Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00685
Original file (PD-2012-00685.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

 BRANCH OF SERVICE:   ARMY  
SEPARATION DATE:  20020701 

 
NAME:  XXXXXXXXXXXX                                                      
CASE NUMBER:  PD1200685 
BOARD DATE:  20121204 
 
 
SUMMARY  OF  CASE:    Data  extracted  from  the  available  evidence  of  record  reflects  that  this 
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E‐5 (63Y20/Track Vehicle Mechanic), medically 
separated for chronic left calf strain.  The condition began as a result of injury in 1997 and was 
not associated with a surgical indication.  The CI did not improve adequately with treatment to 
meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical 
fitness standards.  He was issued a permanent L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation 
Board (MEB).  The MEB forwarded chronic left calf strain to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) 
as  medically  unacceptable  IAW AR 40‐501.    The  MEB  forwarded  no  other conditions  for  PEB 
adjudication.  The PEB adjudicated the left calf condition as unfitting, rated 0% with application 
of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).  The CI made no appeals, and 
was medically separated with a 0% disability rating. 
 
 
CI CONTENTION:  The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application. 
 
 
SCOPE OF REVIEW:  The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined 
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the 
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.”  The ratings 
for  unfitting  conditions  will  be  reviewed  in  all  cases.    Any  conditions  or  contention  not 
requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain 
eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. 
 
 
RATING COMPARISON: 
 

VA (14 Mos. Post‐Separation) – All Effective Date 20020702

Combined:  0% 

*Diabetes Mellitus Type II diagnosis effective 20030520; combined 40% 
 
 
ANALYSIS  SUMMARY:    It  is  noted  for  the  record  that  the  Board  recognizes  the  significant 
interval (14 months) between the date of separation and the first VA evaluation.  DoDI 6040.44, 
under which the Board operates, specifies a 12‐month interval for special consideration to VA 
findings.    This  does  not  mean  that  the  VA  information  was  disregarded,  as  it  was  a  valuable 
source  for  clinical  information  and  opinions  relevant  to  the  Board’s  evaluation.    In  matters 
germane to the severity and disability at the time of separation, however, the information in 

Service IPEB – Dated 20020327 
Condition 

Code 

Chronic Left Calf Strain 

5099‐5021 

↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ 

Rating
0% 

Condition

Residuals, Left Lower Extremity 
Stress Fracture
Diabetes Mellitus Type II*
Lumbar Strain
Aortic Arteriosclerosis, 
Hypertension, Myocardial 
Infarction

Code 

5299‐5262 

7913 
5295 

Rating 
10% 
20% 
10% 

Exam

20030924 
20030924
20030924

7101‐7007 

10% 

20030924 

0% X 1

Combined:  30% 

20030924

the service record was assigned proportionately more probative value as a basis for the Board’s 
rating recommendations. 
 
Left Calf Condition.  The left calf condition began in 1997 while running.  Evaluation in 1997 
with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a hematoma under the medial aspect of the 
calf suggestive of a muscle tear.  Initial splinting, ongoing activity restrictions, physical therapy 
and medications did not alleviate the pain that continued to arise from activity.  A bone scan 
and  electrophysiological  studies  of  the  leg  in  March  2000  were  normal.    A  physical  therapy 
follow‐up  evaluation  performed  on  11  September  2001  documented  ankle  dorsiflexion  of  20 
degrees  (normal  to  20  degrees).    A  clinic  follow  up  on  25  September  2001  noted  decreased 
strength of the left leg.  At the narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 months 
prior to separation, the CI reported left leg pain exacerbated by running, jumping, marching, 
riding  in  tactical  vehicles  and  prolonged  standing.    Examination  revealed  diffuse  mild  calf 
tenderness.  The ankle exhibited 0 degrees of dorsiflexion.  Gait was not mentioned.  At a VA 
clinic  follow‐up  on  27  March  2003,  the  CI  reported  exercising  almost  every  day.    At  the  VA 
Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam 14 months after separation, the CI reported continuous 
pain during exercise activities and fast walking on a treadmill to less than one mile.  He noted 
pain severity of 2‐3 on a 0‐10 point scale with weakness and stiffness.  Exercise or heavy lifting 
caused the pain to flare to 4‐5/10.  Such flare ups occurred once per week and lasted for 1 or 2 
days.    Examination  revealed  a  normal  gait.    There  was  no  calf  tenderness  or  painful  motion 
noted.  X‐rays showed benign appearing cortical thickening of the proximal medial tibia.  The 
examiner  concluded  that  the  CI  suffered  the  sequelae  of  a  stress  fracture  condition.    At  a 
second VA exam on the same date, the CI reported no lost time from work as a full time truck 
mechanic.    Examination  revealed  a  normal  gait  with  no  use  of  ambulatory  aids.    Range‐of‐
motion (ROM) of the left knee and ankle was normal (ankle dorsiflexion 20 degrees).  There was 
no swelling, tenderness or atrophy of the leg.  Distal pulses were normal.  A third concurrent 
C&P examiner reported that the CI had no restriction of activities.  He performed fast paced 
treadmill walking of less than one mile 2‐3 times per week, and could walk at a slow pace for 
40‐50 minutes.  Muscle strength of the lower extremities was normal. 
 
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.  The 
PEB’s 0% rating was assigned under the 5021 code (Myositis).  This coding approach is based on 
limitation of motion, but the only ROM in evidence prior to separation was ankle dorsiflexion, 
which  the  NARSUM  examiner  noted  to  be  abnormal.    Board  members  agreed  that  this 
limitation supported a 10% rating, and also concluded that there was ample evidence of pain 
with use to justify a 10% rating under §4.40.  The VA’s 10% rating under the analogous 5262 
code  (tibia  and  fibula,  impairment  of)  was  based  on  an  assessment  of  “slight  knee  or  ankle 
disability.”  The Board agreed that a higher rating under the 5262 code was not warranted.  Due 
to the symptoms of muscle pain, the Board considered rating under a muscle disability code 
(5311,  muscle  group  XI),  but  concluded  that  the  condition’s  severity  was  not  more  than 
“moderate” under that pathway, and thus did not justify a rating greater than 10%.  Finally, the 
Board deliberated a peripheral nerve code (8721, neuralgia of common peroneal nerve), but 
agreed  this  approach  provided  no  avenue  to  a  higher  rating.    After  due  deliberation, 
considering  all  of  the  evidence  and  mindful  of  VASRD  §4.3  (reasonable  doubt),  the  Board 
recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic left calf strain condition. 
 
 
BOARD FINDINGS:  IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent  with  the  VASRD  in  effect  at  the  time  of  the  adjudication.    The  Board  did  not 
surmise  from  the  record  or  PEB  ruling  in  this  case  that  any  prerogatives  outside  the  VASRD 
were exercised.  In the matter of the chronic left calf strain condition, the Board unanimously 

   2                                                           PD1200685 
 

recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099‐5021 IAW VASRD §4.71a.  There were no 
other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. 
 
 
RECOMMENDATION:  The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as 
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: 
 

VASRD CODE  RATING
5099‐5021 
COMBINED 

10%
10%

Chronic Left Calf Strain 

UNFITTING CONDITION

 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
Exhibit A.  DD Form 294, dated 20120610, w/atchs 
Exhibit B.  Service Treatment Record 
Exhibit C.  Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SFMR‐RB 
 

 
 

 

 

 

           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF 
           President 
           Physical Disability Board of Review 

 
 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency  

(TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA  22202‐3557 

SUBJECT:  Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation  

for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120022727 (PD201200685) 

1.  I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review 
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.  

Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,   I accept the Board’s 

recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization 

of the individual’s separation.  This decision is final.   

2.  I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected 

accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.    

3.  I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the 
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and 

to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures. 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

   3                                                           PD1200685 
 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

Encl 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

     XXXXXXXXXX 

 
     Deputy Assistant Secretary 
         (Army Review Boards) 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
CF:  

(  ) DoD PDBR 

(  ) DVA 

 

   4                                                           PD1200685 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00718

    Original file (PD2010-00718.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was then medically separated with a 20% combined disability rating. ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Right Lower Extremity8799-872520%Healing Osteochondritis Dissecans s/p Arthroscopic Procedures with Reflux Sympathetic Dystrophy ligamentous injury, limitation of motion, muscle weakness and altered sensation of the right ankle, foot and lower leg, atrophy of the right calf, and residual tender scars5299-526250%*20090202Numbness/Nerve Pain In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00394

    Original file (PD2012-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ Normal) Extension (0⁰ Normal) Comment PT ~7 Mo. Symptoms included ankle popping (predominately right); shin pain knees pop and can swell; with “knees and ankles are stiff and weak and his legs can give out.” The examiner stated “He has generalized and multiple symptoms regarding the lower extremities and it is difficult to sort them out specifically on taking the history.” The examiner indicated there was no foot condition; there was bilateral shin pain and right...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00721

    Original file (PD-2014-00721.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner’s diagnoses were due to shrapnel blast injuries: permanent sciatic nerve damage left leg (peroneal and tibial nerves) with right foot and ankle complete weakness; shrapnel injuries to bilateral knees; right ankle anterior tibialis tendon subluxation and ankle instability; and, shrapnel wounds to both lower extremities. The VA rated the left sciatic neuropathy together with “ left knee pain from shrapnel” and “left ankle pain from shrapnel/tendon sublux” with code 8520 at 60%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01684

    Original file (PD-2014-01684.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain Left Leg5099-500310%Periostitis with Left Leg Traction (claimed as shin splints and left leg pain)50220%20040831Left Knee Strain5024-526110%Left Foot S/P Third Metatarsal Stress Fracture5299-52830%Other x0Other x 0 Rating: 10%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050314 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY : Chronic Pain Left Leg Condition . Six months prior to separation,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00741

    Original file (PD2012 00741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Not Service Connected x 4 Combined: 20% *Initial rating of 0% for left tibia stress fracture increased to 10% based upon appeal by CI and records review by VA ANALYSIS SUMMARY : Chronic Bilateral Leg Pain Secondary to Chronic Bilateral TibialStress Fractures Condition . To that end, the evidence for the chronic left and chronic right leg pain conditions are presented separately with attendant recommendations regarding separate unfitness and separate ratings if indicated.The Board first...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00762

    Original file (PD-2014-00762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Anterior Lower Leg Pain with Swelling5399-531010%Nerve Damage to Right Leg with Swelling8599-8521NSC20110621Aching Joints and Muscle Pain5099-5025NSC20110621Arthralagias, Both Knees5009NSC20110621Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 9 20110621 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20090714(VARDclosest to DOS). Right Anterior Lower Leg Pain with Swelling (Right Leg) Condition .The CI had continuous...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00872

    Original file (PD2012-00872.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. RATING COMPARISON: ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, resides in evaluating the fairness of Disability Evaluation System fitness determinations and rating decisions for Service IPEB – Dated 20011012 Condition Pain and Loss Motion Left Ankle...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01968

    Original file (PD-2014-01968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI stated “please consider all conditions.” He could heel-and-toe walk with pain (which would indicate full strength of the leg muscles). The Board found no evidence for a higher rating in the CI’s favor under applicable codes including paralysis, neuritis, or neuralgia.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01428

    Original file (PD 2012 01428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201428 SEPARATION DATE: 20080305 BOARD DATE: 20130130 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (35T10/Military Intelligence System Maintenance), medically separated for a left ankle injury prior to entry on active duty with tearing of ligaments and fracture of the fibula. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02258

    Original file (PD-2013-02258.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Ankle Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...