Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00498
Original file (FD-2012-00498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)      GRADE

AFSN/SSAN



TYPE GEN
I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE
x        I        RECORD REVIEW

: :;,:·,' .i{-r NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
YES      No
x
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL



,·        .·.

HON      GEN


UOTHC    OTHER    DENY

x

x










A93.01 A92.01 A94.05







'.90
x x x
..·' . ' .Ex:tHBrrsSuBMffl'El> TO THEBOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE    CASE NUMBER

05 Feb 2014      FD-2012-00498


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.













TO:




SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
fijN'fv ' J( • , ' ··
FROM:





SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER


FD-2012-00498

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE:   Applicant received a General discharge for A pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The records indicated the applicant was convicted under a General court-martial, received one Article 15, two Letters of Reprimand, three Letters of Counseling, and one Record of Individual Counseling. His misconduct included disrespect to an AF member who was in a position of authority, failed to go to duty on time (2x), failed to properly complete thru-flight inspection, failed to accomplish assigned duties, failed to compete task on three separate occasions, violated military protection order (2x), willful damage to military property, destroyed cell phone belonging to SrA, destroyed dress and purse belonging to SrA, stole digital video disc belonging to A 1C, assaulted female airman, caused broken glass to strike a SrA, unlawfully placed hands on SrA, drunk and disorderly, unlawfully entered female airman dorm room and unlawfully entered male airman dorm room.
The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

Applicant contends that he should not be penalized indefinitely for mistakes he made when he was young. The DRB recognized the applicant was 22 years of age when the discharge took place. However, there is no evidence he was immature or did not know right from wrong. The Board opined the applicant was older than the vast majority of first-term members who properly adhere to the Air Force's standards of conduct.
The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant's discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well, has a good job, and attending college However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided ful administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00682

    Original file (FD-2013-00682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,RRST l\UDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSAN X RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANIZATION01'COUl'ISEL xMEMBER SITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUllS INDEX NUMB&RA92.21A94.SSA67.10ORDER APPOINTINGTHE BOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOf DISCHAR GE3 LITTEROFNOTIFICATION 4 BRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL"S RELEASETOnlEBOARD ADDITIONALEXlilBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDING 01'PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGlt &ARINCDAT! ;;...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00170

    Original file (FD2006-00170.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was found guilty by the Summary Court Martial for unlawfully striking another airman with a wooden stick and unlawfully entering the dorm room of an airman. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief ....................................... DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH SRA) 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00249

    Original file (FD2006-00249.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I feel that there was complete injustice done by my commander(s) .

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00338_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00338_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEAFSN/SSANADDRESS ANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOVNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHERxxA67.90 A93.07 lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPFARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGl:f.EARJNGDATE CASENVMBER19Juf2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00468_13

    Original file (FD-2010-00468_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL HON GEN UOTHC OTHER xxA94.0SA67.10A66.00ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETTEROF NOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGBEARJNGDATI: CASENUMBER OSSep2013FD-2010-00468CaseheardinWashington,D.C.Advise applicantofthe decisionoftheBoard,the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00317

    Original file (FD-2010-00317.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW . The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. Although the Board did not condone the applicant’s misconduct, they found that based on his entire record and personal circumstances at the time of discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00426

    Original file (FD-2010-00426.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW f NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY F x x x x | x ISSUES A94.11 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 —— ae , A01.53 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00098

    Original file (FD-2015-00098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE:TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforUnsatisfactoryPerformanceThe AirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underits...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00214

    Original file (FD-2010-00214.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW — NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING | i | } j : Pod df i of | ee ee ee i i po} bop dt gt x Po fg po oF YE i i i i i a Po] po ob | x Poof fF oF oF | Pog og poof x i i i i i i ee i pooE GY Popo Gd dy A94.53 pwn h 7.90 1 j|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF...