Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00085
Original file (FD-2009-00085.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

      

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 

 

 

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
_| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

x
x
et sacar Jen
x
x
x
ISSUES AGL.00 INDEX NUMBER A49.00 Ge : PXHIBIT S$ SUBMITTED T TED TO THE BOARD 3:
A94,03 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
A94.05 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
13 May 2010 FD-2009-00085

psec

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

   

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL.

SAF/MRBR . AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1835 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00085

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequily or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The record indicates the
applicant was discharged for unsatisfactory performance. he applicant failed his first CDC End of Course
Test (EOC) with a score of 60% on 3 April 1996. The applicant was informed of his failing score on 24
April 1996. On or about 30 April 1996 the applicant elected to decline the EOC retest and was made fully
aware that he would be discharged from the United States Air Force for failure to progress in upgrade
training. The applicant submitted letters and performance feedback from his former co-workers attesting to
his dependability and “‘can do” attitude. No inequity or impropriety in his discharge was found in the course
of the records review. The Board concluded the character of the discharge was appropriate.

Issue 2. The applicant cited his desire to receive G.1. Bill benefits as a justification for upgrade. The Board
was sympathetic of the loss of these benefits, but this is not a matter of equity or propriety that would
warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00364

    Original file (FD2005-00364.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FI.OOR ANDREW$ AFB, M D 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. Recommend to the respondent's MAJCOM that she be cross trained and retained in the Air Force or, c. Discharge the respondent based on...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0346

    Original file (FD2002-0346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |p 092-0346 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Basis for Action: The Commander, 78" Fighter Squadron, has recommended that qian alia: separated from the service with a general discharge for failure to progress in on-the- job training (OJT), under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section E, paragraph 5.26.3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00400

    Original file (FD2003-00400.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons provided in her discharge notification letter, dated 19 October 1999, were that on five separate occasions the applicant failed her career development course (CDC) examinations. The applicant's commander initially recommended a general discharge, but after receiving an oral and written response from the applicant, he amended the discharge notification on 27 October 1999, to recommend an honorable discharge. (Atch 1-3) d. On 17 December 1997, Air Education and Training Command...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00227

    Original file (FD2005-00227.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the applicant did receive an Honorable discharge, the Board encourages the applicant to reapply for her GI Bill benefits and show the VA that-her reason and authority for discharge were for failure to pass her CDC. Though not used as a basis for your discharge, the following actions will be reviewed by the sep'aration authority: :. Although the LOR states the action was taken for the second CDC failure, it is obvious due to the date of the LOR the action was taken for the first...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00446

    Original file (FD2005-00446.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to perform assigned duties properly. This action may result in my discharge from the Air Force with an honorable discharge. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to perform assigned duties properly.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00272

    Original file (FD2003-00272.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - 7 I DENY ( INDEX NUMBER A49.00 A67.90 HEARING DATE 28 Oct 2003 CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00272 I I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. X ; a ~ p I ORDER APPOMTMG THE BOARD APPLlCATlON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE I;:,%.. 1 2 3 1 LETTER OF NOTlFlCATlON 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ~ @ ~ ~ J @ Q ~ %@ ~ COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I APWCANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISiONM RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0369

    Original file (FD2002-0369.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI,) GRADE AFSNISSAN &I A l C TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL COUNSEL YES I NO X MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY VOTE OF THE BOARD ISSUES A93.09 JNDEX NlJMlER A49.00 HEARING DATE 26 FEB 03 CASE NUMBER FD2002-0369 X I I EXHIBITS SUBMITITD TO THE BOARD I I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00003

    Original file (FD01-00003.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed. Change the Reason and Authority for Disch. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure Will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0334

    Original file (FD2002-0334.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SIGNATURE OF RECORDER INDEX NUMBER A94.05 A49.00 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 7 JAN 03 FD2002-0334 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to mei rs) mL OK APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ee TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING AIR FORCE DISCHARGE'RE VIEW BOARD...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00407

    Original file (FD-2010-00407.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No X MEMBER SITTING : HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY { xX+* X+* X+* X+* | x ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A49.00 1 J|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...