Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00656
Original file (FD-2014-00656.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AJR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE IN ITIAL)
(b)(6)
GRA DF.
TYPE I       PERSON AL APPEARANC E I        RECORD REVIEW
CO NSEL NAME or COUr\Stl. ANO OR ORGANl7,ATI ON ADDRESS AND ORORGANIZATION OFCOUNSEi.
YES No
x

MEMBER SITTING
VOTE OF THE BOARD
HON GE\.I UOTHC' OTHER DENY
(b)(6) x
x
x
x
x
ISS UES  A94.53 INDEX NUMBER
A66.00
1'XHJB11SSUBMlTTEOTO THE BOARD
1 ORDER APPOfNTING TllE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REV I EW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDlrlONAL EXH IBITS SUBl\llnED A"I rJME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE MEARING
HEARING DATE

21 Apr 2015
(ASEr\UMBER

FD-2014-00656
APPLICANT'S ISSUE ANOTHEDOARO'S D£CJSIONAl.RATIONALS ARE OISCVSSED 01< TH£ ATTACHED AIR FORCE OLSCllAR.GllREVIEW BOARD OCCJSIONAl. RATIO-:ALS.
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.








(b)(6)
INOORSEMENT        DATE: 4/2712015


SAF/MRDR
550 C STREET WEST. SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB. TX 78150-4742
FROI :
SECRETARY OF HIEAIR FORCE PERSONN EL COUNCIL AI R FORCE DISOIARGE REVI EW BOARD
1;. ;CO.\lIAND DR. EE \\1NG.3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB. MD 20762-700 I
AFHQ FORVI 0-2077, JAJ. 00      (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00656

GENERAL : The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Drug Abuse

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included one Article 15 and one Letter of Reprimand for failing to attend base detail as instructed by the First Sergeant and failing to at time prescribed to appointed place of duty four times.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does state that he never used drugs and his admittance of marijuana use was a lie; he used it as an excuse at the
not for not reporting to duty. The ORB found no evidence in applicant 's records that he ever submitted statements on his behalf stating the statement he made was false; despite the fact that it was used as the basis for his involuntary discharge where he was notified of this on the Discharge Notification Memorandum
dated December 5, 2007. The Board opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner' s Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00657

    Original file (FD-2014-00657.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge Review Board (ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeTheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbytheapplicantsubstantiatesan...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00633

    Original file (FD-2014-00633.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00639

    Original file (FD-2014-00639.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforadischargeupgradetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00731

    Original file (FD-2014-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERA L: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00335

    Original file (FD-2014-00335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00726

    Original file (FD-2014-00726.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReview Board (ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00681

    Original file (FD-2013-00681.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNA\1EOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORD REVIEWl-COllNSEl --1NJ\1EOf COUNSEL J\'OORORGAi'il7..AHOXYES No xMEMBERSITTINGADDRESS MW ORORGMill'.J\TIONOfCOUNSELVOTE OFTHE BOARD HON GEN UOTI-IC OTHER A67.90 EXHIBITSSUBMITTEDTOTH.EBOARD IORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOF DISCHARGE3 LErfEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEF OFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXH1131TSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00759

    Original file (FD-2014-00759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)but declinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theappl icantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE: Theappl icantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct- DrugAbuseTheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibili...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00782

    Original file (FD-2014-00782.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00477

    Original file (FD-2014-00477.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethe reenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. inviewoftheforegoing find ings:theBoardconcludesthatapplicanf sreenlistmentcodeis moreaccuratelyreflectedas 3Kandshouldbe changedunderthe provisionsof TitleI 0,USC1553.