Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00030
Original file (PD2009-00030.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY

CASE NUMBER: PD0900030 BOARD DATE: 20090903

SEPARATION DATE: 20070721

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an Army Reserve officer who was medically separated in 2007 after 8 years of combined service. The medical bases for the separation were a left knee condition and PTSD. He was first deployed to OIF in 2003. He suffered a meniscal injury to his left knee requiring arthroscopic repair consequent to that deployment, although it did not result in medevac or medical separation. He had a 10% VA rating for the knee prior to a second deployment (OIF 2006-07). During the second deployment, he re-injured the same knee with additional meniscal damage. He underwent arthroscopic repair in country, but eventually required medevac. Despite conservative management and additional arthroscopic interventions, the knee could not be rehabilitated adequately for retention and he underwent an MEB. The CI was treated as an outpatient for PTSD during his first deployment, but his symptoms stabilized on return. They re-surfaced during the second deployment. There were numerous combat substrates for PTSD during both deployments. He was managed in theater for PTSD during the second tour and refused a suggestion that he defer further combat missions. He continued outpatient management and required medication for the PTSD after medevac to CONUS for the knee condition. The PTSD condition was deemed not medically acceptable by psychiatry and was included with the knee condition as a PEB referral on the DA 3947. The PEB found him unfit for both conditions and he was medically separated at a combined disability of 20%.

________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: The CI contends for rating left knee and PTSD conditions equivalent to the VA.

________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB VA (4 Mo. after Separation)
PEB Condition Code Rating Date Condition Code Rating Exam Effective
CHRONIC LEFT KNEE PAIN DUE TO LEFT LATERAL MENISCAL DAMAGE 5099- 5003 10% 20070620 INSTABILITY, LEFT KNEE 5257 20% 20071129 20070721
LEFT KNEE POST-OPERATIVE 5258 20% 20071129 20070721
PTSD 9411 10% 20070620 PTSD 9411 30% 20071211 20070721
NO ADDITIONAL DA 3947 ENTRIES. NON-PEB X 2 20071129 20070721
TOTAL Combined: 20% TOTAL Combined (Includes Non-PEB Conditions): 70%

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

PTSD. The 10% PEB rating was based on DoDI 1332.39 (E2.A1.5). Under the DoDI, the case is an appropriate fit with the 10% criteria. Under the VASRD, the clinical picture would have met criteria for a 30% rating. This is moot, since PDBR adjudication at 50% TDRL for 6 months supersedes IAW DoDI 6040.44 and DOD guidance. The primary source for approximating a 6 month permanent rating recommendation was the initial VA psychiatric rating examination performed at 5 months after separation. The CI’s symptoms at that time were typical of PTSD, moderately acute and constant. He was employed as a government contractor, although had difficulty with group interactions. His marriage was intact, but strained. Social activities were restricted. He was being treated with 2 psychotherapeutic medications. Global functioning was rated in the mildly dysfunctional range. His impairment exceeded the ‘mild or transient’ and ‘only during periods of significant stress’ requirements for the 10% rating. The VA rating based on the 5 month exam was 30%, connoting ‘occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks’. He met all of the ‘due to’ descriptors except panic attacks for the 30% rating. He did not meet the ‘reduced reliability and productivity’ threshold for the 50% rating, and only a minority of the ‘due to’ descriptors. The VA rating of 30% at 5 months is supported by the facts and consistent with the VASRD. Assuming no change in condition over the interim month, 30% is a fair permanent rating recommendation in this case.

Left Knee. The PEB rated the knee under the general arthritis 5003 code. A 10% rating would follow from this code and does not reflect influence by the USAPDA pain policy. The VA rated the knee under both the 5257 (instability) code and the 5258 code for meniscal injury. This is IAW promulgated VA policy that instability is coded separately when it coexists, and that it does not constitute pyramiding. The MEB and VA rating examinations for the knee differed in range-of-motion (ROM) findings. The MEB goniometric exam measured 145⁰ (normal) flexion, stipulating ‘limited by pain’. The VA examiner described 90⁰ flexion (still within the 10% rating criteria). The NARSUM did not comment on stability, but other entries in the service treatment record (STR) documented mild lateral instability. The VA examiner described ‘slight’ medial and lateral instability. Neither exam noted an effusion or severe tenderness. The VA examiner commented on frequent locking of the knee; the MEB examiner did not. One note in the STR did describe ‘occasional’ locking. The VA examiner noted daily ‘giving way’ of the knee and use of a brace. The VA rater invoked these entries in assigning a 20% rating for instability. Neither of these issues was noted in the MEB physical exam, NARSUM or elsewhere in the STR.

Regarding coding, Board practice is to follow the VA precedent for rating knee instability separately. This is also IAW VASRD §4.7 (higher of 2 evaluations). The relatively mild physical instability of the knee documented on all examinations does not correlate well with the severity of instability connoted in the history recorded by the VA examiner or with necessity for a brace. Although additional rating for instability was indicated, the 20% rating applied by the VA appears to overstate the severity. A fair recommendation is 10% under 5257. The frequency of locking, especially in the absence of an effusion, required for the 5258 code and consequent 20% rating is not well supported in the STR. The more appropriate separation rating is 10% under the 5259 code.

Other Conditions. The CI was additionally rated by the VA for service-connected low back pain and a right knee condition. Neither was addressed in the NARSUM nor forwarded to the PEB on the DA 3947 from the MEB. Low back pain, but not the right knee, was noted by the CI on his MEB physical. Spine and right knee exams were documented as normal. The NARSUM and VA rating exams specified normal ROM and essentially benign exams of the contralateral knee. Neither condition is noted in the medical profiles. Neither the back nor the right knee ratings applied by the VA meet a reasonable threshold for Board recommendation as additions to the combined separation rating. The CI does not contend for them.

________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the PDBR to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 for rating PTSD was apparent in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by this Board. In the matter of PTSD, the Board unanimously recommends an initial rating of 50% in retroactive compliance with VASRD §4.129 as directed, and a 30% permanent rating at 6 months IAW §4.130. In the matter of the left knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends separately added ratings of 10% under 5237 and 10% under 5239. In the matter of the back and right knee conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no separation ratings as additionally unfitting conditions.

________________________________________________________________


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE TDRL RATING

PERMANENT

RATING

PTSD 9411 50% 30%
CHRONIC LEFT KNEE PAIN DUE TO MENISCAL DAMAGE 5257 10% 10%
LATERAL INSTABILITY, LEFT KNEE 5259 10% 10%
COMBINED 60% 50%

________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20070721, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00092

    Original file (PD2013 00092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as left knee severe degenerative joint disease (DJD), left knee anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, left knee lateral meniscus tear and medial meniscus tear, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. He had further knee re-injuries after the first two surgeries. The operative report described severe chondromalacial changes in the lateral compartment with osteophytic ridging in the patellofemoral joint, medial,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01924

    Original file (PD-2013-01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I was just rated for knee and two knee surgeries. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20050810VA* -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain…5099-500320%Osteoarthritis, Left Knee, Status Post Two ArthroscopicSurgeries501010%STROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING: 20%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060628(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00229

    Original file (PD2012 00229.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The single voter for dissent (who recommended a separate left knee 20% and right knee 10% rating)submitted the appended minority opinion.In the matter of the contended asthma, LBP and OSA conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the determinations as not unfitting.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. The AO therefore recommends that each joint be separately rated as follows: an unfitting left knee condition coded 5010-5258...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01982

    Original file (PD2012 01982.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “ left knee pain and osteoarthritis, status post (s/p) arthroscopic debridement” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR40-501. The PEB adjudicated “ tricompartmental osteoarthritis left knee with meniscal tear/degeneration” as unfitting, rated 10%citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The PEB adjudicated the three other conditions, obesity, hypertension, and allergic rhinosinusitis as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01076

    Original file (PD2013 01076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION :“PEB rating of 20% w/disability discharge should have been at least 30% - VA Disability Rating of 30% upon review of military records.” Slight instability of the medial collateral ligament of the left and right knee was reported. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01629

    Original file (PD-2013-01629.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Patellofemoral Pain, Bilaterally… 5099-50030%Patellofemoral Syndrome…Left…525710%20050514Patellofemoral Syndrome…Right…52580%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 Combined: 0%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050608 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB combined the bilateral knee pain conditions as a single unfitting condition rated at 0%, coded 5099-5003 (analogous to degenerative arthritis).The PEB relied on AR 635.40...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00858

    Original file (PD2012-00858.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions forwarded to the PEB were left knee medial meniscus tear and left knee patellar chondromalacia. The PEB adjudicated the left knee condition as not unfitting and recommended the CI was “Fit to Continue on Active Duty.” The CI requested a Records Review Panel reconsideration of his case and filed a 2 page statement outlining why “the findings are not compatible with the evidence provided and the condition I currently have.” The Records Review Panel agreed with the CI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00045

    Original file (PD2011-00045.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Knee Condition . Any impairment from Osgood-Schlatter’s or knee pain of the right knee was considered above. Right Knee Chondromalacia5009-500310% COMBINED10% ______________________________________________________________________________

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01110

    Original file (PD2013 01110.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve component active duty second lieutenant (prior-enlisted)/O-1E (66H00/Registered Nurse) medically separated for chondromalacia of the left knee, diagnosed on arthroscopy, present several years, and for “major depressive disorder, atypical, known to have existed prior to service (EPTS) by history, without permanent service aggravation (PSA).”The CI enlisted in 1996 at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01594

    Original file (PD2012 01594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: CASE: PD1201594BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20130418 Physical Disability Board of Review SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010178 (PD201201594)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.