Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01790
Original file (PD-2013-01790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01790
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140717
SEPARATION DATE: 20040806


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty 1stLt/O-2 (11A2K/Pilot) medically separated for bilateral wrist pain. The wrist condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a temporary U4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The wrist condition, characterized as “bilateral chronic hand pain,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral chronic wrist pain” as unfitting, rating the left and right wrist at 10% each with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI writes: “In 2012XXX from the Pain Clinic at the VA Hospital in Little Rock. AR diagnosed the likely etiology of my chronic bilateral hand pain to be radiculopathy from disk protrusion at C4-5 and right central disk protrusion at C5-6. Dr. A---, as well as Dr. K-- in Physical Rehabilitation, have also theorized that osteoarthritis may also be a part of the etiology of my hand pain. Dr. A-- performed two procedures in 2012 which helped alleviate the pain in my hands, albeit temporarily. Dr. K-- advised me that osteoarthritis is identified with a clinical diagnosis. She stated there was possibility osteoarthritis began with the pain in my hands. She referenced pain I have had in my knees, left elbow and lower back as contributing to her theory. Dr. K-- stated the procedures performed by Dr. A-- may have alleviated pain from osteoarthritis, just the same as it could have alleviated pain from disc protrusion. I believe that had I been given an MRI on my neck while still active duty the protruding discs would have been found, which would have led to a different outcome. In addition, I tried to return to active duty and was told that any issue with the spine is completely disqualifying. Therefore, I feel my medical discharge should be changed to a medical retirement since what made me unfit for duty is keeping me from returning to duty.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting bilateral wrist condition is addressed below. The cervical spine and osteoarthritis conditions as contended by the CI, were not considered by the MEB or PEB and are therefore not within the purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which her service-connected condition continues to burden her; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040602
 VA - (Same month as Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Chronic Wrist Pain—L Wrist 8715 10% Cubital Tunnel/Over-Use Syndrome, L Wrist 8599-8515 10% 20040805
Bilateral Chronic Wrist Pain-R Wrist 8715 10% Cubital Tunnel/Over-Use Syndrome, R Wrist 8599-8515 10% 20040805
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 4 20040805
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40915 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board will discuss the right and left hand conditions together as most clinical evaluations addressed both en gros but then separate them for rating consideration.

Bilateral Wrist Pain. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes this right-hand dominant CI developed pain, tingling and weakness in both hands during pilot training. These symptoms occurred predominately when flying with the left worse when flying in the pilot’s seat and the right worse when in the co-pilot’s seat. An extensive medical evaluation to include evaluations by multiple rheumatologists, cardiologists, neurologists, ophthalmologists, physical and occupational therapists and extensive laboratory testing revealed no detectable organic etiology for these symptoms. X-rays of the hands and cervical spine, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, nerve conduction studies and clinical evaluations for carpel and cubital tunnel syndromes revealed no etiology. At the MEB/NARSUM evaluation on 13 April 2004, 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported inability to do simple tasks involving fine or gross motor activity of her upper extremities. The MEB physical exam noted no swelling or deformity of hand, wrist, elbow or shoulder. Range-of-motion (ROM), motor strength, sensation and reflexes were normal in both upper extremities. At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed the same month as separation, the CI reported increasing discomfort with relief achieved only with hot paraffin wax treatments or nonuse of her hands. On physical exam, some tenderness to palpation of the finger joints without swelling or deformity was reported. ROM and sensation in the hands was normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated each hand 10%, code 8715, neuralgia of the median nerve; mild IAW 4.12a. A higher rating under this code requires the condition to be of “moderate severity.” The VA rated each hand 10%, code 8515, paralysis of the median nerve, citing symptoms similar to the cubital tunnel syndrome although this diagnosis was not established. The Board next undertook to rate the left and right hand conditions.

Left Wrist Condition: The Board unanimously agreed that the record in evidence supported a 10% rating under code 8715 but not a higher rating of 20% given the normal motor and sensory examinations and unrevealing nerve conduction studies. The Board agreed that the condition rose to the level of 10% for painful motion but no higher IAW §4.40 and §4.59. Given the totality of the negative clinical evaluation, the Board found no other appropriate codes for consideration.

Right Wrist Condition: The Board unanimously agreed that the record in evidence supported a 10% rating under code 8715 but not a higher rating of 30% given the normal motor and sensory examinations and unrevealing nerve conduction studies. The Board agreed that the condition rose to the level of 10% for painful motion but no higher IAW §4.40 and §4.59. Given the totality of the negative clinical evaluation, the Board found no other appropriate codes for consideration.

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for either the left or the right wrist condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left wrist pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the right wrist pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130924, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. §  1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01790.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,








                                                              
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00178

    Original file (PD2013 00178.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was diagnosed with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and was noted to have normal X-rays. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00005

    Original file (PD2013 00005.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After two periods of limited duty(LIMDU) the case sent to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) that found the bilateral CTS to be medically unacceptable and as forwarded it to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The MEB also forwarded a right shoulder condition for PEB adjudication. Neurological exam was normal. After a thorough review of the treatment record, the Board determined that the CI’s left and right wrist conditionswere essentially non-compensable based solely...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02479

    Original file (PD-2013-02479.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB)adjudicated “bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10% for a combined 20% rating, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Bilateral CTS .The first note in the service treatment record was an electrodiagnostic study dated 29 August 2003, which was performed for the CI’s history of bilateral hand pain, tingling and numbness without neck pain. At an orthopedic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00641

    Original file (PD-2014-00641.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. She had what was diagnosed as right CTSmarked by pain and paresthesias with decreased manual dexterity along with problems of lifting and carrying, lack of stamina,and decreased strength.At the time of the VA examination, she was not employed.Temporally remote (more...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02270

    Original file (PD-2013-02270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both nerve ratings (median and ulna) under incomplete paralysis are equivalent for the “mild” (10%; independent of hand-dominance) and “moderate”(20% non-dominant and 30% dominant hand)severity levels.The Board considered if another VASRD-compliant bilateral code was applicable, or if the unfitting left arm and unfitting right arm conditions rated separately would better depicted the CI’s disability condition IAW VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations).All evidence considered there is no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00124

    Original file (PD2010-00124.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (42A, Human Resources Specialist) medically separated for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with median nerve neuropathies. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating. In the matter of the bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome condition, the Board unanimously recommends that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00323

    Original file (PD2012 00323.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the right CTS, and the chronic pain, neck and right kneeconditions as two unfitting conditions, rated 10% and 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD),and the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a 20% disability rating. Results of this EMG recorded mild bilateral CTS, chronic on left and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01078

    Original file (PD2013 01078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “left hand numbness…,” rated 10%,citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The narrative summary was dated 24 January 2006, 3 months prior to separation, and noted that the CI had persistent left elbow pain and numbness in the left 5th and 4th fingers. These included full range-of-motion of the left shoulder and elbow with normal grip...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00614

    Original file (PD2011-00614.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Shoulders (Left and Right) Condition . In the matter of the “pain left elbow, left wrist, shoulders (bilateral), and left knee; (sleep disruption)” condition, the Board unanimously recommends that the left wrist condition and sleep disorder be determined as not unfitting, and that it be rated for multiple separate unfitting conditions as follows: left elbow condition coded 8616, rated 10% IAW VASRD §4.124a and VASRD §4.71a. Right Shoulder (Major) Pain with Recurrent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00492

    Original file (PD-2014-00492.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The pain rating was mild with occasional moderate pain.At the MEB examination dated 12 April 2004, the CI reported numbness of the left hand and elbow with pins and a staple in the left wrist, while the MEB medical exam (DD Form 2808) on 20 April 2004 noted a scar on the left elbow.A permanent U3 profile was issued on 15 April 2004 for the ulnar nerve transposition with limitations of no push-ups, carrying more than 30 pounds, or constructing an individual fighting position.At the VA...