Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02149
Original file (PD-2013-02149.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-02149
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army          BOARD DATE: 20150715
SEPARATION DATE: 20051214


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-6 (Avionic Systems Repairer) medically separated for a low back condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine…” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP)…” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI contends that his rating should be higher as reflected in his VA rating. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20050826
 VA* - (~1 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain… 5299-5237 10% Degenerative Joint Disease, Lumbar Spine 5242 10% 20051207
Sciatica, Left Lower Extremity 8620 NSC
Sciatica, Right Lower Extremity 8620 NSC
Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 11
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50701 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) ) .



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Lumbar Spine. The service treatment record revealed that the CI initially developed non-traumatic low back pain (LBP) in early 2003 and had intermittent exacerbations of similar pain and occasional radicular symptoms throughout his military career. Radiographic evaluation noted lower lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) assessed as “minimal.” His mainstay of treatment remained physical therapy (PT), medications, restrictions, and spinal manipulation. Despite such therapy, his back symptoms remained. He was permanently profiled in May 2005 and was referred to a MEB. At the time of the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), 2 June 2005; 6 months prior to separation, the CI’s primary complaint was chronic LBP with frequent exacerbations and rare symptoms in his legs. His physical examination (PE) revealed tenderness about the lumbar spine as well as decreased thoracolumbar range of motion (ROM). His neurologic examination was normal. There was no comment in regards to painful motion. His diagnosis was listed as “DDD of the lumbar spine with chronic pain with occasional disabling exacerbations usually non-radicular.”

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed on 7 December 2005, a week prior to separation, provided a chronology of the CI’s back condition noting no additional physical complaints. The PE revealed lumbar spasm and minimally decreased ROM. His gait was normal. The examiner’s overall assessment included the following comment:

“At this point in time, {the CI} has a minimal amount of physical impairment, but apparently it was much worse when {the CI} was required to do the activities of a soldier.”

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 6 Mo. Pre-Sep
(200 50626 )
VA C&P ~ 1 week P re -Sep
(200 51207 )
Flexion (90 Normal) 6 0 90
Extension (30) 2 5 15
R Lat Flexion (30) 2 0 20
L Lat Flexion (30) 2 5 20
R Rotation (30) 50 30
L Rotation (30) 45 30
Combined (240) 225 205
Comment tenderness (+) spasm ; (+) normal gait
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10%

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Although the PEB and VA titled the unfitting back condition slightly differently, they both utilized similar primary codes of 5237 (lumbosacral strain) and 5242 (degenerative arthritis) respectively; with the PEB citing pain exacerbations with duty performance failures and the VA as limited ROM. Board members first agreed that the VA examination denoted exclusive probative value in this case due to it being accomplished one week from the date of service separation. The presence of lumbar spasm, not resulting in an abnormal gait as well as the combined thoracolumbar ROM clearly supported the VASRD 10% impairment level. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board agreed that a disability rating of 10% for the chronic LBP condition was appropriately recommended in this case.

The Board additionally considered if the occasional symptomatic lower extremity radiculopathy symptoms warranted additional Service disability rating; but, members agreed that the requisite link of the neuropathy symptoms with functional impairment was not in evidence in this case. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The Board concluded therefore that any radiculopathy type symptom or condition could not be recommended for an additional disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the low back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131023, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record









XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150015860 (PD201302149)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA



                 


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01342

    Original file (PD-2012-01342.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lower extremity sensation, strength and reflexes were normal.According to subsequent VA C&P examinations, the CI underwent back surgery in July 2004 without improvement in his back pain. Except for the VA C&P examination 2 months after separation, examinations in the months during 2003 prior to separation documented back flexion that exceeded 30 degrees and ranged from 45 degrees to “full”ROM and therefore did not support a rating higher than the 20% adjudicated by the PEB or the VA. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

    Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02692

    Original file (PD-2014-02692.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Therefore, based on a thorough review of the evidence in the treatment record, the Board determined that, at the time of separation, a 20% disability rating was appropriate for the CI’s chronic back condition. BOARD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02203

    Original file (PD-2013-02203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lumbar Spine Condition . The examiner noted that three repetitions did not further reduce the lumbar ROM.Radiographs of the lumbar spine showed the transitional vertebra with normal spine alignment and normal S1 joints.At the VA C&P peripheral nerves examination on 25 April 2009 the CI reported back pain that radiated down both legs, at times to the heels. The VA rated the lumbar spine DDD at 20%, coded 5242 and denied service-connection for radiculopathy.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01058

    Original file (PD2012-01058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, this Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation based on the VASRD standards in effect at that time. An outpatient examination on 21 November 2001 (7 months prior to separation) documented a negative straight leg raise (SLR) test and normal muscle strength, sensation and DTRs. At a later C&P exam on 23 June 2003 (a year after separation), the CI reported constant low back dull, aching pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01730

    Original file (PD-2013-01730.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA rated the service connected chronic back condition as degenerative arthritis of the spine (5242-5003) at 10% citing painful motion.Although the PEB and VA used different codes, both codes are rated under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine, based on limitation of thoracolumbar ROM. In the matter of the chronic back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a.There were no other conditions...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02326

    Original file (PD-2014-02326.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Formal MEB PT goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) testing of the thoracolumbar spine was performed on 15 December 2006 (approximately 5 months prior to separation) and documented forward flexion of 20 degrees (normal 90) and combined ROM of 120 degrees (normal 240). The PEB disability description indicated the rating was based on tenderness and ROM limited by pain, but did not specify ROM values or detail which ROM exam was used for rating. Additionally, the CI had continuing and recurring...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01014

    Original file (PD 2012 01014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the low back condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). CI CONTENTION: “I have to take medication for my back to relieve the pain. Post-Sep (20030724) Flexion (90 Normal) 75 80 Extension (30) 15 10 R Lat Flex (30) 25 30 L Lat Flex (30) 20 30 R Rotation (30) 25 - L Rotation (30) 25 - Comment Tender to pressure; without palpable spasm; no visible deformity Pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00708

    Original file (PD2012-00708.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB rated the condition 10% based on pain on forward motion under the 5295 code for lumbosacral strain. The VA reported 90 degrees of lumbar forward flexion and ROMs were consistent with near-normal ROMs from the AMA guidelines in effect at the time, and the Board adjudged these as slight limitation (IAW 5292, Spine, limitation of lumbar motion). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00761

    Original file (PD-2012-00761.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200761 SEPARATION DATE: 20020116 BOARD DATE: 20121218 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard Soldier, SGT/E‐5 (45E, assigned to a Hull Systems Mechanic slot, 63E), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) accompanied by neck pain with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at...