Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01419
Original file (PD-2013-01419.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   CASE: PD -20 13 - 0 1419
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 4 0520
Separation Date: 20040419


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (88M / Motor Transport Operator) medically separated for right shoulder pain with instability and low back pain(LBP) without neurologic abnormality. Despite treatment and surgery, the right shoulder and back conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 / L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right shoulder and low back conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the right shoulder pain with posterior instability and LBP without neurologic abnormality as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy for rating the shoulder condition. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “VA automatically rendered these conditions at a hirer [ sic ] rate.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting right shoulder and LBP are addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040226
 VA - (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Pain (Right Shoulder) w/Posterior Instability 5099-5003 10% Right Shoulder Posterior Instability s/p Reconstructive Surgery 5202 20% 20040217
Chronic LBP 5299-5237 10% LBP 5237 Not Service Connected (NSC) 20040217
Other x 0
 Other x 0
Combined: 20%
 Rating: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040518 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD ) standards , based on ratable severity at the time of separation.
Chronic Pain Right Shoulder w/Posterior Instability . The CI developed insidious right shoulder pain and instability in January 2001. The CI underwent several intensive physical therapy (PT) treatments for right shoulder pain ; however , the goals were not met and the shoulder pain worsened . He was evaluated by o rthopedics for right shoulder pain and noted to have positive posterior instability. The o rthopedist reevaluated the right shoulder as there was no improvement after 4 months of PT. The physical exam findings were full range - of - motion ( ROM ) with limited external rotation, markedly posi tive tests for instability, with pain over the posterior aspect of the joint. The examiner diagnosed right shoulder instability, primarily posterior and inferior . A right shoulder magnetic resonance imaging showed possible mild tendonitis , but no definite tear was identified. The CI underwent a n open right shoulder posterior reconstruction with inferior capsular shift in February 2003. Post - operatively , he developed some drainage in the posterior aspect of the wound and was seen in the emergency room for treatment. He was sent to PT for post-operative treatment where the CI ’s pain improved by 20%; however , functionally he had not improved at all . The o rthopedist noted that the CI was able to do push - ups. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam prepared approximately 5 months prior to separation documented that the CI did well for approximately 6 months after his surgery ; h owever , in the 2 to 3 months prior to th at exam, the CI noticed a n onset of increasing pain and instability. He had daily pain of 5/10 . The examiner rated the pain at slight and constant according to the American Medical Association (AMA) pain scale. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The CI was given a permanent U3 / L3 p rofile for right shoulder surgery and LBP with specific restrictions of no running, jumping, rucksack , marching, push-ups and pull-ups. The c ommander’s s tatement documented t hat the CI’s shoulder pain interfered with saluting and performing his MOS duties. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam accomplished approximately 2 months after separation documented that the CI had constant recurrent right shoulder dislocation and was right - hand dominant. H is functional impairment w as an inability to engage in activities or lift heavy loads. The VA C&P exam findings are summarized in the chart below .

There were two goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Right Shoulder ROM(Degrees) MEB 5.40 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P 2.10 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (180 Normal) 145 90
Abduction (180) - 70
Comments
Right hand dominant		 Pos. p ain limited motion & posterior apprehension sign; Pos. subluxation of glenohumeral joint ; 1+ sulcus sign(positive inferior instability) ; Normal strength Pos. pain limited motion ; H umeral head dislocates inferiorly with abduction ; No Deluca criteria
§4.71a Rating 20% (PEB 10%) 20%
invalid font number 31502
The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the c hronic p ain with p osterior i nstability as 5099 - 5003 ( degenerative a rthritis ) rated at 10% with application of the USAPDA pain policy. The VA coded the r ight sh oulder p osterior i nstability status post r econstructive s urgery condition as 5202 ( other impairment of the humerus ) rated at 20% , consistent with infrequent episodes of dislocation and guarding of movement only at shoulder level. All exams f or the right shoulder were adjudged to meet the intent of §4.59, painful motion. The CI’s primary problem was the right shoulder instability and the 5202 code provides a more accurate description of the CI‘s duty limiting disability. Rating shoulder instability under code 5202 requires judging the frequency of any dislocations and the amount of “guarding” present with shoulder motion. The evidence does not contain documentation of “frequent dislocation with guarding of all shoulder movements” as required for the highe r 30% rating . A ll other evaluation levels are 20%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20 % for the c hronic p ain with ri ght s houlder p osterior i nstability coded 5202 .

Chronic LBP Condition : The CI developed chronic LBP as a result of a slip and fall on 11  December 2002 where the small of his back hit against the curb in a parking lot. He was evaluated by p rimary c are and diagnosed with acute LBP. He was evaluated by PT and was found to have an antalgic gait with pain on ROM . The MEB NARSUM exam documented that the CI had LBP symptoms approximately once a month and then it would last 2 to 3 days rated 8/10 in severity and the pain would spontaneously resolve over 2 to 3 days. The examiner rated the pain according to the AMA pain scale at slight and intermittent. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The CI was given a permanent U3 / L3 p rofile for right shoulder surgery and LBP with specific restrictio ns of no running, jumping, ruck sack marching, push-ups and pull-ups. The CI underwent an updated PT ROM MEB exam in February 2004, approximately 2 months prior to separation . The exam findings are summarized in the chart below . At the C&P exam , the CI characterized his pain as squeezing, burning aching, sharp pain which occurred twice per week and lasted for 4 days and rated the pain at 8/10. The pain was elicited by activity and relieved by rest. However, at the time of pain , the CI reported he could function with medication and stated his condition did not cause incapacitation. T he functional impairment was an inability to lift heavy objects. The exam revealed the CI had no complaints of radiating pain on movement, muscle spasm was absent, no tenderness was noted and negative bilateral straight leg raise. Full ROM without pain, fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance or incoordination was also noted. The C&P exam findings are summarized in the chart below. There were two goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the following chart :

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) NARSUM 5. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep PT ROM’s 2 Mos . Pre-Sep VA C&P 2 Mo s . P re -Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) To eight inches from the floor 70 90
Combined (240) 220 240
Comment N or m a l side/back bending; Minimal tenderness to palpation ; N o muscle spasm; Normal strength - Normal exam; motor/sensory intact
§4.71a Rating 10% 10% NSC

The Board direct ed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the c hronic LBP condition a s 5299 analogous to 5237 ( l umbosacral or cervical strain ) rated at 10% citing a combined thoracolumbar ROM of 220 degrees. The VA coded the l ower b ack p ain condition as 5237 and determined it was not service-connected The g eneral r ating f ormula for d iseases and i njuries of the s pine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “With or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The PT exam met the forward flexion and combined ROM criteria for the 10% rating . The C&P exam was 8 days prior to the PT evaluation and the CI’s exam was normal. The VA did not grant service - connection for the back pain citing, “We have denied service connection for lower back pain because there is no evidence of any diagnosis of chronic injury or disease to account for your reported symptoms.” Soon after separation, the CI was employed as a security guard for Walmart and then employed performing general yard maintenance, reporting only shoulder complaints impact ing his ability to perform this job. The CI was never evaluated for his back by the VA after separation. The Board deliberated on VASRD §4.31 , a 0% rating versus a 10% rating. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.31 (a 0% rating) , Board consensus was that a 0% rating for the c hronic LBP condition is the most appropriate recommend ation in this case.

BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the right shoulder condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the c hronic p ain with r ight s houlder p osterior i nstability , the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20 %, coded 5202 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the c hronic LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board , by a majority vote, recommends a 0% rating . The single voter for dissent elected not to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
C hronic Pain Right Shoulder w/Posterior Instability 5202 2 0%
Chronic L ow B ack P ain 5237 0%
COMBINED 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130917 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record








                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150006339 (PD201301419)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability description without modification of the combined rating or recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01187

    Original file (PD 2013 01187.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Shoulder Pain5099-50030%Left Shoulder Pain, History of Dislocation5202-502410%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x7 Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060921 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. Chronic Left Shoulder Pain Condition . ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01982

    Original file (PD 2014 01982.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00677

    Original file (PD 2014 00677.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20071031 The Board considers VA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. The CI was given a temporary U3 profile for left shoulder pain; however, there were no associated limited duties.The CI underwent a diagnostic arthroscopy with debridement of the shoulder labrum on 24 January 2007.Throughout 2007, the CI was treated by PT for chronic left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01366

    Original file (PD-2013-01366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Shoulder Pain5099-500310%Residuals of Remote Left Shoulder Injury; S/P Reconstruction520120%20100420Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 520100420 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100614 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board notes the earliest VA evaluation was over 5 years after the date of separation. DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02281

    Original file (PD-2013-02281.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service IPEB – Dated 20041221VA - (At Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain523710%Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), Lumbar Spine523710%VARD*No Additional MEB/PEB ConditionOther x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 10% *VARD dated 20050418 based the rating on evidence found in the evidence & VA C&P dated 20010117 which was not available for review ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00026

    Original file (PD2010-00026.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The anxiety condition was rated by the VA at 30% within three months of separation. Other Conditions. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the PDBR Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00463

    Original file (PD 2014 00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition was not considered by the PEB. The pain was rated at 9 out of 10. The MEB NARSUM examiner documented chronic left knee pain that was medically managed.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00532

    Original file (PD2012-00532.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW The Board further notes the significant interval (>3 years) between the date of separation and the DVA evaluation. The initial PEB rating and the VA rating were under the code 5201 (limitation of motion).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01525

    Original file (PD-2014-01525.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The CI was given a permanent U3 profile for cervical degenerative disease (neck pain) and another medical condition, with a Code C and specific restrictions noted on the profile.The VA C&P exam approximately 2 months prior to separation documented that the CI reported...