Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01564
Original file (PD-2013-01564.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01564
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141113
SEPARATION DATE: 20040908


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (31B/Military Police) medically separated for right knee pain. The knee condition did not improve adequately to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right knee condition, characterized as “right knee pain secondary to chondromalacia of the patella” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “right knee pain” as unfitting, rated at 0%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – dated 20040426
 VA – (2 mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% Right Knee Condition 5261-5010 10% 20040713
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 5 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20041105 (most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Knee Pain. In August 2000, the CI injured his right knee during a platoon run. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a meniscal tear. In February 2001, the CI had arthroscopic surgery on the right knee. After surgery, he continued to have right knee pain. Due to the chronic, persistent nature of his knee pain, an MEB was initiated. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) was dictated on 9 February 2004. At that exam, right knee range-of-motion (ROM) was 0 to 130 degrees with pain at extreme motion. Tests for ligamentous laxity were negative. There was pain with pressure on the anterior patella. Apprehension test was negative, and normal patellar tracking was noted. The examiner’s diagnosis was: right knee pain, due to chondromalacia of the patella. A month later, on 9 March 2004, knee ROM was measured and recorded. Those measurements are summarized in the chart below.

Two months prior to separation from service, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, the examiner noted that the CI was walking with a limp, and using a cane. He reported that he could walk a maximum of a half mile. On physical examination (PE) of the right knee, there was mild crepitus. Tests for ligamentous laxity were negative. The CI was able to toe walk, heel walk, and tandem walk; although he would not do so initially. The examiner opined that the CI may have desired to appear more disabled than he actually was. For Functional Assessment, the examiner wrote: “The veteran reports to be significantly disabled, however, this cannot be verified accurately on today’s exam, as his symptoms subjectively offered, seem out of proportion to his x-ray and physical findings.” The ROM evaluations, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, are summarized in the chart below.

Right Knee ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 7 mos. Pre-Sep
(20040209)		 PES ~ 6 mos. Pre-Sep
(20040309)		 VA C&P ~ 2 mos. Pre-Sep
(20040713)
Flexion (140 Normal) 130 110 99
Extension (0 Normal) 0 -10 -25
Comment Pain with motion Flexion contracture ? Flexion contracture?
invalid font number 31502
The Board carefully reviewed the ROM data from the knee examinations noted above. At the
March 2004 examination, the examining doctor mentions a flexion contracture of the right knee. However, with passive ROM testing, the right knee can be extended to 0 degrees (full extension), proving that there is no flexion contracture. Four months later, at the July 2004 VA’s C&P exam, right knee extension was listed as -25 degrees active and -20 degrees passive. These measurements again raise the question of a flexion contracture. However, the CI was able (with coaxing) to walk on his toes, walk on his heels, and tandem walk. The Board determined that it would be virtually impossible to perform those maneuvers with a unilateral flexion contracture of 20 or 25 degrees. Posture and gait at that exam were recorded as normal. The Board determined that it would be virtually impossible to have normal posture and gait with a unilateral flexion contracture of 20 or 25 degrees.

Due to the inconsistencies noted in those two exams, the Board determined that the PE with greatest probative value was the MEB NARSUM exam from 9 February 2004. That exam was very thorough and was performed by the Chief of Orthopedics. At that exam, right knee ROM was 0 to 130 degrees with pain at extreme motion. Using data from the February 2004 MEB NARSUM exam, the Board determined that the CI’s right knee condition was essentially non-compensable based on the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a diagnostic codes for loss of knee motion (5260 and 5261). However, the CI does warrant a 10% rating under code 5299-5259 (analogous to cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic). He had arthroscopic debridement of his right lateral meniscus, and after surgery continued to have knee pain. The Board could find no path to a higher rating since there was insufficient evidence of a significantly disabling knee abnormality that would justify a higher rating. After due deliberation, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% was appropriate. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 10% for Right knee pain, due to chondromalacia. It is appropriately coded 5299-5259 and IAW VASRD §4.71a, meets criteria for the 10% rating.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. Army PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy may have been operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the right knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a 10% disability rating, coded 5299-5259 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Right Knee Pain, Secondary to Chondromalacia 5299-5259 10%
RATING 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130920, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150006996 (PD201301564)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00563

    Original file (PD-2014-00563.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain5299-523710%Chronic Low Back Strain523710%20050706Left knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals L/Knee Lateral Meniscus Repair, Chondromalacia Patella5259-501410%20050706Other x 0 (In Scope)Other x 1 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050811 ( most proximate to date of separation) Low Back Pain Condition . The CI complained of dull constant pain in the left joint line and pain behind the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00093

    Original file (PD-2014-00093.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01939

    Original file (PD-2014-01939.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left knee pain . The Board determined that, since the left knee was implicated in the Physical Profile (DA Form 3349), and in the commander’s performance statement dated 10 May 2004, it was appropriate to document the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00891

    Original file (PD2012-00891.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Rating 10%* 10% Exam 20000325 20000325 BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20040302 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200891 BOARD DATE: 20130125 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC E-4 (62E/Heavy Construction Equipment Operator), medically separated for right knee injury. There was no MEB ROM evaluation. Meniscal coding...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01895

    Original file (PD-2013-01895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-500310%Retropatellar Pain Syndrome with Chondromalacia, Right Knee5099-501410%20040802Retropatellar Pain Syndrome with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01851

    Original file (PD 2012 01851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20030731 At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam (a month prior to separation), the CI was walking with a brace and had a limp of the right leg. The Board determined that potential codes for the right knee condition could include 5014 (Osteomalacia) or 5024 (Tenosynovitis), but that these would be rated under the same criteria as either code 5003 or 5019 under §4.71a at 10%.The Board considered whether a higher combined rating might be indicated under any other codes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01562

    Original file (PD-2013-01562.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain5099-50030%Degenerative Changes Left Knee5260-501010%20040915Other x 0 (Not in Scope) Combined: 0%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20041230(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) Left Knee Pain with Chondromalacia Grade 1/2 Condition . At the MEB exam, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported continuing left knee pain and recurrent episodes of locking. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01110

    Original file (PD2013 01110.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve component active duty second lieutenant (prior-enlisted)/O-1E (66H00/Registered Nurse) medically separated for chondromalacia of the left knee, diagnosed on arthroscopy, present several years, and for “major depressive disorder, atypical, known to have existed prior to service (EPTS) by history, without permanent service aggravation (PSA).”The CI enlisted in 1996 at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01830

    Original file (PD-2013-01830.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20051129VA*~1 Month Pre-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain50030%Osteoarthritis & Chondromalacia,Left Knee5010- 526010%20051228Other x 0 (Not In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00776

    Original file (PD-2013-00776.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The NARSUM conducted on 13 June 2007 (2 months prior to separation)documented constant pain rated 4/10 on average, exacerbated by “any increased activity, especially prolonged standing or walking up or down stairs.” The examiner further stated, “He denies any significant swelling of the knee, but states that it does lock up at least once or twice per day, with frequent popping.” Physical findings for the knee were not documented in the NARSUM, but measured ROM was flexion 128 degrees (normal...