Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00312
Original file (FD-2015-00312.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)      GRADE
(b) (6)
TYPE GEN         x        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL  NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION      AODRESS ANO OR ORGANIZATION OF COUSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x
x x x x
ISSUES   A94.55   lNOEX NUMBEJt    A60.00   EXHIBITS SUBMIITED TO THE BOARD 
l ORDER APPOINTlNG THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVfEW OF DISCHARGE
LETIER OF NOTIFICATION
BRrEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

06 Aug 2015      FD-2015-00312
APPLICl\NT'SISSlre AND Tli2 BQAJU>"S DECISIONA.L MTlONA.L.ll NillDISCUSSW ON nre ATTACJiJ!D A.Ill PORC6 DISCHAROe R,l;Vl)!W BQAJU> DECISIONAL RATIONAL6.

Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.









(b) (6-


INDORSEMENT      -
DATE: 8121/201        

TO:      FR0 1:
SAF/MRBR         SECR.E'TARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUllCIL
AIR FORCE DISCMARGE REVlEWBOARD
550 C STR EET WEST.SUITE 40      IS!S COM.MANO DR.El': WINC,3RD Fl..OOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742      ANDREWS AFB.MO i076l-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2015-00312

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: The appl icant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Unsatisfactory Performance

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant 's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included one Article 15, four Letters of Reprimand and one Letter of Admonishment. Her misconduct included failing to go to prescribed appointed place of duty; absenting herself from duty; failing to check in and out before and after work; derelict in performing duties (3x's); failing to complete training.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of her discharge. The applicant cited her desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, she signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on November 5, 2004) that she understood she must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact from the loss of these benefits to the applicant; however, this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

Inview of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00592

    Original file (FD-2014-00592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeof the discharge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrderandDiscipline.TheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00471

    Original file (FD2008-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL The American Legion . ~ see ee ees MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ L — _ | —__| [ xt X*t+ X*+ ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION (a BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00651

    Original file (FD-2014-00651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicant wasofferedapersonalappearance beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeISSUE: Theapplicantreceived aGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractionsThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00121

    Original file (FD-2013-00121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicant appealstochangethereasonand authorityforthe discharge. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel, at AndrewsAFBon11June2015.Apersonalstatementandarevisedpersonal statementweresubmittedat thehearing.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingto thedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddenies thechangeofreasonandauthorityfor dischargeandchangeof reenlistment code.TheBoard findstheapplicant...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00767

    Original file (FD-2014-00767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorableTheapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00092

    Original file (FD-2009-00092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” VOTE OF THE BOARD a HON GEN UOTHC OTHER [ DENY xX x x x x ISSUES 4.94.95 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 BS Oo CEXETBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD oe LI JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD __ _ 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_ [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION _ 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-00092 APPL! FINDING: The Board denies the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00686

    Original file (FD-2014-00686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrder andDisciplineTheAirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2012-00648

    Original file (FD-2012-00648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDi"AMt OF SERVICtMEMBER(LAST,FIRST MIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE(b)(6)TYPE GEN I PERSONALAPPEARANCE x I RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAMEOFCOUNSELANOORORCANIZ.\TION ADDRESSANO ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL YES No x .... .... .... MEMBERSITTING l!ON OEN UOTl lC OTlIER DENY (b)(6) x - ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM B&R A67. 10 EXHIBITSSUBMlTTEDTOTH'.E BOARD 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHE BOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOF DISCHARGELEHEROFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETO...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00545

    Original file (FD-2008-00545.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSN/SSAN NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION VOTE OF MEBs GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY _ EXHIBITS SUBM ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds that neither the evidence of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00376

    Original file (FD-2010-00376.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity...