Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00686
Original file (FD-2013-00686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NA M E OF S ERVICE MEMBER (L AS T , F I RST l\UDDLE I N ITI AL )

GRADE



X        RECORD REVIEW

AFSNISSAN


AODRESS MID OR ORCANlZAT I ON OF COUNSE L


x

MEMBER srIT ING

HON

GEN      UOT H C    OTH ER    DENY
x x x
x
x

A6 7 . 90   r EX H I B        Sl J BMlT I E D TO T H E         'i ' RD
1 ORDER APPO I NT I N G HIE BOARD
2 APPLICATION F OR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 L E TTER OF N O T I F I C" A T I O
4 BR I E F OF PERSO N NEL F I LE
COUNSEL ' S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONA L E XHIBI T S SUBMITTED A T TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARAN CE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANC E HEARIN G

! I F .A R I N G D A T E   CASE NUMBER

1 3 Mar 2014      FD -2 013-00686


Case heard in Was h i ngton, D . C.




Alli FOl\ Ce DISCHAAGER£Vl!W90AllDDEQSIOll"1. MTIONAl..E.
·"


Advi se applicant o f the deci s i on o f the Board , the right to a personal a ppearance with/without c oun se l , and the righ t to submit a n ap pli ca ti o n to the A FB CMR.

N ames and vo te s will be made available to th e appl i cant at the applicant ' s r eq ue st.












SAF/M RBR
550 C STRE ET WES T, SUITE 40
RANDOLP H AFB. TX 78 1 50 -4 742
SEC RE T A R V O F THE AIR l ' ORCE P ERSONNEL C OU N CIL
AIR FORCE D ISCllARC F. R EV I EW 8 0AR l .l 1535 C O L IAND D R . EE W I NC, J RD Fl OOR AN DRE W S A F B . MD 2t7U - 7ttl


AF HQ FORM 0 - 207 7 , JAN 00         (E F -V2)  Pre vio u s




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00686
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for A Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He states he was not given a proper chance to show improvement after spending 30 days in correctional custody. Additionally, he states was unable to reach his assigned counsel and took the General discharge because he had no other choice. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, one Vacation, three Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Admonishment, and two Letters of Counseling. His misconduct included failed to follow lawful order, showed disrespect towards a NCO, acted in an unprofessional manner by failing to control anger, acted in an unprofessional manner and disrespected a NCO, failed to go to duty on time (4x), and failed to brief commander properly on equipment outages and disorderly conduct. After a complete and thorough
review of the applicant's records the Board found his contentions to have no merit. The applicant was sent to correctional custody 1-30 May 2003. Upon return, the applicant received one Article 15, one Vacation and one Letter of Reprimand. Additionally, on 2 September 2003 the applicant acknowledged receipt of his discharge; stated he consulted counsel and waived his right to an administrative discharge board in order to receive a General discharge. The Board opinioned that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.


Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00526_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00526_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCQUNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA94.53INDEXNUMBERA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRlEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGKEARJNGDATE CASENUMBER17Oct2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00805

    Original file (FD-2013-00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEJNlTlAL)PERSONALAPPEARANCE , ... .., NAIEorCOUl'o'.S £ LANOORORGANIV.TIONGRADE AFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEW-'ODRF,SSA,0ORORCANIV.TIONOFCOUl'SELMEMBERSITTINGVOTE01'nn:BOHON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xISSUESA94.53INDEX1'1UM81:R A67.10 EXUIBITSSOBMJ'r'fEDT-0T 1 .RD1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00652

    Original file (FD-2013-00652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00738

    Original file (FD-2013-00738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FlRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)YES NoxGRADE AFSN/SSAN X RECORDREVIEWADOR£SSANDORORGANll.ATIONorCOUNSELVOTEOfTllEBOARDMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTHER DENY1ORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVlEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETI'EROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFlLECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATI01 May2014 CASt:NUMBt.R...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00014

    Original file (FD-2014-00014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOIJNS&LxMEMBERSITTINGVOllON GEN UOTHC DENYx Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) ISSUES A94.SS INDEXNUIBER A67.9-0=-- -r fthUllDDrnrrssiiii/Mliiii"ifi:'.il!ii:iitiliiilf'.'"" Additionallyhestatesthathebelieveshedeservesasecondchancedespitehisdiscrepanciessothathemayserve hiscountryintheUnitesStatesAirForce.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00075

    Original file (FD-2014-00075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,andchangetheauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethe reenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthedischarge,andchangeofauthorityfordischarge,and changeofreenlistmentcodearedenied.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00760

    Original file (FD-2013-00760.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMJDDLKINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEWAFSNISSAN NO (b)(6)ADDRESSANDORORCANl7.ATIONOt · COUNSEi..00MEMBERSITTINGHON GEN UOTHCX*OTHER DENY + X* + X* +X*X* + (XHUUTSSUBMlnEDTOTHEBOARD1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICAT10N4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTlIEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUOMITIEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGII£1\RINCOATE CAS £...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00639_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00639_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequesttochangeofreasonandauthorityfordischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcodeisdenied. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00792

    Original file (FD-2013-00792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMlOOLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANPERSONALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANl7.ATIONOfCOUNSELx MEMBERsrITING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00795

    Original file (FD-2013-00795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVJCEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSAN X RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATION01'COUNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxA94.53A67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER...