RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201901
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20130320
SEPARATION DATE: 20031226
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (63W/Wheeled Vehicle Repair) medically
separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The back condition began in 2001 and was treated
with medication and acupuncture. Despite treatment, the CI did not improve adequately to
fully perform his military duties or meet physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent
L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded chronic LBP
and mild degenerative disk disease (DDD) as not meeting retention standards IAW AR 40-501.
No other conditions were forwarded for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB
found the chronic LBP unfitting and rated it 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically
separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: Multiple connections leading to and including sleep apnea that originated
from the service connected disability of degenerative disk disease also force me to not get a
good nights sleep with a sleep aide. The sleep aide
[sic]. The application continues with
contentions including the already quoted sleep apnea, stress/anxiety, migraines and hearing
issues, concluding with
I believe all of these things should be re-evaluated and I deserve a
higher percentage overall.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Boards scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, and
paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for
continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by
the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. Ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed
in all cases. The rated, unfitting condition of chronic LBP meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI
6040.44 for Board purview. The requested sleep apnea, anxiety, migraine and sleep conditions
were not identified in the PEB and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the
Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application or otherwise outside the
Boards defined scope of review remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for
Correction of Military Records. The Boards authority is limited to making recommendations on
correcting disability determinations. The Boards role is therefore confined to the review of
medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations,
compared to the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standard,
based on ratable severity at separation.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB Dated 20030912
VA (1 Week Pre-Separation)
Condition
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
Chronic LBP
5299-5295
10%
Bulging Disc L5-S1*
5242
10%
20031029
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Other x 1
20031029
Combined: 10%
Combined: 10%
VARD 20031217 (most proximate to Date of Separation) * Later changed to DDD with Lumbar Strain, kept 10% rating.
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI's contention that disability ratings
should have been conferred for other conditions. While the Disability Evaluation System
considers all of the CIs medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those
conditions that cut short a members career, and then only to the degree of severity present at
the time of final separation. The Veterans Administration, however, is empowered to
compensate for service-connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions,
and adjust the CIs disability rating should the degree of impairment change over time.
Low Back Pain (LBP). The CI injured his back during physical training in April 2000. Many
different treatment options were tried; including medications, acupuncture, and physical
therapy (PT). However, in spite of treatment, the LBP persisted and an MEB was initiated. The
MEB clinical evaluation was in January 2003, 50 weeks prior to separation. The CI reported that
his pain was exacerbated by certain activities like running, jumping, lifting, or marching.
However, there were no limitations in activities of daily living. Physical examination showed
some tenderness to palpation (TTP) in the L5-S1 region. On forward bending, his fingers came
to within 6 inches of the floor. Trunk rotation was functional. In the lower extremities, active
range-of-motion (ROM) was full. Neurological exam was normal, and straight leg raise (SLR)
was negative. On 29 October 2003, 8 weeks prior to separation, the CI had a VA Compensation
and Pension (C&P) exam. He reported that he could walk two miles before pain occurred. For
exercise he was doing upper body weight training. He denied ever being on bed rest or missing
work. Gait and posture were normal. Neurological exam was normal. Goniometric evaluation
of the back revealed essentially full ROM of the lumbosacral spine, but no actual measurements
were documented by the examiner. There was subjective TTP over the entire lumbosacral
spine and both sacroiliac joints, but no paraspinal muscle spasm. Toe-walk, heel-walk, and
tandem walk were all normal. Neurological exam was normal.
The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its
rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Army PEB and VA chose different
coding options for the LBP condition, but both assigned a rating of 10%. The PEB used VASRD
code 5299-5295 (analogous to lumbosacral strain). The VASRD coding and rating standards for
the spine were modified in September 2002, and then were changed to the current standards
in September 2003. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must use the VASRD coding and rating
standards which were in effect at the time of the CIs separation. Based on the evidence in the
treatment record, the Board unanimously agreed that the CIs low back condition would best
be coded as 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine), and rated at 10%. This coding and rating
option is most appropriate to the CIs underlying spinal pathology. The code used by the PEB
was no longer a valid VASRD code at the time of separation. All clinical data in evidence are
consistent with a 10% rating under the VASRD General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries
of the Spine. There was no evidence of incapacitating episodes, nor was there sufficient
evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment. The Board discussed other reasonable coding
options, but could not find a path to a rating higher than 10%. After due deliberation,
considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board
unanimously recommends a disability separation rating of 10% for the LBP condition. It should
be appropriately coded 5242, IAW §4.71a of the VASRD in effect at the time of the CIs
separation from service. As noted above, the code used by the Army PEB was no longer a valid
VASRD code at the time of separation.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the
chronic LBP, the Board unanimously recommends a separation disability rating of 10%, coded
5242 IAW §4.71a of the VASRD in effect at the time of separation. There were no other
conditions within the Boards scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CIs prior determination be
modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain
5242
10%
COMBINED
10%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121031, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-
3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130007797 (PD201201901)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Boards recommendation to modify the individuals disability description
without modification of the combined rating or recharacterization of the individuals
separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this
memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00426
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic LBP condition with lumbar spondylosis, and bulging disc as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The final orthopedic consultation noted normal lumbar spine appearance, ROM, no tenderness and no spasm, with normal gait and stance and recommended referral to the MEB. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXX,...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01463
The back condition, characterized as “Chronic Low Back Pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501; and no other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain” as unfitting, rated 10%,with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeal and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20041026VA -No C&P availableConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02000
SEPARATION DATE: 20050622 The Board considered that the MEB exam, although closest to the date of separation, did not align with the more severe disability picture and limited ROMs noted in the service treatment record through multiple treatment episodes. The PT and chiropractic exams, coupled with the continued limited motion noted on the DD Form 2808 closer to separation, provided reasonable doubt of greater ROM limitation than that documented at the NARSUM.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02692
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Therefore, based on a thorough review of the evidence in the treatment record, the Board determined that, at the time of separation, a 20% disability rating was appropriate for the CI’s chronic back condition. BOARD...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01924
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201924 SEPARATION DATE: 20060626 BOARD DATE: 20130319 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (11B/Infantry) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). CI CONTENTION: The Army rated my Radiculopathy and Lumbar facet together as the VA. RECOMMENDATION: The Board,...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01989
SUMMARY OF CASE :Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (96B20/Intelligence Analyst) medically separated for chronic radiating low back pain. The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain”, “spondylolisthesis L5 on S1” and “bilateral pars interarticularis defects,” wasthe only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01529
The brain trauma and incontinence conditionswere not identified by the MEB or PEB and thus,they are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.These and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the BCMR. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01942
In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability separation rating of 20%, coded 5242, IAW VASRD §4.71a. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic, radiating low back pain 5242 20% COMBINED 20% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121008,...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02943
The Informal PEB adjudicated his back condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). IPEB – Dated 20081120VA* - Service Treatment Records (STR) and VA RecordConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP with DDDat L3-4 and L4-55299-524310%DDD, Lumbar Spine52420%Missed ExamAdjustment DisorderNot CompensablePost-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)941110%20100805Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 4 RATING: 10%RATING: 20%...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02151
BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the chronic back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the...