Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00695
Original file (FD-2013-00695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AJR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE    AFSNJSSAN



PERSONAL APPEARANCE
X        RECORD REVIEW



vtS      No
x

ADDRESSAND OR ORCA,.,17.ATION Of COUKSEL


MEMBER SITTING

HON
OEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
x x x
x
x


A62.00

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REV IEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LElTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL 'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMnTED AT TIME Of PERSONAL APPEARA NCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


llEARINC UATC    Ci'SE NUMUO:R

13 Mar 2014      FD-2013-00695

       
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a persona l appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.











SAFIMRBR
550 CSTREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY Of THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIRFORCE OISCHARCC REVIEW 801'1U> IS.15 COMMAND OR. EE WINC.lRD FLOOR ANDRE WS Af"ll,MO 201'2 7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00695

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Fraudulent Entry

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The specific reason for the discharge was based on the applicant deliberately leaving pertinent information regarding his criminal background off his request for security clearance (SF86). He states his recruiter completed all of his paperwork and he believed his recruiter has access to all of his criminal records. After a complete and thorough review of the records, the Board found the applicant's contentions to have no merit. The applicant's SF86 was completed on 1 October 2009 and did not indicate that the applicant had any criminal background. The applicant signed the form on 1 October 2009, indicating it was a true and accurate statement. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00695

    Original file (FD-2014-00695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReview Board (ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00104_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00104_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at AndrewsAFB on10Oct2013.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforFraudulentEntryApplicantcontendsdischargewasinequitablebecauseitwastooharsh. Therecordsindicatedtheapplicant omittedor...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00137 1

    Original file (FD-2009-00137 1.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    REQUESTING COPIES OF MILITARY RECORDS Pricr to applying for discharge review, potential applicants or their designated representatives may obtain copies of their military personnel records by submitting a Standard Form (SF) 180, Request Pertaining to Military Records, to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), 9700 Page Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63132-5200. This letter serves as notice that I am initiating an action against you which could result in your involuntary separation from the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00249_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00249_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereview becompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00435_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00435_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LASf,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEPERSONALAPP.EARANCE x RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANIZATI0. '1OFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTHERDENY1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER02Aug 2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00638

    Original file (FD-2013-00638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestfortheupgradeofthedischarge,tochangethereasonandauthorityfordischarge,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00177_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00177_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AfSN/SSANALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY ISSUESA94.S3INDEXNUMBERA84.001ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFJCATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEX*+x•+TAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINCDATE CASENUMBER19Jul2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00093

    Original file (FD-2015-00093.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00222_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00222_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at AndrewsAFBon02Jul2013.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistmentcodearedenied.TheBoard...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00665

    Original file (FD-2013-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge tohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...