Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01853
Original file (PD-2013-01853.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX           CASE: PD-2013-01853
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY           BOARD DATE: 20141017
SEPARATION DATE: 20050305


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-3 (31B/Military Police), medically separated for a chronic right hip condition. Her condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB characterized her condition as “chronic iliopsoas tendinitis” as medically unacceptable. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the right hip condition as “chronic right hip iliopsoas and snapping hip syndrome,” as unfitting and rated it at 0%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “submitted 3 separate claims; 2 rated 0%, hip fracture (flexor tendon shredded) rated 10% continually seeking treatment for disability. ..what has hindered me in not only my professional life but also personal life. Still have daily challenges with pain and adaptation. As well as, can not perform certain tasks. This can effect my ability to work on my feet, exercise and enjoying other things in life.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right hip condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the Board’s defined DoDI 6040.44 purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20050120
 VA
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Iliopsoas Tendinitis and Snapping Hip Syndrome 5024 0% Chronic Iliopsoas Tendinitis, Right 5316 30%* Not Available
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 5 Not Available
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 81121 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] available ).
* Original C&P and VARD are not available. First VARD available dated 20081121 reflect a decrease in rating from 30% to 10%.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: In accordance with DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation.

Chronic Right Iliopsoas Tendinitis Condition. Review of the service treatment records revealed that the CI first noted the gradual onset of a painful, popping, right hip in the autumn of 2003, also associated with symptoms of shinsplints starting in September 2003 and a “borderline stress fracture” of the right tibia. Examination early in the course of this condition noted (1) pain with running, sit-ups and flutter kicks, (2) an “antalgic gait” and pain with range-of-motion (ROM) of the hip, (3) X-ray report noting “normal right hip,” and (4) bone scan revealing no hip or pelvic fracture. Physical therapy noted a diagnosis of right hip tendinitis with “developing right tibial stress fracture.” X-rays of the pelvis and right leg, 13 months prior to separation were read as normal and further imaging of the hip ruled out the presence of a surgically correctable injury. Without improvement from physical therapy, the CI was referred to orthopedics, which documented right hip pain, especially at the extremes of ROM, with tenderness to palpation of the iliopsoas muscle, non-tender trochanter and bursa, with full ROM of the hip, a negative FABER test (stands for Flexion, ABduction, and External Rotation; is performed to evaluate pathology of the hip joint or the sacroiliac joint) and a diagnosis of “iliopsoas tendinitis.” The CI was issued a permanent (L3) profile, 7 months prior to separation, prohibited running, marching, squatting and jumping, limited prolonged standing, exercise and recommended for a MEB. The commander’s memorandum to the PEB listed her limitations and noted that her “physical impairments prevent her from fulfilling the requirements” of her MOS. At the MEB exam, the CI reported right hip pain, with inability to stand or squat, with limited ability to move her hip. Pain was “controlled” by rest and medication. The MEB physical exam noted a normal lower extremity examination, with mild to moderate, symptomatic pes planus (flat feet).

The narrative summary (NARSUM), 5 months prior to separation, noted right hip pain, slight and frequent, worse with a positive FABER test (pain with flexion, abduction and external rotation), with pain when approaching the limits of ROM in all planes. There was pain with (1) flexion beyond 90 degrees, (2) extension past -5 degrees, (3) external rotation past 20 degrees and (4) nonspecific pain with internal rotation. Active ROM was not documented, but the passive flexion was documented at 130 degrees and passive extension at -10 degrees. Strength, sensation and reflexes were normal. The NARSUM recommended that the diagnosis of chronic iliopsoas tendinitis was medically unacceptable. The MEB, 3 months prior to separation, also recommended that the condition was medically unacceptable. The Informal PEB, 2 months prior to separation, found the condition unfitting. The only VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination presented as evidence for this Board to review, dated over 3 years after separation, documented right hip pain, and noted an “examination of the hips within normal limits” with normal ROM, without fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance or coordination and without ROM loss upon repetitive motion.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded this condition under VARD code 5024 (tenosynovitis), rated at 0%, noting pain was mild, and with ROM “essentially full except as prohibited by pain.” The VARD, dated 3 years after separation, and based upon a VA C&P examination of limited probative value due to the length of time since separation, lowered to 10%, under code 5316, a previous VA rating of 30%, the evidence for which was not presented to this Board for review. This condition did not meet the criteria for rating under VASRD codes 5251 or 5252 for limited hip ROM. VASRD code 5003 instructs that limitation of motion should be rated under the appropriate diagnostic codes for the specific joints involved, unless the limitation of motion of the specific joint involved is noncompensable under those codes, in which case a rating of 10% is applied to a joint affected by limitation of motion, provided the limitation of motion is objectively confirmed by satisfactory evidence of painful motion. The painful motion in this case was well documented in the NARSUM and was specifically included in the Informal PEB findings. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (Higher of two evaluations), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic right iliopsoas tendinitis condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic right iliopsoas tendinitis condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5003-5024 IAW VASRD §4.71a and §4.59a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Right Iliopsoas Tendinitis Condition 5003-5024 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131022, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record









                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150006293 (PD201301853)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00877

    Original file (PD2012-00877.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic left hip condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The CI did have pain with motion of the left hip.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00088

    Original file (PD2012-00088.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSGT/E-6 (98C30/Research, Development, Test and Evaluation NCO), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) and right hip pain. The orthopedic examination performed on 14 February 2006, ROM was consistent with the MEB NARSUM examination and also indicated absence of tenderness or muscle spasm that would support a 10% rating using the general rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02404

    Original file (PD-2013-02404.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although she was able to perform an alternate physical fitness test, she could not meet the requirements of her MOS.The VA C&P examination (8 plus months prior to separation) referenced a 2005 knee injury not evidenced in the STR; and,documented daily pain rated 7/10 exacerbated by “exercise, prolonged standing, [and] bending.” The VA physical exam noted a normal gait, no tenderness, no instability or signs of cartilage impingement, and recorded ROM measurements of 140 degrees flexion and 0...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02501

    Original file (PD-2014-02501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Examination of the back was reported as normal and the examiner stated he could not ascribe any physical diagnosis or attribute any physical impairment to the LBP complaint.The Board first considered whether the back pain condition was unfitting when considered separately from the hip pain condition.Although the back and hip pain were somewhat intermingled in treatment records, orthopedic examiners described back pain separately from hip pain and indicated some impairment due to back pain. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00831

    Original file (PD2011-00831.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral hip condition as unfitting, rated 10% with specified application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The first VA hip exam was dated 20110817. Chronic Bilateral Hip Pain Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01031

    Original file (PD2012 01031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated “Chronic pain, due to snapping hip syndrome” as unfitting, rated 10% andcitedapplication of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board’s role is therefore confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation. At the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01221

    Original file (PD-2012-01221.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post‐Sep (20030107) Full Full Normal gait, silent to painful motion 0% §4.71a Rating 0% At the MEB exam, the CI reported pain in her left shoulder and left hip that prevented her from performing her duties. The VA assigned the left hip a 10% rating for pain to palpation which is inconsistent with the VASRD §4.59 which is for painful motion. In the matter of the left shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5304‐5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00870

    Original file (PD2012-00870.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After completing physical therapy, he was able to attend AIT physical training for the next 5 months, until he injured his hand at which time he was referred to the MEB. after sep §4.71a Rating *Initially rated 0%; administrative correction to 10% application Army USAPDA At time of MEB the occupational therapist opined “pain limits range of motion,” with documented normal extension with a decrease in flexion 160 degrees (normal 180 degrees) and decreased internal and external rotations. In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01231

    Original file (PD-2012-01231.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Achilles Tendinitis50240%Achilles Tendinitis, Right Chronic5024-507120%20021210Hearing Loss Right EarNot UnfittingProfound Sensori-neural Hearing Loss, Right Ear6100NSC20021210No Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x 620021210 Combined: 0%Combined: 30% * Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20030128 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests another...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01998

    Original file (PD-2013-01998.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pain medication required.” *VARD dated 25 July 2008 rated Posterior Tibial Tendonitis, right ankle 10% using code 5271 effective 24 March 2008 and Posterior Tibial Tendonitis, left ankle 10% using code 5271 effective 24 March 2008 and retained a 30% rating using code 5299-5276 for bilateral pes planus and plantar fasciitis (previously evaluated as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction bilaterally, plantar fasciitis bilaterally) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the CI’s information...