AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
ae \ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL |
- _. MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
x
x
x
x
ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER A67.05
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
de | G2 | pe
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
16 Jun 2011
FD-2009-00694
BON
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp _5999-00694
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct—A pattern of Misconduct: Discreditable
Involvement with Military of Civil Authorities
Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does
submit that he understands the issues regarding his discharge and has taken to appropriate actions to ensure
he does not make the same mistakes again. The record indicates the applicant received one Article 15, and
one Vacation. His misconduct included disobeyed an order regarding installation curfew, failure to provide
information upon request to a security forces patrolman, resisted being apprehended by a security forces
patrolman, and driving under the influence. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the
applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful
misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire
record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted
that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on
September 7, 2005) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational
entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the
applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
ive ce & oa nese 8 "APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
4 Poo, FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES"
Pee? (Please teed inshructions on Pages 3 and «BEFORE completing this apphcatoh,)
r Ornaio es average 4 response, TOMIEWANG Ins chon: =, a
STS SSE RET SRT SR SR po GS AE ST
Srl tr nator Ss nr baton Soe Sve tres GOL) Merri ses mete ar ya a no
Se ne A a. fe eee ae a cease nen tone valid OMB control number. SLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FOR
THE: FORM TO THE
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
| AUTHORITY: 10 U.S.C. 1553; £.0. 9397.
- E PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): To apply for a change in the charactetization or reason for military discharge issued to an individual.
ROUTINE USE(S): None.
= } DISCLOSURE: Voluntary, however, faltwwe to provide iienilying infomation may impede processing of iis application. The request for Social
IS DATE OF DISCHARGE OR SEPARATION] 4 DISCHARGE CHARACTERIZATION RECEIVED (AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00091
Attachment: Examiner's Brief 7 DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD VOTING CARD COUNSEL NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE AND AUTH FOR DISCHARGE (Reason) AFI 36-3208, Para 5.50.1 (Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil Authority) DD FORM 149 TOTAL ACTIVE SERVICE (Yrs - Months - Day) l ~ r l o m o s l 8 d a s Refer to SAFlMRBR DATE APPLICANT SUBMIITED 27 Feb 2003 DATE OF SEPARATION 2 4 ~ ~ 2 0 0 1 DATE RETURNED ,- 10: - INDEX: HEARING DATE 14 Nov 2003 REMARKS DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 03 Mar 2003 DATE...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00083
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) .------------------------------ .------------------------------ (PE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION I GRADE AMN I RECORDREVIEW X I I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSNISSAN ---------------- r.-..-....-..-.J MEMBER SITTING 1 HON I GEN I UOTHC I OTHER I DENY SUES A95.00 1 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 I 1 1 2 3 4 I I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I I ORDER...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00040_Redacted
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X i RECORD REVIEW <4 NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL TYPE GEN HON GEN UVOTHC OTHER DENY x+* XH ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94,11 A92.21 A64.00 ie ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION wt _ >» BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD : [ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0007
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN AIC Gainiet RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE.GF THE BOARD o HON GEN UOTHC — OTHER DENY X X X X Xx ISSUES INDEX NUMBER og EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD: A47.00, A94.05 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 2 JUN 03 FD2002-0007 COUNSEL’S...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00298
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recfd a GEN Disch fr USAF Dyess AFB, TX on 30 Jun 06 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.1 (Pattern of Misconduct - Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil Authorities). The LOR was placed in your cxisting , TJIF and ydu were placed an the Control Roster, as cvidmced by AF Form 1058, dated 23 Mar 06. were d, You did, an 19 Mar 06, fail to obey a lawhl gmernl regulation...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00687
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW a B NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN voTHc | OTHER DENY X+ X+ X+ X+ X+ ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER A67.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00148
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00148 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for A Pattern of Misconduct - Discreditable Involvement With Military or Civil Authorities. The authority for this action is AFI 36-3208, dated 14 Oct 94, paragraph 5.50.1.
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00123_Redacted
Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE OMB No. For this misconduct he was counseled, as evidenced by LOC, dated 23 Oct 01. c. He did, on 29 Jan 02, without authority, report 55 minutes late for duty, for which he -was reprimanded, as evidenced by LOR, dated 1 Feb 01. d. He did, on 11 Jul 02, without authority, report approximately 4 hours late for duty, for which he received...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-00536
$50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL zt a a ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING RD PRESIDENT oy SECRETARY OF THE AIR...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00236
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN _ AB sh. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2003-00236 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Issue 2: I please ask the board to consider my request, so that, I may have my discharge upgraded to honorable.