AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

    
     
  
 

AFSN/SSAN

 

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE | X | RECORD REVIE'

|| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

ox

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

ISSUES ‘A92.21 INDEX NUMBER A67.10

 

 

 

Blwlr [ep

 

 

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

14 Oct 2010 FD-2009-00118

 

 

 

 
 
 

    

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 
 

“INDORSEMENT:<

     

FROM:

SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp_5999-00118

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of

discharge)
ISSUE:

Issue 1. The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job. However, no
inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The DRB
recognized the applicant was 22 years of age when the discharge took place. However, there is no evidence
he was immature or did not know right from wrong. The Board opined the applicant was the same age or
older than the vast majority of first-term members who properly adhere to the Air Force’s standards of
conduct. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to

the misconduct.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE OMB No. 0704-0004

FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OMB approval expires
ificere read instructions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) Oct 31, 2009

e reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Oepartment of Deferise, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0004). Respondents should be sware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does net display a currently valid OMB control number, PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM
TO THE ABOVE ORGA NIZA TION. RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON BACK OF THIS PAGE.

PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
AUTHORITY: 10 U.S.C. 1553; E.0. 9397. :
PRINCIPAL PURPOSE(S): To apply for a change in the characterization or reason for military discharge issued to an individual.

ROUTINE USE(S): None. /
DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure to provide identifying information may impede processing of this application. The request for Social

Security Number is strictly to assure proper identification of the individual and appropriate records.
1. APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed). PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.

 

 

“ (YYYYMMDD) (if date is more than 15 years
ago, submit a DD Form 149)

 

 

 

 

 

6. ISSUES: WHY AN UPGRADE OR CHANGE IS REQUESTED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUEST (Continue in Item 43. See instructions: y

_ Fae 3) DPR SED PER FeRmeN CS. VANES Oc
Eure’ Oe eRe THERE 2 BESS VEZ ERS TERED AND |

OF at SNE AED | Wout aan feeswond We

7. if ap ppieatle) ‘AK APPLICA 1ON WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON (VYYYMMDD) ;
AND THIS FORM IS SUBMITTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL: ISSUES, JUSTIFICATION, OR EVIDENCE:

8. IN SUPPORT OF THis APPLICATION, THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE: (Continue in Hem 14.
if military documents or medical records are relevant to your case, please send copies.)

 

9. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED (X one)

CONDUCT A RECORD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONNEL FILE AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION __
X| SUBMITTED BY ME. | AND/OR (counsel/representative) WILL NOT APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD.

| ANO/OR (counsefrepresentative) WISH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE BOARD IN THE

WASHINGTON, D.C. METROPOLITAN AREA.

T AND/OR (counselrepresentative) WISH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE A TRAVELING PANEL CLOSEST TO
(enter city and state} (NOTE: The Navy Discharge Review Board does not hi have a traveling panei.)

 

(Last, First, Middle Initial) B
(See Item 10 of the instructions about counsel/representative.)

 

 

11, APPLICANT MUST SIGN IN ITEM 12.a. BELOW. If the record In question is that of a decaased or incompetent person, LEGAL PROOF

OF DEATH OR INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. If the application is signed by other than the applicant,
Indicate the name (print and relationship by marking a box below.

NEXT OF KIN LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE | | OTHER (Specify)
CASE NUMBER

12. CERTIFICATION. | make the foregoing statements, as part of my claim, with full knowledge of the CO
penalties involved for willfully making a faise statement or claim. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Sections 287 (Da not write in this space.)

and 1001, provide that an individual shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.)
b. DATE SIGNED - REQUIRED
505 OF. Ep g00%-ooi’
200% OZ JO

US EDITION IS OBSOLETE. , Page 1 of 4 Pages
13. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 6, ISSUES (/f applicable)

     

 

       

14, CONTINUATION OF ITEM 8, SUPPORTING DOCUMEN applicable)

16. REMARKS (if applicable) —
Since my discharge DT have hele Mane oer positions at
Ver y well Known retailers. £ alse bqave haa «. Kih which has made

re much more respons: ble. Lam carrendly a tend ing college rn
pursart of o Rachelers hegree SO F can provide ee better MWe

Cor ray SON. A pen Completion of my schoo] ins I woul like to

ub fein a respectable “yok ana L ole not wan + hy past ya
Me heck, Please ba Ke into consideration that T have learns em

my mistakes fn the past and wigh te move On and leqol a suceesta|
like with nry cow, JT have atlache cf four character ledters from
Co-workers, ertencls ant Comily

MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.

 

ARMY NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

Army Review Boards Agency Naval Council of Personnel Boards "
Support Division, St. Louis 720 Kennon Street, S.E.

9700 Page Avenue Room 309 (NDRB)

St. Louis, MO 63132-5200 Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5023

(See hitp://arba.army.pentagon.mil)

 

 

AIR FORCE “QAST GUARD

Air Force Review Boards Agency U.S. Coast Guard
SAF/MRBR Commandant (CG-122)}
550-C Street West, Suite 40 2100 Second Street, S.W. Room 5500

Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4742 Washington, DC 20593

   

DD FORM 293, NOV 2006__.____...... Ragen cia pases
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

AFDRB BRIEF
" DOCKET # COMPONENT:
po FD-2009-00118 USAF

TYPE OF DISCHARGE: | DISCHARGE FROM: | DISCHARGE DATE: APPEALS FOR: HON DISCH
GENERAL EGLIN AFB, FL 27 DEC 04

 

DOB/ ENLMT AGE: DISCH AGE: FORMER: | HGH: — .| B. CURRENT DOR: C. TIME LOST:
4 AUG 82 18 8/12 | 22 4/12 AMN A1C 4 MAR 03 NONE

 

AFSC: 2A353A — TAC ACFT MAIINT F-15 DEP DT: ASVAB SCORES:
(JORNEYMAN) , 3 MAY 01 A: 63 E: 67 G: 66 M: 70

 

D. ART 15: D. LOR, LOA, RIC, LOC: E. SPCM/ GCM: ADDITIONAL: (IE. CIVIL CONV, CDC)
ART 15: 2 LOR: 2 NONE NONE

 

—t

F. RECORD OF SERVICE (EPR/ OPR, PAST TO PRESENT) :

14 AUG 01-13 APR 03 EGLIN 2 (INITIAL) REFERRAL
14 APR 03-13 APR 04 EGLIN 3 (ANNUAL) REFERRAL

 

G. AWARDS & DECS: NDSM, AFTR

 

EAD: 14 AUG 01 DAS: 19 MAY 02 H. TMS: TAMS:
3YRS 7MOS 24DAS 3YRS 4MOS 3DAS

 

APPLN (DD FORM 293) DTD: DT/ INITIALS: NPA: YES PA: NO
18 FEB 09 2 SEP 09/VML

RECORDS: | WPR ARMS: X | STR: X | ISSUES: YES | ATTACHMENTS: YES

AUTH FOR DISCHARGE :
AFI 36-3208 PARA 5.49 - (MISCONDUCT: MINOR DISCIPLINARY INFRACTIONS)

ART 15; SPCM; GCM; ADDITIONAL:

 

 

LOR: 13 FEB 03 - ALLOWED FELLOW AMN TO DRIVE WHILE INTOXICATED.
(1) ART15: 4 MAR 03 ~ (ART 108) BROKE WINDOW IN DORMITORY.

(2) ART15: 4 AUG 04 -—(ART 92) PROVIDED ALCOHOL TO A MINOR (AMN).
(ART 111) PHYSICALY CONTROLLED A VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED.

LOR: 1 SEP 04 — (2 APR 09) FLED AND ELUDED THE CQ & SF.
(2 AUG 09) DESTROYED PERSONAL PROPERTY, UNAUTHORIZED FEMALE IN DORM &

CHARGED WITH ASSAULT.

 

EXAMINER'S NOTE:
APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE OMB No. 0704-0004

FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OMB approval expires
pao read instructions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) Oct 34, 2009

1) minutes per response, including the lime fo Teviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathenng and
maintairing the data needed, ud completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate. or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0004). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shai! be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if t does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM
TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION. RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS ON BACK OF THIS PAGE.

PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
AUTHORITY: 10 U.S.C. 1553; E.0. 9397.
PRINCIPAL PURPOSE{S): To apply for a change in the characterization or reason for military discharge issued to an individual.

ROUTINE USE(S): None.
DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure to provide identifying information may impede processing of this application. The request for Social

Security Number is strictly to assure proper identification of the individual and appropriate records.

1. APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is fo be reviewed). PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.

c. GRADEIRANK AT Dig
ee

‘(TYYYMMDD) (if date is more than 15 years

age, submit # OD Form 449) CHANGE TO GENERALIUNDER

HONORABLE CONOMORS.

 

 

SEPARATION:.

6. ISSUES: WHY AN UPGRADE OR CHANGE [S REQUESTED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUEST (Continue in Item 13. Te ace.

: Page 3} BASES PEA FeSfb Fee AAS S. ANDO. CUSAN Fe
o\ curse OieiRece AD

THERES wee.
oP Me SERULS AND Lad pn (2 c000 TS

7. (0 if applicable) At APPLICA ION WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON MMDD) .
AND THIS FORM IS SUBMITTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL ISSUES, JUSTIFICATION, OR EVIDENCE:

8. IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION, THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE: {Continue in tem ia.
if military documents or medical records are relevant to your case, please send copies.)

9. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED (X one}
CONDUCT A RECORD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONNEL FILE AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
x SUBMITTED BY ME. | AND/OR (counsel/representative) WILL NOT APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD.
} AND/OR (counsel/representative) WISH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE BOARD IN THE
WASHINGTON, D.C. METROPOLITAN AREA.

 

 

 

EAND/OR {counsel/representainve) WISH TO APPEAR AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE A TRAVELING PANEL CLOSEST TO
(enter city and ote) (NOTE: The Navy Discharge Review Board does not have a traveling panel.)

IVE (if any) NA (Last, First, Middle Initial) AND A
{See item 10 of the instructions about counsel/representative.}

 

11. APPLICANT MUST SIGN IN ITEM 12.a. BELOW. If the record in question is that of a deceased or incompetent person, LEGAL PROOF

OF DEATH OR INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. If the application Is signed by other than the applicant,
Indicate the name (print) and relationship by marking a box below.

CASE NUMBER

. . ts, f i ith full k edge of the a te bbe .
12. CERTIFICATION. | make the foregoing statements, as part of my claim, with full knowledge f (Do not write in this space.)

penalties involved for willfully making a false statement or claim. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Sections 287
and 1001, provide that an individual shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.)

b. DATE SIGNED - REQUIRED

(YYYYMMDD) Fp 00" OO WE

200% OZ [P

Page 1 of 4 Pages
13. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 6, ISSUES (/f applicable)

 

 

      

15. REMARKS (iFapplicable) , .

Since my discharge ZE have hele! wan ee positions “F
Very well Known retailers. False have haa « Kick which has made
pre vwucth prore responsible | L am carcendly attending college rn
pursurt of oO Bachelors hegree SO £ can provike ce Ketter Wle
Cor my 80n. per comoaletion of ny schoo] ing L woul IiKe to

ublein a respectable “yo and L dlp not want hy past holol ing
Me heck Please dake wWro consideration that T have loupe bron

my mistakes rn the past Qnd wish te meve On and legal a succestul
life with nxy GOWN. T have attache Af four character letters from
Co-workers, ertencls ancl Comily

MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.

ARMY NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. Louis

9700 Page Avenue

St. Louis, MO 63132-5200

(See http//arba.army.pentagon.mil)

Naval Council of Personnel Boards

720 Kennon Street, S.E.

Room 309 (NDRB)

Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5023

AIR FORCE SOAST GUARD

Air Force Review Boards Agency U.S. Coast Guard
SAF/MRBR Commandant (CG-122)

550-C Street West, Suite 40 2100 Second Street, S.W. Room 5506
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4742 Washington, DC 20593

   

. DD FORM 293, NOV 2006. Page 2 of 4 Pages
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

33 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SQUADRON (ACC)
EGLIN AFB FLORIDA 32542

FROM: 33 AMXS/CC

 

-SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

!. lam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, -
specifically minor disciplinary infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and
AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be
characterized as honorable or general. 1 am recommending that your service be characterized as
general.

2. My reasons for this action are:

a. Investigation has disclosed that on or about 2 August 2004 at Dormitory 17D, you were
involved in an incident where Security Forces personnel responded to a report of violence
within your room. During that investigation it was determined that there was destruction of ~
personal property. Additionally, you had an unauthorized female guest in your dormitory
room and were charged with assault. In a separate dormitory incident on or about 2 April
2004, you were charged with fleeing and eluding the CQ and Security Forces, hiding
personnel in your latrine, assisting them in eluding apprehension, and failing to obey the
CQ. For this offense you received a letter of reprimand, dated 1 September 2004.

_ b.. You, who knew of your duties at or near Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 2 April

2004, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain
from providing alcohol to Airman First a... was under the age of
twenty-one, as it was your duty to do. .

You did, at or near Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 23 May 2004, near the entry
control point of the East Gate physically control a. vehicle, to wit: a passenger car, while the
.alcohol concentration in your breath was 0.160 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath or

greater as shown by chemical analysis. For these offenses you received nonjudicial
punishment, dated 4 August 2004.

c. You did, at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 15 February 2003, without proper |
authority, willfully break a window in dormitory 17, military property of the United States,
by hitting it with your hand, the amount of said damage being in the sum of about $49.59.
For this offense you received nonjudicial punishment, dated 4 March 2003.

d. Investigation has. disclosed that on or abo foam! in a social
gathering in your room in Dorm #17 wit During
this party, the other individuals were drinking bo er and “Jaegermeister” shots. They

both made sworn written affidavits that implicated you in the crime of underage drinking.

~“
However, in your sworn written statement, you vehemently denied consuming any alcohol
(this could never be verified because you could NOT be located that night/you never

returned tg your room and no BAT was taken). At approximately 2245 hours, 11 January
2003, yo OV and drove to the West at =

to get some “Black & Milds.” By your own sworn admission, you related that as SO
intoxicated he could, “hardly see, much less drive.” However, you (the ONLY person who
was allegedly | drinking that night) allow get behind the wheel of his car
while you ~~ ae got inside as pas . For this offense you received a letter
of reprimand, dated 13 February 2003.

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher authority
will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the United States Air Force and, if you
are discharged, how your service wil! be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible

for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be
subject to recoupment.

4, You have the right to consult counsel: Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
] have made an appointment for you to consult a 0: N. 2nd Street, on
I December 2004 at 1300 hours. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me within 3 duty days unless you request and receive
an extension for good cause shown. J will send them to the separation authority.

. 6. Ifyou fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. | :

. 7. You have been scheduled for an appointment with the 96th Mission Support Squadron,
separations section, on 1 December 2004 at 1030 hours.

1930
8. After your briefing, you are to report to the 96th Traffic Management Office with your
authorized letter from separations to schedule your TMO pickup.

9. You are required to receive a briefing from the Family Support Center prior to your

separation. You have been scheduled to receive your Transition Assistance Management Program -

(TAMP) briefing on 7 December 2004 at 0800 hours.

10. You have been scheduled for a medica! examination. You must report to 96 MDG Force
Health Management, 307 Boatner Rd. on 9 December 2004, at 0715 hours for the examination.

11. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at 33 AMX/CSS.
oo é

12. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

 

Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents
2. Receipt of Notification Memorandum
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 96™ AIR BASE WING (AFMC)
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

 

_ MEMORANDUM FOR 96 ABW/CC DEC 16 2004

FROM: 96 ABW/JA

SUBJECT: Legal Review, AFI 36-3208 Administrative Dischrae l
TE CC

1 LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: I reviewed the attached discharge package concerning
and find it legally sufficient to support an administrative discharge action for’

misconduct, specifically minor disciplinary infractions under AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49.

  
 
  
  
 

2. INITIATION OF ACTION: On | December 2004 33 AMXS/CC,
notified the respondent he was recommending the respondent be adnaipistrag ischarged for
minor disciplinary infractions under AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5 yj the
respondent receive a general discharge. The respondent is not entitled to an admumstrative
discharge board. ,

3. EVIDENCE CONSIDERED FOR THE GOVERNMENT:

a. Investigation has disclosed that on or about 2 August 2004 at Dormitory 17D, mm
was involved in an incident where Security Forces personnel responded to a report of violence

within his room. During that invggig@atiogeit was determined that there was destruction of |
personal property. Additonal, alll an unauthorized female guest in his dormitory
room arged with assault. In a Separate dormitory incident on or about 2 April
2004, ion: charged with fleeing and eluding the CQ and Security Forces, hiding
personnel in his ae them in eluding apprehension, and failing to obey the CQ.

 
  
  
 

For this offense eceived a letter of reprimand, dated 1 September 2004.

b Pe .:. knew of his duties at or near Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, on or about

2 April 2004, was derelict in the performance ilfully failed to
refrain from providing alcohol to Airman First ho was under the

age of twenty-one, as it was his duty to do.

a. at or near Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 23 May 2004, near the
entry control point of the East Gate physically control a vehicle, to wit: a passenger car, while
the alcohol concentration in his breath was 0.160 grams of — | liters of breath or

greater as shown by chemical analysis. For the above offenses, received
nonjudicial punishment, dated 4 August 2004. ,

Cc. a. at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 15 February 2003, without
proper authority, willfully break a window in dormitory 17, military property of the United .
States, by hitting it with his hand, the amount of said damage being in the sum of about
$49.59. For this offense