Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00070
Original file (FD-2014-00070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOA RD H EARING RECORD
i'iAME Of SERVICE i.\'fEMBER (UST. FIRST MIDDLE IMTIAL)   GRADE
{b} (6)
TYPE     x        I . PERSONAL APPEARANCE         I        RECORD REVI EW
COUNS£L   NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORCAJl/IUTION     ADDRESS AND OR ORCANl7..A11011/ OF COUNSEL
YES      11/o
x
VOTEOFTHE BOARD
MEM BER ITTING  HON      GEN      UOTllC   OTHER    DENY
{b} {6}      x
x

x
x
x
ISl>llES         A94.05   lDE:< N 18ER    A66.00   EXHIBITS SUBMITfED TO THE BOARD
l ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF :-IOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE     CASE NU18ER

29 Jun 2015      FD·20 l4-00070
Al'PIXAST S lSSllt.A". D1llE BOARD'S DEClSIONALRATIOSA.1..EARE DISCUSSW OSlHEATTAOIED AIR FORCE DISCHAAGERE\'lEWBOARD DECISIONAL RATl<l'IAl..E   ;
'
Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, and the right to subm it an application to the AFBCMR.









{b} (6)    -

INDORSEMENT      DATE: 711312015
TO:      FROM:
SECRETARY Of"TILEAIR FORCE rt!RSONN£l. COU!"Cl l.
AIR FORCE DISO,IARCE Rt:VIEW BOARD
SSO C STREET WEST, SUITE 40      IS» COMMAND OR. CE\\ ING, JRD t"'LOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150742        A:>'DREl\'S AFB.MD l0762-7001


A FHQ FORJ'\1 0-2077, JAN 00      (EF·V2)   Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00070

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to General.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at Andrews AFB on June 29, 2015.

There were no additional exhibits submitted at the hearing.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief.

ISSUE: The applicant received an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge for misconduct - Drug Abuse

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. In order to adhere to Mental Health Amendments to 10 USC 1553, a physician with specialized training on mental health disorders was present for this board. The applicant's record of service included three Article l 5s and one Letter of Counseling. His misconduct included sleeping on duty; failure to wear individual protective equipment; use of marijuana on divers occasions; providing alcoholic beverages to underage individuals and failure to refrain from possessing or consuming alcoholic beverages in the dorm.

The applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He stated that after deploying to Iraq and the passing of his great-grandmother, he had difficulties with handling stress and sleeping. The applicant feels that his mental health and sleep issues were directly related to his misconduct. After review of the records and advice from the mental health specialist, the DRB found sufficient mitigation based upon the applicant's overall duty performance and the compelling statements of the applicant to grant an upgrade. Although the Board does not condone applicant's misconduct , the Board majority finds his discharge harsh.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant's service is more accurately reflected by an Under Honorable Conditions (General) under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00642

    Original file (FD-2014-00642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00053

    Original file (FD-2015-00053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoGeneral.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00481

    Original file (FD-2014-00481.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicant wasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00116

    Original file (FD-2015-00116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00165

    Original file (FD-2015-00165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEl. ITIAL) GRADE (b) (6) TYPE I PERSONALAPPEARANCE x I RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAMEOFCOUNSEL ANOORORGANIZATION ADDRESS ANO ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELYES No x(b) (6)MEMBERSITTINGVOTEOFTHEBOARDISSUES A93.24 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 EXHlBITSSUBMITTEDTOTHEBOARD ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD APPL!CAT!ONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETTEROFNOTrFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00236

    Original file (FD-2013-00236.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, atAndrewsAFBonJune04,2015.Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthehearing:Exhibit #5: Applicant'sContentions/additional supportingdocumentsTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00579

    Original file (FD-2014-00579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetoHonorableandtochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00614

    Original file (FD-2014-00614.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00773

    Original file (FD-2014-00773.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforchangeofthereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00556

    Original file (FD-2014-00556.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...