, on 27 May 2006, the CI had a PE that was recorded on DD Form 2808. That PE was cursory, and poorly documented. On ROM testing, forward flexion was 20 degrees, extension 5 degrees, and side bending 30 degrees. As noted above, the PEB found him unfit, and he was medically separated from service on 31 July 2006. On 10 June 2010, 4 years later, he had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam. At that exam, posture and gait were normal. PE of the back revealed a positive straight leg raise (slightly limited). Neurological exam was normal. The diagnosis of the back condition was: Lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus. Thoracolumbar ROM was measured, and is summarized below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~2 mos . Pre-Sep
(200605 27 )
 VA C&P ~47 mos . Post-Sep
(20100610)
Flexion (90 Normal) 20 30
Combined (240) (n/a) 165
Comment Poorly documented exam Too long after DOS
invalid font number 31502                                        invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502
The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Board determined that the June 2010 C&P exam was too long after the DOS, and therefore had diminished probative value. The 27 May 2006 exam recorded on DD Form 2808 was not a thorough PE, and was poorly documented. The Board members agreed that the PE with greatest probative value was performed on 16 May 2006, and was recorded in the NARSUM. At that exam, the CI’s gait was “unsteady” and lumbar ROM was “slightly decreased.” With forward flexion, he could flex his lumbar spine to approximately the level of his kneecap. The Board surmised this to mean that his fingertips touched the kneecap. Based on this data, the Board determined that, at DOS, it was more likely than not that thoracolumbar forward flexion was greater than 30 degrees, but not greater than 60 degrees. IAW VASRD §4.71a, a disability rating of 20% is warranted for thoracolumbar forward flexion greater than 30 degrees, but not greater than 60 degrees. The Board also considered the matter of peripheral neuropathy. After reviewing all the information in the record, there was insufficient evidence of a clinically significant neuropathy that interfered with performance of military duties. The CI had neurological symptoms. However, there was no performance-based evidence that the neurological condition impacted his military duties. Therefore, the Board concluded that there was no unfitting radiculopathy present at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the unfitting back condition, characterized as “L4-L5 and L5-S1 central disc herniations.”

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5237, IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
L4-L5 and L5-S1 central disc herniations 5237 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140105, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
         DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
        
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
 (b) PDBR ltr dtd 26 May 15 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (c) PDBR ltr dtd 7 May 15 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (d) PDBR ltr dtd 7 May 15 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (d).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Entitlement to disability severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.

b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Entitlement to disability severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.

c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 40 percent disability rating effective date of discharge.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions, including the recoupment of disability severance pay, if warranted, and notification to the subject members once those actions are completed.



                           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Assistant General Counsel
                 (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02651

    Original file (PD-2013-02651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic thoracolumbar back pain due to scoliosis” as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00452

    Original file (PD-2014-00452.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of my medical records will show this. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01421

    Original file (PD-2013-01421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01973

    Original file (PD-2013-01973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After aggressive physical therapy, LIMDU statusand three spinal [steroid] injections the CI did had mild symptoms improvement but continued to experience intermittent back pain and had persisted abnormal foot sensation throughout the balance of his career.Surgical intervention was not recommended and there were no reports of incapacitation.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 8 April 2005 (5 months prior to separation),the examiner noted tenderness and spasm of the left lower back and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

    Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01774

    Original file (PD-2013-01774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)*ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, without Neurological Abnormality5299-523710%Diffuse Lumbar Spondylosis5003-524210%20050104Left L5-S1 Radiculopathy 8599-852010%20050104Other x 0Other x 3 Rating: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050323 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Low Back Pain (LBP) . A 10% rating is also warranted when combined thoracolumbar ROM is greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02308

    Original file (PD-2013-02308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He rated his pain at 4/10. Deluca criteria§4.71a Rating10%* (PEB 10%)10% (VA 10%) invalid font number 31502 *IAW VASRD §4.59, Painful motion invalid font number 31502 The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic LBP secondary to L5-S1 HNP without neurologic deficit condition 5243 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) and rated at 10%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01647

    Original file (PD2012 01647.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20030917VA (# Mo. The PEB used these rules to rate the chronic LBP condition, coded 5295 lumbosacral strain, and initially rated at 10% (with characteristic pain on motion). The Board notes that although they did not change the VASRD code, verbiage contained on the FPEB’s findings and recommendations document suggeststhe FPEB may have utilized VASRD code 5293, intervertebral disc syndrome (also in effect at the time of separation) to arrive at...