Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01901
Original file (PD-2012-01901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

 

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201901 

BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20130320 

SEPARATION DATE: 20031226 

 

 

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this 
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (63W/Wheeled Vehicle Repair) medically 
separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The back condition began in 2001 and was treated 
with medication and acupuncture. Despite treatment, the CI did not improve adequately to 
fully perform his military duties or meet physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent 
L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded chronic LBP 
and mild degenerative disk disease (DDD) as not meeting retention standards IAW AR 40-501. 
No other conditions were forwarded for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB 
found the chronic LBP unfitting and rated it 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically 
separated with a 10% disability rating. 

 

 

CI CONTENTION: “Multiple connections leading to and including sleep apnea that originated 
from the service connected disability of degenerative disk disease also force me to not get a 
good night’s sleep with a sleep aide. The sleep aide… ” [sic]. The application continues with 
contentions including the already quoted sleep apnea, stress/anxiety, migraines and hearing 
issues, concluding with “…I believe all of these things should be re-evaluated and I deserve a 
higher percentage overall.” 

 

 

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, and 
paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for 
continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by 
the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. Ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed 
in all cases. The rated, unfitting condition of chronic LBP meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 
6040.44 for Board purview. The requested sleep apnea, anxiety, migraine and sleep conditions 
were not identified in the PEB and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the 
Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application or otherwise outside the 
Board’s defined scope of review remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for 
Correction of Military Records. The Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on 
correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is therefore confined to the review of 
medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, 
compared to the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standard, 
based on ratable severity at separation. 

 

 

RATING COMPARISON: 

 

Service PEB – Dated 20030912 

VA – (1 Week Pre-Separation) 

Condition 

Code 

Rating 

Condition 

Code 

Rating 

Exam 

Chronic LBP 

5299-5295 

10% 

Bulging Disc L5-S1* 

5242 

10% 

20031029 

No Additional MEB/PEB Entries 

Other x 1 

20031029 

Combined: 10% 

Combined: 10% 



VARD 20031217 (most proximate to Date of Separation) * Later changed to DDD with Lumbar Strain, kept 10% rating. 


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI's contention that disability ratings 
should have been conferred for other conditions. While the Disability Evaluation System 
considers all of the CI’s medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those 
conditions that cut short a member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at 
the time of final separation. The Veterans’ Administration, however, is empowered to 
compensate for service-connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions, 
and adjust the CI’s disability rating should the degree of impairment change over time. 

 

Low Back Pain (LBP). The CI injured his back during physical training in April 2000. Many 
different treatment options were tried; including medications, acupuncture, and physical 
therapy (PT). However, in spite of treatment, the LBP persisted and an MEB was initiated. The 
MEB clinical evaluation was in January 2003, 50 weeks prior to separation. The CI reported that 
his pain was exacerbated by certain activities like running, jumping, lifting, or marching. 
However, there were no limitations in activities of daily living. Physical examination showed 
some tenderness to palpation (TTP) in the L5-S1 region. On forward bending, his fingers came 
to within 6 inches of the floor. Trunk rotation was functional. In the lower extremities, active 
range-of-motion (ROM) was full. Neurological exam was normal, and straight leg raise (SLR) 
was negative. On 29 October 2003, 8 weeks prior to separation, the CI had a VA Compensation 
and Pension (C&P) exam. He reported that he could walk two miles before pain occurred. For 
exercise he was doing upper body weight training. He denied ever being on bed rest or missing 
work. Gait and posture were normal. Neurological exam was normal. Goniometric evaluation 
of the back revealed essentially full ROM of the lumbosacral spine, but no actual measurements 
were documented by the examiner. There was subjective TTP over the entire lumbosacral 
spine and both sacroiliac joints, but no paraspinal muscle spasm. Toe-walk, heel-walk, and 
tandem walk were all normal. Neurological exam was normal. 

 

The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its 
rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Army PEB and VA chose different 
coding options for the LBP condition, but both assigned a rating of 10%. The PEB used VASRD 
code 5299-5295 (analogous to lumbosacral strain). The VASRD coding and rating standards for 
the spine were modified in September 2002, and then were changed to the current standards 
in September 2003. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must use the VASRD coding and rating 
standards which were in effect at the time of the CI’s separation. Based on the evidence in the 
treatment record, the Board unanimously agreed that the CI’s low back condition would best 
be coded as 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine), and rated at 10%. This coding and rating 
option is most appropriate to the CI’s underlying spinal pathology. The code used by the PEB 
was no longer a valid VASRD code at the time of separation. All clinical data in evidence are 
consistent with a 10% rating under the VASRD General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries 
of the Spine. There was no evidence of incapacitating episodes, nor was there sufficient 
evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment. The Board discussed other reasonable coding 
options, but could not find a path to a rating higher than 10%. After due deliberation, 
considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board 
unanimously recommends a disability separation rating of 10% for the LBP condition. It should 
be appropriately coded 5242, IAW §4.71a of the VASRD in effect at the time of the CI’s 
separation from service. As noted above, the code used by the Army PEB was no longer a valid 
VASRD code at the time of separation. 

 

 

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the 
chronic LBP, the Board unanimously recommends a separation disability rating of 10%, coded 


5242 IAW §4.71a of the VASRD in effect at the time of separation. There were no other 
conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be 
modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: 

 

UNFITTING CONDITION 

VASRD CODE 

RATING 

Chronic Low Back Pain 

5242 

10% 

COMBINED 

10% 



 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121031, w/atchs 

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record 

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 

 

 

 

 

 

 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF 

 Acting Director 

 Physical Disability Board of Review 

 


SFMR-RB 


 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency 

(TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-
3557 

 

 

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation 

for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130007797 (PD201201901) 

 

 

1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of 
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the 
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, 
I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability description 
without modification of the combined rating or recharacterization of the individual’s 
separation. This decision is final. 

 

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be 
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum. 

 

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided 
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have 
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this 
memorandum without enclosures. 

 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

 

 

 

 

Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

 Deputy Assistant Secretary 

 (Army Review Boards) 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00426

    Original file (PD-2012-00426.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic LBP condition with lumbar spondylosis, and bulging disc as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The final orthopedic consultation noted normal lumbar spine appearance, ROM, no tenderness and no spasm, with normal gait and stance and recommended referral to the MEB. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXX,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01463

    Original file (PD-2013-01463.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The back condition, characterized as “Chronic Low Back Pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501; and no other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain” as unfitting, rated 10%,with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeal and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20041026VA -No C&P availableConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02000

    Original file (PD-2013-02000.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050622 The Board considered that the MEB exam, although closest to the date of separation, did not align with the more severe disability picture and limited ROMs noted in the service treatment record through multiple treatment episodes. The PT and chiropractic exams, coupled with the continued limited motion noted on the DD Form 2808 closer to separation, provided reasonable doubt of greater ROM limitation than that documented at the NARSUM.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02692

    Original file (PD-2014-02692.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Therefore, based on a thorough review of the evidence in the treatment record, the Board determined that, at the time of separation, a 20% disability rating was appropriate for the CI’s chronic back condition. BOARD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01924

    Original file (PD-2012-01924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201924 SEPARATION DATE: 20060626 BOARD DATE: 20130319 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (11B/Infantry) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). CI CONTENTION: “The Army rated my Radiculopathy and Lumbar facet together as the VA. RECOMMENDATION: The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01989

    Original file (PD-2013-01989.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE :Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (96B20/Intelligence Analyst) medically separated for chronic radiating low back pain. The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain”, “spondylolisthesis L5 on S1” and “bilateral pars interarticularis defects,” wasthe only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01529

    Original file (PD2012 01529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The brain trauma and incontinence conditionswere not identified by the MEB or PEB and thus,they are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.These and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the BCMR. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01942

    Original file (PD-2012-01942.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability separation rating of 20%, coded 5242, IAW VASRD §4.71a. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic, radiating low back pain 5242 20% COMBINED 20% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121008,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02943

    Original file (PD-2014-02943.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated his back condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). IPEB – Dated 20081120VA* - Service Treatment Records (STR) and VA RecordConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP with DDDat L3-4 and L4-55299-524310%DDD, Lumbar Spine52420%Missed ExamAdjustment DisorderNot CompensablePost-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)941110%20100805Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 4 RATING: 10%RATING: 20%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02151

    Original file (PD-2013-02151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the chronic back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the...