Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00384
Original file (PD2011-00384.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xxxxxxxxxxxx BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army

CASE NUMBER: PD1100384 SEPARATION DATE: 20090526

BOARD DATE: 20120601

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSG/E-6 (11B, Infantry) medically separated for right pubic osteitis. He was treated, but did not improve adequately to fully perform his military duties or meet physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent profile, and was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Right pubic osteitis was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Eight other conditions, identified below, were listed on the DA Form 3947 as not disqualifying. The PEB found the right pubic osteitis unfitting, and rated it 10% IAW the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The other eight MEB/PEB conditions were all adjudicated as not unfitting. The CI made no appeals, and was thus medically separated with a 10% disability rating.

CI’s CONTENTION: “I was rated 90% through the VA. My rating from the Army did not include everything that was affected by the injury incurred.”

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review, as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. In this case; right pubic osteitis, hearing loss, patellofemoral syndrome (PFS), concussion, left hip pain, and stress reaction were judged to meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview, and are addressed below. Hemorrhoids, allergic rhinitis, old left leg fracture (1984), and tinnitus are outside the Board’s scope of review, but remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).

RATING COMPARISON:

Army PEB – dated 20090317 VA (6 mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective 20090527
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Pubic Osteitis 5099-5003 10% Pubic Osteitis 5016-5010 10% 20091123
Hearing Loss Not Unfitting Tinnitus 6260 10% 20091123
Patellofemoral Syndrome Not Unfitting Rt. Patellofemoral Syndrome 5010 10% 20091123
Left Patellofemoral Syndrome 5010 10% 20091123
Concussion Not Unfitting Residuals of TBI 8045 70% 20091123
Left Hip Pain Not Unfitting Degenerative Changes of L Hip 5252-5010 10% 20091123
Hemorrhoids Not Unfitting Hemorrhoids 7336 0% 20091123
Allergic Rhinitis Not Unfitting Allergic Rhinitis 6522 0% 20091123
Reaction to Chronic Stress Not Unfitting No VA Entry for Stress Reaction
Fracture of Left Leg (1984) Not Unfitting Fracture of Left Tibia and Fibula 5010-5262 10%
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ PTSD 9411 30% 20091123
0% X 3 / Not Service-Connected x 3 20091123
Combined: 10% Combined: 90%

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Pubic Osteitis. In July 2007, the CI injured his right pelvis while he was deployed to Afghanistan. After return to the U.S. a bone scan showed pronounced uptake in the right pelvis, and he was diagnosed with right pubic osteitis. The injury was treated conservatively, with physical therapy (PT) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In spite of treatment, his pain persisted and an MEB was initiated. At his December 2008 MEB exam, the CI reported pain in the right groin and right hip. The pain was 2/10 at rest, and 4/10 with activity. His pain improved with stretching, but was worse with cold weather. He denied any swelling or redness of the affected area. There was marked tenderness to palpation (TTP) of the right pubic ramus. Both hips had full range-of-motion (ROM), but the right hip was painful with motion. As noted above, the Army PEB found him unfit due to right pubic osteitis. He was separated from service on 26 May 2009. Six months later, at his November 2009 VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, the CI’s gait and posture were normal. He reported that he was using acetaminophen (Tylenol) & ibuprofen (Motrin) to help control the pain. Examination of the right hip was within normal limits. X-rays showed mild degenerative changes at the symphysis pubis.

The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available, and noted that the right hip had full ROM, and therefore failed to reach compensable levels for the VASRD codes specific to the hip & thigh (5250 through 5255). Thus there was no compensable ROM impairment for the right hip. However; IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45 and §4.59, a 10% rating is warranted when there is satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major joint. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence, and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 10% for the right hip condition, IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, §4.59, and §4.71a.

Left hip condition. The Board then directed its attention to the left hip. At his Army MEB exam, the CI reported that he was having some left hip pain. It was adjudicated by the PEB as not unfitting. In November 2009, 6 months after separation, the CI complained of his left hip giving way about two to three times per month. He reported that the left hip was worse with cold and dampness. The CI was not using any assistive devices for ambulation. Gait and posture were normal, and there was no evidence of acute distress. On examination of the left hip, there was good ROM, but the CI did have pain with motion, especially internal rotation. The Board’s first charge with respect to the left hip condition is an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (Reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The left hip condition was not implicated in the commander’s statement or noted as failing retention standards. There was no indication from the record that it significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting reversal of the PEB fitness adjudication for the left hip condition.

Remaining Conditions. Hearing loss, patellofemoral syndrome (PFS), concussion, and stress reaction were all adjudicated by the PEB as not unfitting. Just as with the left hip pain, the Board must assess the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication of these other remaining conditions. None of these other conditions were implicated in the commander’s statement or noted as failing retention standards. They were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no indication from the record that any of these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting reversal of the PEB fitness adjudication for any of these other PEB conditions. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the right pubic osteitis, and IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, §4.59, and §4.71a; the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the left hip pain, hearing loss, PFS, concussion, and stress reaction; the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB determination as not unfitting.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Pubic Osteitis 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED 10%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20110513, w/atchs

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

SFMR-RB

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency

(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120011832 (PD201100384)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.

This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Deputy Assistant Secretary

(Army Review Boards)

CF:

( ) DoD PDBR

( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01154

    Original file (PD-2014-01154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Examination noted normal lumbar spine ROM with pain and normal bilateral hip ROM.An orthopedic evaluation on 27 March 2009, 5 months prior to separation, noted a 16-month history of pelvic pain following pregnancy. At...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01437

    Original file (PD 2012 01437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020716 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Bilateral Inferior Pubic Ramus Stress Fractures, X- Ray Verified with Other Lower Extremity Stress Reactions on Bone Scan 5299-5010 0% Stress Fracture Left Tibia 5299-5262 0% 20021217 Stress Fracture Right Tibia 5299-5262 0% 20021217 Bilateral Pelvic Stress Fractures 5299-5255 Non Service Connected (NSC) 20021217 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The PEB combined the bilateral inferior pubic ramus...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01941

    Original file (PD2012 01941.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left hip was painful to motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130019920 (PD201201941)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01337

    Original file (PD-2013-01337.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Hip and Bilateral Knee pain5099-50030%Residuals, Left Hip Stress Fracture5099-501010%20011212Right Knee Chondromalacia5099-501010%20011212Left Knee Chondromalacia5099-501010%20011212Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 2 RATING: 0%RATING: 30% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20020708(most proximate to date of separation(DOS)) Left Hip and Bilateral KneePain .This CI entered the Army in May 1999. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01021

    Original file (PD2011-01021.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The rating for the unfitting bilateral hip condition is addressed below; and, no additional...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01532

    Original file (PD-2012-01532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If he known he had caught something in the shower he would’ve filed for it at [the] time.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The rating for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02381

    Original file (PD-2014-02381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At the time of separation, the CI’s right hip condition was not compensable above the 10% level based on the evidence present for review. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00692

    Original file (PD-2012-00692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the left hip and lower extremity pain condition as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam prior to separation, the CI reported pain in her low back that radiated into her buttocks which had been diagnosed as left ischial tuberosity syndrome. However, the Board notes the evidence supports primarily left hip exam findings to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01711

    Original file (PD 2012 01711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the matter of the pelvic stress fracture condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Stress Fracture of Inferior Pubic Ramus 5099-5022 0% COMBINED 0% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120717,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01906

    Original file (PD2012 01906.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A third and final MEB in October 2002 forwarded the bilateral knee condition, characterized as bilateral patellofemoral syndrome, status post(s/p) left patellar tendon to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) IAW 1850.4E.The MEB also identified and forwarded left shoulder superior labral tear, s/p arthroscopic repair and left hip greater trochanteric bursitis for IPEB adjudication. The IPEB adjudicated bilateral patellofemoral syndrome (PFS) as unfitting, rated 10%, with application...