AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |
CASE NUMBER FD-2013-00308 |
| GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General Discharge for Misconduct: Minor Disciplinary Infractions
The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant's record of service included one Article 15, three Letters of Reprimand and three Letters of Counseling. The misconduct included failure to refrain from allowing an underage person to drink alcohol and failure to remain with base sponsored civilian at all times; failure to report to Hill AFB by Report No Later Than Date (RNLTD) and arrived seven days after RNLTD, with intent to deceive made false statement during interview; departed duty location without authorization and failed to go to duty on time; failed to report for Commander ordered additional duty; lied to an NCO (2x's), and fell asleep while operating a man up forklift during munitions operation.
Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge but did state his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on February 3, 2006) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade. The Board opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged. Attachment: Examiner's Brief |
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00787
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischarge Review .Board(DRB),withcounsel,viavideoteleconferencebetweenJointBaseAndrews Maryland,andJointBaseSanAntonioTexason22Jun2015. Thefollowingwitnessalsotestifiedontheapplicant's behalf: VanessaCamarena.
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD 2013 00189
AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARlNGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FfflSTMlDOLE INITIAL)PERSONAL APPEARANCE COIJNSt:L NAME OFCOUNSELANDOR ORGANIZATION 1 1 YES No xGRAOE AFSN/SSAN RECORDREVIEWADORESSANOORORGANIMTIONOFCOUNSEL VOTE OFTHEROAROMEMBER SITTING HON UOTllCOTHER DENY ISSLESA94.JlINDEX NUMBERA67.10EX1H8ITS SUBMITTEDTO THEBOARDORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETrEROF NOTlrJCATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'S...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00189
AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARlNGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FfflSTMlDOLE INITIAL)PERSONAL APPEARANCE COIJNSt:L NAME OFCOUNSELANDOR ORGANIZATION 1 1 YES No xGRAOE AFSN/SSAN RECORDREVIEWADORESSANOORORGANIMTIONOFCOUNSEL VOTE OFTHEROAROMEMBER SITTING HON UOTllCOTHER DENY ISSLESA94.JlINDEX NUMBERA67.10EX1H8ITS SUBMITTEDTO THEBOARDORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETrEROF NOTlrJCATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'S...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00221_13
AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD ... • ' •• t ,,1,,1:I ' ST,FIRSTllDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANPERSONAL APPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZA110NxADDRESSA. 'IDORORGANIZATIONOFCOllNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSt1ESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMllEllA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00217_13
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00367_13
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANERSONAL APPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELxMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUESA94.53INDEXNUMBERA67.031ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITTONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER19Jul2013...
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00235
GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE:The applicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00121
GENERAL:Theapplicant appealstochangethereasonand authorityforthe discharge. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel, at AndrewsAFBon11June2015.Apersonalstatementandarevisedpersonal statementweresubmittedat thehearing.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingto thedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddenies thechangeofreasonandauthorityfor dischargeandchangeof reenlistment code.TheBoard findstheapplicant...
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00006
GENERAL:Theapplicant appealsforupgrade ofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. ...
AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00201_13
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRST MIDDLE L'IJITIAL) GRADEAFSNISSAN x PERSONALAPPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OFCOUNSELAND ORORGANIZATION(b) (6)ADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL(b) (6)MEMBERSITTINGHON GEN UOTHCxOTHER DENY ISSUESA92.21A94.55INDEX NUMBERA60.00ORDERAPPOINTING THEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEW OFDISCHARGELEITEROFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITS SUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPE...