AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW
— NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
| i | } j :
Pod df i of |
ee ee ee
i i
po} bop dt gt x
Po fg po oF YE
i i i i i
a Po] po ob | x
Poof fF oF oF |
Pog og poof x
i i i i i
i ee
i pooE GY
Popo Gd dy
A94.53 pwn h 7.90
1 j|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
22 Jun 2012 FD-2010-00214
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the avplicant’s request.
i
i
ARE me tt a
CmeSconnctnantane emma
a ennai
mae RA ACA SAREE ONO ORAM» OP ew: rene Poam
i
}
|
|
|
:
ROMS MY seen tn tk
:
i
'
i
t
i
|
|
fearon iaansnehment srs manvennpenenmaura
| i i i i j x ree
; i i i j : i
| j a | i f ao4
é i i } :
poof Fe EG pod
Pip df i |
i i 5 i covupeae — |
a } i ; : j ‘i IR em era
SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
Previous
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2)
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00214
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for a Pattern of Misconduct — Conduct Prejudicial to Good
Order and Discipline
Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The record indicates
the applicant received one Article 15, one Vacation, two Letters of Reprimand, and one Record of Individual
Counseling. His misconduct included underage drinking (2x), having females in his dorm room, tampered
with a smoke detector, violated curfew, failed to report on time to place of duty, driving while intoxicated,
failed to obey order to go to physical fitness, and failed to report to duty on three separate occasions. The
Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his
behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's
duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity
to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00294
IAW AFI 36-3213, the applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), however failed to make a timely response to the Board’s notification of a scheduled hearing. FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change the reenlistment code are denied. ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct — Minor Disciplinary Infractions Applicant submitted no issues regarding the...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00057
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change the reenlistment code are denied. ISSUE: Applicant received a General...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00795
AIRFORCE DISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVJCEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSAN X RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATION01'COUNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxA94.53A67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00432
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct — Drug Abuse The applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh.
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00293
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN [|X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY t i i i { i Poi ot bd Ed dg x Pe bE | i A é 4 5 i : ; * byork dG bg - i \ { j i i i } PoE : : i : i : ; X*+ pod EE GE pot | Po rtf EG] x Pope i | é j j ee ee | hoe clonane A92.35 A67.10 ae cur sence A93.01 1 |ORDER...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00394
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board found the no impropriety to warrant upgrade of the discharge and opined the characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Issue #3 - Applicant contends her discharge was inequitable because the other individual was discharged under the force shaping program...
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00656
AJR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)(b)(6)GRADF.TYPE I PERSONAL APPEARANCEx I RECORD REVIEW CONSELNAME or COUr\Stl.ANOORORGANl7,ATIONADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEi.YESNoxMEMBERSITTINGVOTEOFTHE BOARDHONGE\.IUOTHC'OTHERDENY(b)(6)xxxxxISSUES A94.53 INDEXNUMBER A66.001'XHJB11SSUBMlTTEOTO THEBOARD1ORDERAPPOfNTINGTllEBOARD2APPLICATION FOR REVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4BRIEF OFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDlrlONAL...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2011-00004
+ CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY *CHANGE RE CODE SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2011-00004 GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00262
i | Poof GEE J x i ee ee poo oG oF bE dG | i oy | | i of 4 | i ; ; i i ee ee | i 4 “ ee | HE | Poy od | rf - Po bod ot dg | ISSUES ‘493.19 INDEX NUMBER rn 67.10 oe a a is f A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.01 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 29 Mar 2012...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00292
& Z z ; X+ pop op ot | ; | | gd PoP oy op | X + ee ee ee Pop Foe f fo fof | ; INDER Rew A110 Be GEES UR EEE EO TEE BOARD 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 26 Jun 2012 FD-2010-00292 Case heard in Washington, D.C. The Board opined that the LOC...