Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01931
Original file (PD-2013-01931.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE : PD -20 13 - 0 1931
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 201 4 0716
Separation Date: 20050509


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSgt/E-5 (2S071/Supply Management Craftsman) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Air Force Specialty (AFS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a temporary L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The LBP, left leg pain and piriformis conditions were characterized as “not meeting retention standards” and forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were identified by the MEB. The informal PEB adjudicated “low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10% with cited application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were not noted on the PEB document, and are presumed to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : The CI elaborated no specific contention in her application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic LBP condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20050323
 VA - (4 Mos. Post-Separation
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic LBP 5237 10% Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Syndrome 5243 10% 20050926
Radiculopathy, Left Lower Extremity 8520 10% 20050926
Radiculopathy, Right Lower Extremity 8520 10% 20050926
No Other MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x1 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20051216 (most prox imate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Chronic Lower Back Pain Condition : The CI in jured her back after she tripped over a trailer hitch and f ell backwards on 16 October 1997 . T horacic and lumbar spine X -ray s were both normal. The CI was referred to Physical Therapy (PT) for left hip and LBP. A b one scan was also normal. A repeat lumbar spine X -ray done for reported pain radiating into the ankles bilaterally showed findings that were suggestive of congenital spinal canal stenosis. A lumbosacral spine MRI was normal. The CI had an electromyelogram (EMG) and a nerve conduction study (NCS) done on 30 April 2003 which w ere normal. The CI was given an initial epidural steroid injection in April 2003. The o rthopedist noted that the CI had LBP as well as bilateral buttocks and hip pain. The physical exam fin din gs were tenderness over the sacroiliac joints bilaterally and tenderness throughout the lumbar spine and some midline tenderness to palpation . There were no focal, motor or sensory deficits. The CI was evaluated by pain management and given a second epidural steroid injection. She was seen in follow-up by orthopedics and reported that she had some short term pain relief, however the symptoms had returned. The CI was given a third epidural steroid injection on 3 October 2003. She was thoroughly evaluated by n eurosurgery for complaints of constant sharp back pain 10 out of 10 and constant sharp pain that radiated down her hips and down her legs with numbness and tingling in her left leg. The three epidural steroid injections did not pr ovide long- term pain relief. T he physical exam findings were patchy areas of diminished sensation in the right lower extremity, normal reflexes, normal muscle tone, negative straight leg raises and no palpable tenderness over the lumbar facets . H owever , there was left hip pain with flexion/abduction and no pain radiation into the groin. The examiner recommended a myelogram with flexion/extension views of the lumbar spine which demonstrated mild disc space narrowing at L4-5 with a mild right sided disc bulge. The CI was given a temporary L4 Profile with additional specific restrictions. The commander’s statement documented that her medical condition did not affect her work performance as she con tinued to work full shifts with out hesitation. The commander further stated that the CI was highly motivated to overcome her condition and he highly recommended her ret ention in the USAF with cross- training into another career field. The MEB s’ narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 4 months prior to separation documented that the CI had chronic LBP, left leg pain and p iriformis syndrome without long- term relief despite undergoing multiple treatment modalities. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam , approximately 5 months after separation , documented that the CI had daily pain across the back that radiated into the hips and buttocks down to the posterior thighs and knees. She required the pain medication T ramadol 4 times a day and was unable to sit or drive for more than 30 minutes or to walk more than a half mile. She had flares once or twice monthly with no additional activity restrictions. The physical exam findings are noted in the chart below.

There were two range-of- motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) NARSUM ~ 4 Mo. Pre-Sep PT ROMS 3 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 4. 5 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) - 35 90
Combined (240) - 100 240
Comment Pos. painful motion; Normal gait; No tenderness to palpation; Normal strength , reflexes &b sensation ; Neg. straight leg raise Pos. painful motion Pos. painful motion; Normal gait; No tenderness or spasm; Neg. straight leg raise; Normal strength; No Deluca criteria
§4.71a Rating - 2 0% 10%
invalid font number 31502
The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the c hronic LBP condition as 5237 , l umbosacral or cervical strain , and rated at 10%. The VA coded the lumbar intervertebral disc syndrome (also claimed as chronic LBP , herniated disc, and disc bulge) condition as 5243 , intervertebral disc syndrome , and rated at 10%. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine con siders the CI’s pain symptoms “w ith or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The PT ROM values obtained 3 months prior to separation are consistent with a 20% rating while the C&P exam performed over 4 months after separation are consistent with a 10% rating. The remainder of the evidence present for review does not support one rating over the other and there is no evidence to account for the discrepancy. As both exams were equally detailed, the Board adjudged the pre-separation evidence to be the most probative for its rating recommendation. The CI had no periods of incapacitation and was able to adequately perform her military duties within the scope of her profile. Board precedent is that a functional impairment tied to fitness is required to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating at separation. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The sensory component in this case has no functional implications , there was no motor impairment , and her EMG /N C S tests were negative. Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the LBP condition.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5327 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic L ow B ack P ain 5237 2 0%
COMBINED 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 131023 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record









                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01931.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Accordingly, the Board recommended modification of your assigned disability rating without re-characterization of your separation with severance pay.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed.

                                                               Sincerely,







                                                              
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachments:
1. Directive
2. Record of Proceedings

cc:
SAF/MRBR

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01739

    Original file (PD-2013-01739.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the CI’s history of significant back pain with muscle spasm and radiation of pain with mild weakness and decreased sensation of the right lower leg. However, notes in the STRs proximate to separation indicated daily use of a muscle relaxant medication and later evidence in record suggests episodes of muscle spasm continued, consistent with the lumbar spine abnormalities noted on MRI.Board members consensus was that the totality of evidence in record supports the 20%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00814

    Original file (PD 2014 00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Anterior Lumbar Fusion524120%Low Back Strain with Sciatica5243-523720%20100128Left Leg Numbness Associated with Low Back Strain with Sciatica852010%20100128L5-S1 Herniated DiskCategory IISee Above20100128MicrodiskectomyCategory IISee Above20100128Other x1 (Not in Scope)Other x520100111 Combined: 20%Combined: 70%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100420 (most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020

    Original file (PD-2012-01020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01154

    Original file (PD-2014-01154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Examination noted normal lumbar spine ROM with pain and normal bilateral hip ROM.An orthopedic evaluation on 27 March 2009, 5 months prior to separation, noted a 16-month history of pelvic pain following pregnancy. At...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02299

    Original file (PD-2013-02299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Neck Pain…524310%Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Spine5299-524210%20060731Chronic Low Back Pain…524310%Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spine524210%20060731Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 7 RATING: 20%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070215(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). At pain management visit dated 10 May 2004 the CI reported increased neck and right upper back pain with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01082

    Original file (PD 2012 01082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, based on severity at the time of separation. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5243, IAW VASRD §4.71a that was in effect at the time of separation. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793

    Original file (PD2013 00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00463

    Original file (PD 2014 00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition was not considered by the PEB. The pain was rated at 9 out of 10. The MEB NARSUM examiner documented chronic left knee pain that was medically managed.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00808

    Original file (PD2012 00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic back pain and chronic neck pain as medically unacceptablefor Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication IAW AR 40-501.The PEB adjudicated the “chronic pain, neck and LBP, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated together as 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the “unbundled” chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees it was not separately unfitting and that it cannot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

    Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...