Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00193
Original file (FD-2014-00193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (IAST, FIRST MlDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
Al'SN/SSAN



X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORCAJ\117.ATION Of COUNSEL



MEMBER SITIING

HON

GEN      UOTHC
OTHER    DENY
x x x x
x

ISSUES   A94.S3

INDEX NllMBER

A66.00


1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDJNG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HtAIUNG DA.Tl!   CASE NUMBER

04 Sep 2014      FD-2014-00193
: ,' •   : , ' 11        1i l1 ,         1,• ' \ " • 7, '         ,1 -: 1 1        ,        -- - ,   < I ,        -, . ' I         d ,r      , .· ,    •        



• >      '        '        •         '.       •         - ,     •         A        -
Case beard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.










TO:

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150.4742

SECl\ETARY OFTltt AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMANDDR,EEWING, 3RDROOR
ANDREWS AFB. MD 207617HI


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00        (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00193

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct: Drug Abuse.

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant's record of service included one Letter of Reprimand. His misconduct included failure to report to duty after a medical appointment, lying to a SNCO, and drug use.

The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct: Drug Abuse. The applicant never received any paperwork for his drug use. However, during an interview by OSI, the applicant admitted to using spice on numerous occasions between on or about 1 August 2010 and on or about 17 October 2010. This use was a violation of a lawful general order, to wit: AFI 44-121, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment, dated 9 June 2010. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that he was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the discharge was appropriate. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does submit that he sees the mistakes that he made but the upgrade to his discharge would be helpful to his current situation. The Board found that the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00193_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00193_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableandtochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestsfortheupgradeofthedischarge,andtochangeofreasonandauthorityfor dischargearedenied. ISSUE: Applicant...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00334

    Original file (FD-2010-00334.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for the discharge and change of reenlistment code. ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct: Drug Abuse. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his two years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00233

    Original file (FD-2010-00233.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct — Drug Abuse. Notwithstanding the applicant’s claim that this was an isolated incident, the Board found the seriousness of drug abuse affords the commander authority to pursue administrative discharge to uphold good order and discipline, regardless of whether or not the member has an otherwise clear record. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00665

    Original file (FD-2013-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge tohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00498

    Original file (FD-2013-00498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAME OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSAN x PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY A92.21•vv.001 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE 3 LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCE TAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00688

    Original file (FD-2014-00688.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgrade ofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00064

    Original file (FD-2009-00064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00401

    Original file (FD-2014-00401.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,and tochange thereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereview becompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00007

    Original file (FD-2010-00007.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN t TYPE UOTHC PERSONAL APPEARANCE x | RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY - ee eee Xx xX x ‘ Xx : xX ISSUES AOI 25 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 A85.01 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A94.05 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00220

    Original file (FD-2013-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEForPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCE TAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENU!\:IBER12May2014 FD-2013-00220CaseheardinWashington,D.C.Adviseapplicantofthedecisionof theBoardandthe righttosubmitanapplicationtotheAFBCMR. TO•SAF/MRBR550CSTREET WEST,SUITE40 RANDOLPHAFB,TX78150-4742 SECRETARYOF THEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCIL...