Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01510
Original file (PD-2013-01510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2013-01510
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141223
SEPARATION DATE: 20040514


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Personnel Information System Management) medically separated for mixed chronic daily headaches and superimposed migraine. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty however; the CI’s profile indicated a modified physical fitness test. She was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The mixed chronic daily headaches and superimposed migraine condition, characterized as “headaches” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “mixed chronic daily headaches and superimposed migraine” as unfitting, rated 0% citing criteria of VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “My back was denied and I continue to have back issues and I was given a permanent profile for my back while in the military. I applied for stress and it was denied. I was/and now still tacit Prozac. I have migraines that continue to effect me daily. Requesting to have, my stress disorder re-evaluated. I can’t sit for too long or stand for too long. I continue to have tingling pains in my wrist, left one. My rashes continue to grow in around continue to have swollen ankles from walking (taking) fluid pills.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.








RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040128
 VA - Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Mixed Chronic Daily Headaches and Superimposed Migraine without Aura 8100 0% Recurrent Migraine Headaches 8100 10% STR
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other X 13
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50520 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Mixed Chronic Daily Headaches and Superimposed Migraine Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted the CI developed frontal headaches in June 2002 during her fourth pregnancy. Headaches were initially felt to be stress and tension related. The CI was treated with numerous medications with ineffective response or intolerance to the medication, or refusal to take medication because of pregnancy issues. A CT scan of the head, obtained on 15 September 2003, revealed only frontal sinusitis which was treated with antibiotics. On evaluation by a neurologist on 3 November 2003, the CI reported mild daily headaches which were superimposed with more severe headaches two to three times a week. These headaches were described as “sharp” and “thumping pain” associated with photo-phobia but not nausea or vomiting. The duration of the headache was until sleep. The examiner reported that the CI was under significant problems with tension at work and dealing with the demands of being in the military. He opined that ‘’there appears to be a considerable amount of external stressors at both at work and at home which contribute to headache frequency and severity.” He further noted that “unless issues at home and work are resolved, prognosis for improvement is poor and secondary gain issues will likely be important.” The neurologic physical examination was normal. A diagnosis of “mixed daily headaches with superimposed migraines without aura” was made. A magnetic resonance imaging of the head, obtained in December 2003 was normal. On a family practice visit on 10 November 2003, the CI reported that she “will live with headaches but cannot do what the army wants and would rather get a permanent profile.” The CI was offered prophylactic headache medication, but she declined as she was trying to become pregnant at the time. A commander’s statement on 10 December 2003, reported the “pain from migraines is definitely affecting her performance of duty.” On a family practice visit on 5 January 2004, the CI reported weekly headaches brought on by “wearing Kevlar, doing sit-ups, running and jogging.” At the MEB NARSUM evaluation on 7 January 2004, 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported that she had been on “quarters a lot” since onset of the headache condition. The neurologic physical exam was normal. At this time the CI was taking no headache medication. The CI did not attend a VA Compensation and Pension examination scheduled for 8 February 2005.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA both adjudicated the migraine headache condition under VASRD code 8100 (migraine) but at different rating levels. The PEB rated 0% and the VA, using service treatment records, rated at 10%. Under code 8100 a rating of 0% requires “characteristic prostrating attacks” less frequent than one in 2 months over a several month period. The next higher rating, 10%, requires “characteristic prostrating attacks” averaging one in 2 months over a several month period. The next higher rating, 30%, requires “characteristic prostrating attacks” averaging once a month over a several month period. The highest rating, 50%, requires completely prostrating attacks productive of severe economic inadaptability. The rating options under 8100 for migraine headaches, which are open to consideration in this case, rely on the frequency of “prostrating” attacks.
When rating headaches under this code, the Board, under VA guidance, uses the clear English definition of “prostrating.” The Board carefully considered the frequency and nature of the CI’s headaches including neurology evaluations, objective clinical evidence, any corroborating statements from supervisors, and placement of CI on quarters for the condition. The Board noted the record in evidence supported that the headaches were predominately of a tension/stress nature with some migraine characteristics. The Board noted the headaches, when severe, were “sharp” and “thumping” with no mention that they were overpowering, overwhelming or “prostrating.” The Board found no statements from supervisors or co-workers of episodes which could be considered “prostrating,” no documentation of withdrawal from duty for episodes of prostration and no documentation that the CI was placed on quarters for the condition in the several months prior to separation. The Board further noted the statement of the CI that she could “live with the headaches.” The Board agreed that the record in evidence did not support episodes of “prostration” from the headache condition in the several months prior to separation. The Board found no other appropriate codes for rating consideration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the consensus of the Board was that the ratable threshold was met for the 0% criteria, excerpted above; the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the headache condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the headache condition and IAW VASRD §4.124a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130914, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record






                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review





 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150008329 (PD201301510)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Enc l                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00171

    Original file (PD2012-00171.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. Migraine Headache Condition . The CI appealed and the VA Decision Review Officer (DRO) increase this to a 10% rating based VA treatment reports from August 2004 through 2005 which documented on numerous and repeated occasions of treatment for migraines to include injections.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01873

    Original file (PD2012 01873.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Migraine Headaches Condition . There is documentation that the CI had migraines prior to entry into the service; however they worsened during his service time. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 02066

    Original file (PD2013 02066.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic migraine headaches” as unfitting, rated 0%with likely application of DoDI 1332.39 and the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting and therefore not ratable. Remote VA rating dated September 2013 indicated an increased the migraine rating to 30% effective July 2012 (more than 5 years after separation).The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. BOARD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01020

    Original file (PD2013 01020.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The chest painand headache conditions, characterized as “chronic costochondritis” and “migraines with aura,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic costochondritis and migraine headaches”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%,referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy for chronic costochondritis and DoDI 1332.39 for migraine headaches.The CI made no appealsand was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01011

    Original file (PD2012 01011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “posttraumatic headaches” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI was evaluated by a civilian neurologist who noted that neurosurgery was not indicated for the Arnold-Chiari defect and further opined that the mild posttraumatic headaches were not unusual following accidents.The MEB narrative summary exam completed approximately 9 monthsprior to separation documented chronic daily posttraumatic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01400

    Original file (PD-2013-01400.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The headache condition, characterized as “chronic migraine headaches” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The CI’s civilian neurologistnoted that the CI ran out of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00647

    Original file (PD2013 00647.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At times that her headache severity was reported to be 9 out of 10 (on a 0-10 scale), she appeared to be in “no apparent distress, watching TV, and conversing normally.”The neurologist stated: “I strongly suspect her headaches are not as severe as she reports...” and “I doubt I will be able to provide any treatment that she states will be useful for headache control.”The commander’s statement on 16 June 2006 (4 months prior to separation) noted that the migraine headaches severely limited...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00750

    Original file (PD2011-00750.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was medically separated with a 0% disability rating. The CI failed to report for his VA exam on 20040729 and based upon service treatment record, the VA determined migraine headaches had existed prior to service and was not aggravated by service. In February 2004, the PEB determined that “chronic daily migraine headaches requiring dark room and quiet, one to two times a week but “not affecting daily activities” was not considered prostrating and a 0% rating was applied.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01059

    Original file (PD2013 01059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The headache condition, characterized as “chronic refractory migraine;” the neck condition, characterized as “cervicalgia;”and two other conditions (“imbalance secondary to cervicalgia” and “mild right cubital tunnel syndrome”) were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as failing retention standards.No other conditions were forwarded by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic neck pain” and “chronic headaches, occurring daily, non-prostrating”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01176

    Original file (PD-2013-01176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB) which adjudicated chronic LBP and headaches as unfitting, rated 20% and 0% respectfully; applying the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) to the LBP condition and Department of Defense Instruction(DoDI) 1332.39 to the headache condition. The examiner noted a normal spine examination at that time and included “chronic LBP” in the diagnoses. A neurology addendum to the MEB NARSUM (1.5 months prior to separation) stated that the...