Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00217_13
Original file (FD-2013-00217_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMB E R ( LAST,FlRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

G RADE


PERSONAL APPEARANCE


Paralyzed Veterans of America
x        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSE L

1 201 Broad Rock Blvd Richmond VA 2 3 249



MEMBER SITTING

H ON      GEN

UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
x x x
x
x


A67.90

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2       
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3       
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL' SRELEASE TOTHE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


H£AIUNG DATE     CASE NUMBER

19 Jul2013      FD-2013-00217

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant' s request.











TO:


SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742


SECRETARY Of THE AIR fOllCE PEltSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISC11ARGE REVIEW BOARD
(5)5 COMMAND DR,EE WING,JRD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB,MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00217
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a UOTHC for a Pattern of Misconduct: Misconduct: Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Vacation action, and a Special Court Martial. His misconduct included wrongful use of government travel card on multiple occasions, with intent to deceive made false official statement to a Non-Commissioned Officer, wrongful use of marijuana on multiple occasions, with intent to defraud wrote bad checks in the amount of $2,500.00, and failure to pay just debt. The applicant did consult with the Area Defense Counsel and did not submit any statements concerning his discharge. He also waived his right to present his case before an administrative discharge board and signed an unconditional wavier with the understanding that the separation authority will determine the type of discharge that will be issued to him. He further stated that he understood that he may be deprived of veteran's benefits and was aware of the adverse nature of such a discharge and the possible consequences thereof. The applicant has repeatedly engaged in acts of misconduct that exemplify a blatant disregard for standards of acceptable conduct. The applicant's failure to conform to established behavioral expectations and Air Force standards clearly demonstrates his lack of integrity and his inability to adhere to Air Force standards. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.




Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00217

    Original file (FD2008-00217.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN AMN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW : | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x Xx x x ISSUES A92.35 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 - ATUBTES SUB : 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00378_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00378_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbythe applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00409_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00409_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforAPatternofMisconduct-ConductPrejudicial toGood...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00594_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00594_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOA.RDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FlRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNJSSANxADDRESSANDORORGANIZ.ATIOi'IOFCOUNS!LMEMBERSITTINGUOTHCOTHERDENY1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOF PERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARING DATE CASENUMBER03Oct2013 FD-2013-00594.-----------.- - ---- -·-- - ------- --- - ·- -- -------...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00212_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00212_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDLAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE ..- PERSONALAPPEARANCE---- x RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDOR ORCANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSIITINGGENUOTHC OTHER DENY 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPFARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAIUNCDATE CASE l\1JMll £ R19Jul2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00358_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00358_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthedischarge. ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforCommission...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00342_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00342_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.The Board findsthat neither the evidence ofrecord nor that provided bythe applicant substantiates aninequityorimproprietythatwould...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00498

    Original file (FD-2013-00498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAME OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSAN x PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY A92.21•vv.001 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE 3 LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCE TAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00665

    Original file (FD-2013-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge tohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00616_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00616_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change...