Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00579
Original file (FD-2014-00579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
 AME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITlAL)       GRADE
 (b) (6)
 TYPE GEN         I        PERSONAL APPEARA NCE   x        I        RECORD REVIEW
 COI.INSEL        NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION      ADDRESS AND OR ORGANl7.ATION OP COUNSEL
 YES      No
 x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  X*

X* X*
X* X*
ISSUES   A93.23   INDEX NUlBER     A67.10   EXHIBITS SUBMITIED TO THE BOARD
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIB ITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONA L APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARISG DATE     CASE NUMBER

03 Jun 2015      FD-2014-00579
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND nlE BOARD·s DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON nlE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE R£V16W BOAJlD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.


*Narrative




(b) (6)





TO:



SAF/MRBR

INDORSEMENT





AIR fORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40      1535 COMMAl\1> DR,EE WING. JRO FLOOR
RAN DOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742      ANDREWS AFB. MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Prev ious



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE		 CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00579

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsi bility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. In order to adhere to Mental Health Amendments to l 0 USC 1553, a physician with specialized training on mental health disorders was present for this board. The applicant 's record of service included four Letters of Repri mand, and three Letters of Counseling. His misconduct included dereliction of duty (2x), failure to go to duty (2x), falsifying two documents, failure to update phase flow slides as required, failure to bring profile for a fitness assessment, and failure to update flying hours slide with most current data.

The applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He stated that he suffered from anxiety and depression that caused extreme sleep deprivation and anxiety attacks. He claims that his infractions were directly related to his condition. After review of the records and advice from the Mental Health Specialist, the ORB found no evidence that the applicant suffered from any major depressive disorders. There was no indication that the applicant had any mental health issues that directly contributed to his misconduct. The administrative actions taken against the applicant gave ample opportunities for him to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterizat ion and narrative reason of the discharge recei ved was found to be appropriate.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record , the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization or narrative reason for discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authori ty, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remai n unchanged.


Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00642

    Original file (FD-2014-00642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00497

    Original file (FD-2014-00497.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereview becompleted basedontheavailable servicerecord. Theattached brief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingto thedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00556

    Original file (FD-2014-00556.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00521

    Original file (FD-2013-00521.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FlRsrMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUJ\'SELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY ISSUESA93.23INDEXNUMBERA66.00A67.0S1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTiiEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTED ATTlMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBERlOJan2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00780

    Original file (FD-2014-00780.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00681

    Original file (FD-2014-00681.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischarge forMisconduct...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00334

    Original file (FD-2014-00334.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceived aGeneral...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00403

    Original file (FD-2014-00403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE:The applicant receivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00649

    Original file (FD-2013-00649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge to Honorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractions ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00614

    Original file (FD-2014-00614.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.