Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00460_13
Original file (FD-2013-00460_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DI SCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF S ERV I CE M EMBER (LA S T, FIRST MIDDLE INITIA L )
G RADE


AFSNISSAN


X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR OQCANJ Zl\ TI ON OF COUNSEL



M E MBER SITTING
- ---    -- - .- -- - ·-- --- -
.        .
HON      GEN      UOTHC
- " -·---r ·----

O THE R    DENY

X+* X+*
X+* X+*



ISS UES


A93.23 A92.35 A92.03 A94.55


IN D EX NUMBER


A 6 7 . 3 0
A28.10   1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 AP P LICATION FO R REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTlFICATION
4 BRJEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
X+*

TAPE RECORDING OF P ERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE    CASE NUMBER

1 7 0 ct 2 0 1 3      FD-2 0 1 3 -00460
- -- -- - -       - · -     .        .        - · - -- -- - .....- - - --- - , -- - · - - - · - ;
Case heard in Wa s h i ngto n , D . C.

Advise applicant of the decision of th e Board, the ri ght to a p e rsonal appearance with/without co un se l, and the right to s ubmit an application to the AF B CMR .

N ames and vot es w ill b e mad e available to the applicant at the applicant' s r equest.

+Narrative Reason
*Reenlistment Code





t
TO:
SAF/MRBR
550 C S T REET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB , TX7815-0-4742








.        .        . - - - · - - · - - - --- -- - - - - - - · .
FROM :
SECRETARY OF lllEA I R FO RCE PERSONNEL COUNCI L AIR FORCE DI S CHARG E REVI E W BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE W I NG , J RD Ft. 00 11
ANDREWS AFB,MD 20762-7001


A FHQ FORM 0-207 7, JAN 00         (EF - V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00460
GENERAL:         The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING:         Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for Commission of Serious Offense: Other Serious Offenses and Conditions that Interfere with Military Service: Mental Disorder. Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one time personal hardship in over four and a half years of service with no other adverse action. He also contends his discharge was improper because there was no consideration of the known effects of the prescription medication he was taking, which caused his actions to be notably out of character from his normal behavior. He also admits that he didn't contest the discharge at the time because he was experiencing severe family hardship, was depressed, and felt he was a victim of harassment from his Commander. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and three Letters of Reprimand. His misconduct included
communicating indecent language to a Lieutenant Colonel, drunk and disorderly, physical assault of two Airman, used provoking words towards another airman, resisted arrest from Security Forces, used extremely poor judgment by leaving wingman, and poor fitness scores (3x). The Board took note of the applicant's medical history and while a mental disorder discharge basis exist, AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11, specifically states that a mental disorder discharge is not appropriate as the sole basis of discharge if the airman's record would support discharge for another reason, such as misconduct or unsatisfactory performance. In addition, the Staff Psychiatrist stated, the applicant's ability to function effectively in the military environment is significantly impaired and therefore is not suitable for retention in the Air Force. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant's service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.


Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00521

    Original file (FD-2013-00521.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FlRsrMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUJ\'SELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY ISSUESA93.23INDEXNUMBERA66.00A67.0S1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTiiEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTED ATTlMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBERlOJan2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00645

    Original file (FD-2013-00645.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSI'MIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEPERSONALAPPEARANCEx RECORDREVIEW ADDRESSA. ORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSELMEMBERSITIINGGEN UOTHC OTHERDENYISSUES A94.SS INDEXNUMBERA67.SO •I 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTIIEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVJEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTlFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDmONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£ARJNCDATE CASENUMBER05Feb2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00478_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00478_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADEAFSNfSSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSAHi>ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELISSUESA93.01INDEXNUMBERA67.10HON GEN UOTHC OTHERA93.07 A66.00 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'S RELEASETOTHEBOARDADDmONALEXHIBITSSUBMilTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGllt:ARJNGDATE CASENUMBEROSSep2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00658

    Original file (FD-2013-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA92.21A92.0lINDEXNUMBERA67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUM8ER05Feb2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00042

    Original file (FD-2014-00042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableandtochangethereasonforthedischarge.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeandchangeofreasonaredenied.ISSUE: Theapplicantwasgivenageneraldischargefor misconduct--...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00321_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00321_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY X*x•ISSVESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMBERA67.301ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLJCATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER 19Jttl2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2011-00004

    Original file (FD-2011-00004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY *CHANGE RE CODE SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2011-00004 GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00075

    Original file (FD-2014-00075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,andchangetheauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethe reenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthedischarge,andchangeofauthorityfordischarge,and changeofreenlistmentcodearedenied.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00390

    Original file (FD2005-00390.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD .------------------------------------- (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a HON Disch fr Minot AFB, ND on 23 Mar 05 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.11.9.3 (Adjustment Disorder). Any statements you want the separation authority to consider must reach me by Me, hours, on .

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00023

    Original file (FD-2014-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    S • BR550CSTREETWEST,SUITE40RANDOLPHAFB,TX781504742SECRETARYOfTHEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCILAIRFORCEDlSCHARCERCVIEW80ARI)1535COMMANDOR,£EWINC,JROFLOORANDREWSAFB,MD!07'1-7001AFHQFORM0-2077,JAN00 (EF-V2) Previous AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDDECISIONALRATIONALE CASENUMBER FD-2014-00023GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal...