Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00785
Original file (FD-2013-00785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE



PERSONAL APPEARANCE
x        RECORD REVIEW



S       No
x
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COONSEL


MEMBER SITTING

HON
x x x x
x
GEN      UOTHC

011-IER

DENY


A67.10
A49.00   1 ORDER APPOINTING TllE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LE1TER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSE L'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSON AL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING or PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


llf.ARINC DATE

CASE NUMBER

13 Mar 2014      FD-2013-00785

       
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an appl ication to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.











SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY Of Tm:AIR FORCE P(KSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE l>ISCHARCt REVIEW BOARD
l!\JSCOMMAND OR. tE WINC.JRO t'LOOR ANDREWSAFB.MO 217'2-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00  (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00785

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief.

ISSUE:   Applicant received a General discharge for Unsatisfactory Performance - Failure to Progress and Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because he was not given a fair chance to progress. The records indicated the applicant failed to obtain a passing score on his career development course (CDC) on 16 May 2002 and then again on 6 August 2002. Additionally, he received four Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, and one Record of Individual Counseling. His misconduct included failed to comply with lawful order to clean finger nails, failed to go to duty on time (3x), reported to duty in dirty uniform, and failed to maintain government quarters by not cutting the grass (2x). After a complete and thorough review of the records the Board found that was applicant was given a fair chance to progress. However, determined that based on the very minor nature of his misconduct a General service characterization was too harsh.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant's service is more accurately reflected by an Honorable discharge under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00785

    Original file (FD-2014-00785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservice record.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGenerald ischargefor Misconduct-MinorDisciplina ryInfractionsThe AirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00799

    Original file (FD-2013-00799.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDREARINGRECORDNAMEOF SER -MBER(LAS'r,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE ··APPEARANCE J---COON5*'" -tNAMI:OPCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONVltS No xx RECORD REVIEW ADDRESSk'iDORORGANIZATIONOFCOU"'5£LVOTEorTHEBOARJrMEMBER SITTINGUOTHCOTHERDENYX* CASE l'IU•1BER 27Mar2014FD-2013-00799TllE80ARl>'SDECISIONAL RATIONALEAREDISCUSSED ON t;.r/.CHEl>AIR rot>.CEDISCHAAGEJliVlliW B()AJU) DECISIOMAL llA1101'/.U:.CaseheardinWashington,D.C.Advise applicantof thedecisionof...

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00356_13

    Original file (FD-2012-00356_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANTYPE GEN PERSONALAPPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELAND ORORGl\J'llZATION x RECORDREVIEW ADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIO!<OFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUES i il jlIl A93.01A93.33 A94.05 ORDERAPPOfNTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELflLE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCEX*+ X*+ X*+X*+ X*+TAPE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00303_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00303_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonand authority forthedischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailable servicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00812

    Original file (FD-2013-00812.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICE MEMBER(LASr,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRA DE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARAi'fCE X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS MID ORORGANIZATION OFCOU£L xMEMBERSITTINGHON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENYISSUESA94.55AOl .07INOn NUMBERA67.IOA49.001 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHE BOARDAPPLICATION FOR REV IEW OFDISCHARGELETI"ER OFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S REl..EASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONAL EXHIBITSSUBMITTED ATTIME OF PERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00668

    Original file (FD-2013-00668.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethe reenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequesttochangethereasonandauthorityfordischargeandtochangethereenlistment codeisdenied. ISSUE: Applicant received...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00266_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00266_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEW BOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVIEAFSN/SSANADDRESS ANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELUOTHCOTHER DENY1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPERECORDING OFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASENVMBER19Jul2013 FD-2013-00266...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00283_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00283_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDBEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINmAL)GRADEPERSONALAPPEARANCE x RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOfCOUNSEL Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) MEMBERSI1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAR.INCDATE CASENlJMBER19Jul2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00325_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00325_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable, tochangethereason and authority forthedischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailable servicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoardgrantstherequestedrelief. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00625_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00625_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x•+ x•+x•+x•+A67.JO1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRJEFOF PERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATI! *NarrativeReason andAuthority+RECodeTO:SAF/MRBR 550 CSTREETWFST,SUITE40RANDOLPHAFB,TX 781504742SECA£TARV or THEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCIL AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD ICOMMANDDR,££ WING, 3RD...