Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01811
Original file (PD-2013-01811.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2013-01811
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140423
SEPARATION DATE: 20041216


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (92R2O/Parachute Rigger) medically separated for a left femur condition. The left femur pain could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P2/L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Chronic pain in the left femur and diabetes were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as not meeting medical standards. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic pain in the left femur as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting. The US Army Physical Disability Agency performed an Administrative Correction, only correcting the disability description. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left femur condition is addressed below. The not unfitting diabetes condition was not contended and, thus is not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

PDA Admin Correction – Dated 20041007
 VA* - (5 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Pain in the Left Femur 5099-5003 10% S/P Open Reduction Internal Fixation, Femur Fracture Left 5255 10% 20050513
Diabetes Not Unfitting Diabetes Mellitus, Type II 7913 20% 20050513
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 2 20050513
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50912 (most proxima te to date of separation (DOS))


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

Chronic Pain in Left Femur. After undergoing surgery for the isolated proximal left femur fracture in April 2002, the CI experienced an uncomplicated course. Five months post-operatively, he was walking long distances without a cane and complaining of no pain. However, by 10 months after surgery he was experiencing persistent thigh pain.

On 19 May 2004 (7 months prior to separation), the orthopedic MEB addendum examiner noted that the CI did not need narcotic medication for pain. He complained of constant pain in the left thigh and buttock that could awaken him from sleep. Pain was worse with walking; he could not run or jump. Physical exam noted a normal gait and difficulty rising from a squat. Tenderness of the left buttock, but not the thigh, was present. Moderate left thigh (quadriceps muscle) atrophy was noted. There was no visible leg length discrepancy. There was no change in range-of-motion (ROM) measurements after three repetitions. X-rays showed one centimeter of femur shortening, a well-healed proximal femur fracture and properly positioned surgical hardware.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam on 13 May 2005 (5 months after separation), the CI reported constant pain and catching in the hip. He complained of difficulty running and squatting. Examination showed equal leg lengths. He required no assistive devices, but gait was “abnormal” due to limitation of left hip motion. After repetitive use, fatigue and weakness were reported to additionally limit joint function. Repetitive motion measurements were not provided. Muscle strength was normal. Painful motion was specified for internal rotation only.

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Left Hip (Thigh) ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB Ortho
7 Mo s . Pre-Sep
 VA C&P 5 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (125 Normal) 105 125
Extension (20) 0 30
External Rotation (45) 40 60
Abduction (0-45) -- 45
Adduction (45) -- 25
Comment +tenderness +painful motion
§4.71a Rating PEB 10% VA 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 10% rating under an analogous 5003 code (degenerative arthritis). The VA likewise rated the condition at 10%, but under the 5255 code (impairment of femur). The Board agreed that a 10% rating was justified under 5251 (compensable limitation of extension at time of MEB exam), or for functional loss (§4.40) or painful motion (§4.59). The Board considered a route to a higher rating under the 5255 code. “Slight” hip disability justifies a 10% rating, while “moderate” disability warrants a 20% rating. Board members considered an abnormal gait which was attributed to limitation of hip motion by the VA examiner, yet the exam documented normal hip flexion and extension. The exam noted a normal gait, but difficulty arising from a squatting position was present. It was agreed that “slight” disability best describes the evidence at hand and therefore a 10% rating is recommended. Board members finally debated the application of VASRD §4.45 in this case, which allows for the next higher rating if evidence of additional functional loss after repetitive motion is evident, but agreed that available evidence did not support that approach. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic pain of the left femur.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic pain in the left femur and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131024, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150001001 (PD201301811)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02473

    Original file (PD-2014-02473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left hip. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Hip Pain5299-525510%Residuals, Left Femoral Neck Fracture525520%20090504Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 8 RATING 10%RATING: 30% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20090731(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). Left Hip Pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00139

    Original file (PD2012-00139.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the DES considers all of the service member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a service member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. An MEB endocrinology examiner, 3 months prior to separation, noted a normal gait and no back tenderness. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00842

    Original file (PD2011-00842.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the right hip heterotopic ossification and left wrist scaphoid avascular necrosis conditions as unfitting, rated 10% respectively, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Left Wrist Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION Right Hip Heterotopic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00950

    Original file (PD2012 00950.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The hip condition, characterized as right inferior pubic ramus stress fracture,was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated chronic right groin and hip pain secondary to stress fracture of the inferior pubic ramus as unfitting, rated 0%with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01107

    Original file (PD2012 01107.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “left distal femoral stress fracture” and “stress fracture right talus” as unfitting, each rated 0%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). If he is on steep ground, the ankle will roll.” The VA physical exam (normal gait as above) recorded, “the right ankle is tender anteriorly to palpation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00751

    Original file (PD2012-00751.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the left hip condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Left Hip Condition. The Board acknowledges the X-ray evidence revealed a healed stress fracture therefore the VA could not consider coding with the 5255 code and further notes the VA ratable data allows the minimum compensable 10% rating for painful motion.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01123

    Original file (PD2010-01123.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Other Conditions. The Board therefore has no basis for recommending the PTSD condition as an additional unfitting condition for separation rating. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review xxxxxx records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00450

    Original file (PD 2014 00450.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The condition, characterized as “chronic left hip pain, status post percutaneous pinning of a left femoral neck stress fracture” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated his condition as unfitting, rated at 10%,citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Hip Pain…5099-500310%Status...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01486

    Original file (PD-2013-01486.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20040630 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At the VA C&P examination approximately 17 months after separation, the CI reported severe right hip and thigh pain with decreased sensation over the right thigh.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02079

    Original file (PD-2014-02079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner noted X-rays of both hips performed on 12 August 2009 were normal.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 29 October 2009, 9 months after separation, there was full ROM of both hips with...