Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00261_13
Original file (FD-2013-00261_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)      GRADE



X        RECORD REVIEW

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON      GEN      UOTHC

OTHER

DENY
x x x x
x


A67.10

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OFPERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITSSUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


Hl!AIUNG DATE   CASE NVMBER

02 Aug 2013      FD-2013-00261


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board,the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant' s request.











SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781504742

SECRETARY OFTHEAIRFORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL Al.R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR.EE WING, JRDFLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD l0761-7t01


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00261

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He states he did not drink and that his coke was spiked. The records indicated the applicant received one Article 15, one Letter of Reprimand, one Letter of Admonishment and one Letter of Counseling. His misconduct included failed to report to sick call, failed to report on time for formation, unauthorized cell phone during duty day, late for class on several occasions, smoking in Marine smoke pit, reported to sick call late, failed to turn in homework, underage consumption, and driving while intoxicated. After a complete and thorough review of the records, the Board found the applicant's contention to have no merit. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant's service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air
Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00747

    Original file (FD-2013-00747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUESA94.53INDEXNUMBERA67.10A66.001ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFJCATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHf.ARINGDATE CASENUMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00451_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00451_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: Therequestfortheupgradeofthedischarge,tochangeofreasonandauthorityfordischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcodeisdenied. HebelievesheshouldhavemetaMedicalEvaluationBoard(MEB) priortobeingdischarged.TherecordsindicatedtheapplicantreceivedtwoArticle 15s,oneVacation,sevenLettersofReprimand,oneLetterof Counseling,andoneRecordofIndividualCounseling. Afteracompleteandthoroughreviewoftheapplicant'srecordsandtheevidencesubmittedbythe applicant,theBoardfoundtheapplicant'scontentiontohavenomerit.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00361_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00361_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST, Fl.RSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSAN X RECORD REVIEWADDRESS ANI> ORORGANJ2.ATION or COUNSEL A67.10A86.00HON GEN UOTHC 1ORDER APPOINTING1HEBOARDOTHER DENY 2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARJNGHEARING DATE CASE NUMBER02Aug2013 FD-2013-00361...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00374_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00374_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDBEARINGRECORDGRADEX RECORDREVIEADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELISSUESA67.10HON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY A94.551ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD 2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER19Jul2013 FD-2013-00374CaseheardinWashington,D.C.AdviseapplicantofthedecisionoftheBoard,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00036

    Original file (FD-2010-00036.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE TYPE GEN | | x | RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING GEN x Xx x x Xx ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 es ] |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00347_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00347_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Applicant receivedaGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseApplicant contendsdischargewasinequitablebecauseitwasbased...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00378_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00378_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbythe applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00314

    Original file (FD-2013-00314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestfortheupgradeof thedischarge,tochangethereasonand...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00261

    Original file (FD2006-00261.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct--Drug Abuse Issue 1: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00011

    Original file (FD-2014-00011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgrade ofdischarge tohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.