Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01297
Original file (PD-2013-01297.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-01297
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150714
SEPARATION DATE: 20040902


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-2 (Infantryman) medically separated for diabetes. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). He was issued a permanent profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition “insulin dependent diabetes type I” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “type I diabetes mellitus [DM]” as unfitting, rated 20%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI made no contention.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON

IPEB - Dated 20040730
 VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Type I Diabetes Mellitus 7913 20% Diabetes Mellitus 7913 20% STR
Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 5 (equals SC, NSC & deferred)
RATING: 20%
 RATING: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 41027 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ) . The e arliest VA Compensation and Pension evaluation is dated 20100422 (5½ years post-separation).



ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Diabetes Mellitus. The service treatment record (STR) corroborates the history in the narrative summary (NARSUM) of an emergency presentation in February 2004 (six months pre-separation) which resulted in a diagnosis of DM (glucose 800) and hospitalization (one day). The CI was placed on insulin (>1 dose daily) and dietary regulation. There were a few episodes of hypoglycemia early on (two documented in STR) which were associated with running and did not require hospital admission. There were subsequently three documented emergency visits for treatment of hyperglycemia which did not result in hospital admission. Later entries document adequate glucose control (100-120) and good exercise tolerance (walk and run at own pace); and, there were no further hypoglycemic episodes. There is no documentation in the STR or NARSUM of hospital admissions other than the initial one, and no indication of semi-monthly visits to a diabetic care provider. The NARSUM was conducted 10 June 2004 (11 weeks pre-separation), and documented the above clinical course; specifying the absence of any systemic complications of DM. There was no temporally probative VA or other post-separation evidence in this case (see footnote, rating comparison chart).

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The VASRD §4.119 language under code 7913 (diabetes mellitus) for the ratings under consideration is excerpted below for reader convenience.
                  Requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities with
                           episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions requiring one
                           or two hospitalizations per year or twice a month visits to a diabetic
                           care provider, plus complications that would not be compensable
                           if separately evaluated .................................................................... . .... 60 %
                  Requiring insulin, restricted diet , and regulation of activities ................. ...... .40%
                  Requiring insulin and restricted diet, or; oral hypoglycemic agent
                           and restricted diet ............................................................................... 20 %
Both the PEB’s DA Form 199 and VA rating decisions cited the insulin requirement and dietary restrictions as the criteria for their 20% determinations. The VA rater specifically excluded the need for regulation of activity (based on the same service evidence as that of the PEB). Although it is clear that the CI had to temper strenuous activities such as running to avoid hypoglycemic reactions, the evidence indicates that routine activities were unaffected after the insulin requirement and dietary management were stabilized. Members thus agreed that the 40% criterion of regulation of activities was not satisfied by the evidence. Although some of the 60% criteria were in evidence, regulation of activity (as just addressed) is a requirement; and, the criteria for frequency of provider visits and separately compensable complications are not in evidence. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the DM condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the diabetes mellitus condition and IAW VASRD §4.119, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.



RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130912, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record



        





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review





        



SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150015903 (PD201301297)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01132

    Original file (PD-2013-01132.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. It is appropriately coded 7913, and IAW VASRD §4.119, meets criteria for the 60% rating level due to requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities; with an episode of ketoacidosis, which required hospitalization, plus complications that would not be compensable if separately evaluated. In the CI’s treatment record, there was not sufficient...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00957

    Original file (PD-2014-00957.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Diabetes Mellitus Type 1791320%Diabetes Mellitus I791320%20080923Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x1 Combined: 20%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01445

    Original file (PD2012-01445.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 20% disability rating. CI CONTENTION: “The 20% rating does not fit the disability, Type I Diabetes with controlled diet, restricted activities, and insulin dependent starts at the 40% rating. 3 PD1201445 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02660

    Original file (PD-2013-02660.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01765

    Original file (PD-2012-01765.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) evaluation (2 months prior to separation) documented “frequent variations in his blood sugar ... though ... no major reactions for hypoglycemic or ketoacidosis type;” specifying dietary limitations, but stating “not restricted in his activities as a result of the diabetes;” and, noted that “He sees the diabetic care provider every six weeks to two months.” if separately evaluated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00736

    Original file (PD2012-00736.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I have to take shots 4 times a day, strenuous activities cause me to have periods of hypoglycemia at work and during various activities outside of work. The PEB rated the CI’s Type 1 DM, requiring Insulin and restricted diet coded 7913 DM at 20%. The CI contended that he requires regulation of activity in order to control his DM.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01778

    Original file (PD-2014-01778.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20051012 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00783

    Original file (PD2011-00783.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB and VA both rated the diabetes condition under VASRD code 7913, diabetes mellitus, but at different ratings. There was no evidence in the service treatment records that indicated medical restriction of normal activities including athletic was required. The PEB and VA both rated the condition 0% code 6200, chronic right mastoiditis.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02244

    Original file (PD-2013-02244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20091009VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Diabetes Mellitus, Type I791320%Diabetes Mellitus, Type I791320%**STROther x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 0STR Combined: 20%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100226 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01175

    Original file (PD 2013 01175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-01175BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20140326 SEPARATION DATE: 20050912 I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.