1
1 NAME; OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
1 GRADE
I AFSNISSAN
I
I
- -- ----------
I
1 r(
1
RECORD REVIEW
I L .-..-..-....-.-
1
I
I
.I AIV Rb.COKDING OF PERSONA1 AI'I'EARANCE HE I HRARlNC UA-I &
CASE NUMBER
1 I C)RI)ER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 1 APPLICATION FOR KEVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 1 LC.I..I'EII OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNFI. kI1.F
COUNSEL'S REI.EASE TO THE UOAIITIONAL EXHIBITS SUI3MI I I''D AT TIME Or
PERSONAL APPEARANCt
29 Jun 2007
APPLICANT'S ISSUE 4UD MF. BOARD'S 1)ECISIONAL. R kTIONAI. ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATThCHtD AIK FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BO4RD DECISlOhAL tWl'lON.41 E
FD-2007-00036
I
I
I
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of tlie decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Narnes and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
* Reason and Authority
+ Reenlistment Code
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
rHE AIR FORCE YLHSONNEL COUNCIL
IlARCE REVIEW BOAKU
)R. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MU 201(;2-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD IIECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2007-00036
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the rccnlistrnent code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearancc before the Ilischarge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on t11c applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of
reenlistment code are denied.
The Board linds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant contends that he should not be penalized indefinitely for a mistake he made when young. The
DRB recognized the applicant was 23 years of age when the discharge took place. I-Iowever, there is no
evidence he was immature or did not know right from wrong. The Board reviewed the entirc record and
found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The
records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, two Letters of Rcprimand, and two Records of
Individual Counseling for misconduct. The applicant received an Article 15 for being absent without
authority from his place of duty and for making a false official statement. He was punished with a reduction
in grade to Airman and 30 days of extra duty. The applicant had additional misconduct and was
administratively disciplined for financial irresponsibility, poor work perfbrmance, and dereliction of duty.
The Board opined the applicant was older than the vast ma-iority of first-tcrm members who properly adhere
to the Air Force's standards of conduct. The DRB coi~cluded that the characterization of the applicant's
discharge was appropriatc duc to the misconduct.
If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider
exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. If he should choose to exercisc his
right to a personal appearance hearing, the applica~~t should be prepared to provide the DRB with factual
evidence of the inequity and any exemplary post-service accomplishrnei~ts as well as any contributions to the
community.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the dischargc regulation and was within thc discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of thc foregoing findings, thc Hoard further concludes that there exists no Icgal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH AlC)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Scott AFB, XL on 30 Jun
00 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions).
Appeals f o r Honorable Discharge, to Change the RE Code, and Reason for Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 11 Apr 77. Enlmt Age: 21 4/12. Disch Age: 23 2/12. Educ: HS DIPL,
AFQT: N/A. A-90, E-63, G-68, M-69. PAFSC: 1W031 - Weather Apprentice.
DAS: 24 May 99.
b. Prior S v : (1) AFRes 20 Aug 98 - 27 Sep 98 (1 month 8 days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 28 Sep 98 for 6 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 09 Mo 03 Das, all AMS.
b - Grade Status: Amn - 4 May 00 (Article 15, 4 May 00)
A1C - 14 Nov 98
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 4 May 00, Scott AFB, IL - ~rticle 86. You did, in the
continental United States, on or about 9 Apr 00, absent
yourself without authority from your place of duty, the
l g t h Air Support Operations Squadron, Fort Campbell, KY,
where you were required to be and did remain so absent
until on or about 17 Apr 00 by intentionally leaving
your place of duty without submitting a leave form.
Article 86. You did, in the continental United States,
on or about 23 Nov 99 absent yourself without authority
from your place of duty, the l g t h Air Support Operations
Squadron, Fort Campbell, KY, where you were required to
be and did remain so absent until on or about 27 Nov 99,
by intentionally leaving your place of duty without
submitting a leave form. Article 107. You did, in the
continental United States, between on or about 9 Apr 00
and 17 Apr 00, with intent to deceive, make to Lt. Price
an official statement, to wit: that you had turned in a
leave form for the period of on or about 9 Apr 00 and 17
Apr 00, which statement was totally false and was then
known by you to be totally false. Reduction to Airman,
and 30 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 15 MAR 00 - Financial irresponsibility.
LOR, 15 MAR 00 - Financial irresponsibility.
RIC, 21 JAN 00 - Poor work performance.
RIC, 12 OCT 99 - Dereliction of duty.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs: AFOUA, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (10) Mos (11) Das
TAMS: (01) Yrs (09) Mos (03) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 25 Jan 07
(Change Discharge to Honorable, Change the RE Code, and Reason for
Discharge)
Issue 1: My discharge wa inequitable because it was based on actions of a
young airman who was letting his life be determined by an outside influence who
lives with regret each and every day. I miss the Air Force.
ATCH
1. DD 214.
MEMORANDUM FOR Arnn i .-----------------------------------------,
.-----------------------------------------.
FROM: 19 ASOCICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Minor Disciplinary
Infractions. The authority for this action is AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49. If my recommendation
is approved, your service may be characterized as honorable, under honorable conditions
(general) or under other than honorable conditions. I am recommending that your service be
characterized as under honorable conditions (general). ,
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On or about 12 Oct 99, you were counseled for not following your checklists and making
excessive errors. For these offenses, you received a Record of Individual Counseling
(LOC), dated 12 Oct 99. (Atch 1).
b. Between on or about 13 Oct 99 and 21 Jan 00, you were counseled for continued poor
work performance. For this offense, you received a Record of Individual Counseling
(LOC), dated 21 Jan 00. (Atch 2).
c. On 3 1 Jan 00, you failed to pay your just debts, and failed to obey an order. For these
offenses, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 15 Mar 00. {Atch 3).
d. On or about 14 March 00, you failed to pay your just debts, misused funds from the Air
Force Aid Society, made false statements regarding the state of your financial situation,
and failed to maintain proper funding in your checking account to cover the checks you
were writing. For these offenses, you received a Letter of Reprimand {LOR) dated
15 Mar 00. (Atch 4)
e. On or about 23 Nov 99 and on or about 9 Apr 00, you were AWOL. Furthermore,
between on or about 9 Apr and 17 Apr 00, you told Lt Price you submitted a leave form
covering the above dates, when in fact you had not submitted a leave form. For these
offenses, you received Non-judicial Punishment, (Article 15), dated 25 Apr 00. (Atch 5).
3. Copies of the documents to'be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached, The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force. If you are
hscharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
I have made an appointment for you to consult with the Area Defense Counsel, Bldg 7, on
t 3 A N
at 1580 hrs. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.
5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me with in 3 duty days of your receipt of this letter
unless you request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the
separation authority.
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You must report to the 375th Medical Group, Physical Examinations Section with your
medical records for a doctor to determine if further action is required.
8. The Privacy Act Statement as explained in AFI 36-3208 covers any personal information you
furnish in rebuttal. A copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the squadron orderly
room.
9. You must take the following actions:
a. You will report to the Transportation Management Office (TMO), Outbound Assignments,
to complete a Scott Air Force Base Form 241lPersonal Property Appointment Sheet. That
worksheet must be completed and returned to TMO as soon as you receive your separation
orders.
b. You will report before close of business tomorrow (or the next duty day) to Special
Actions at Military Pay, Bldg P-10, room C201, to make arrangements concerning your military
pay.
..........................................................
Commander
Attachments:
1. LOC, dated 12 Oct 99
2. LOC, dated 21 Jan 00
3. LOR, dated 15 Mar 00 wlresponse
4. LOR, dated 15 Mar 00 wlresponse
5. Article 15, dated 25 Apr 00 wlresponse
6. Airman's Acknowledgement
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00297
The misconduct includcd writing a check for $883.59 and not having sufilcient funds for payment of the said check, downloading and printing hate and racist literature on a governn~cnt computer, missed appointments, dereliction of duty, unauthorized use of a government computer, hilure to obey a direct order on divers occasions, financial irresponsibility, insubordination, failure to obey a l a w f ~ ~ l order, backing a government vehicle without a spotter, inappropriate e-mail, disrespect...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00096
The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, she signed a statement that she understood she must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: I am a single Mom working full time and going to school. LOR, dated 3 1 Mar 99 13.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0405
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. Separate ~ B a ( l l ( l l l l ( l 0 N l t h m under honorable conditions (general) discharge, with or without Probation & ~ehabaitation; c. Recommend to the Commander of the 8th Air Force that AB- be separated with an honorable discharge, with or without Probation & Rehabilitation; or d. Direct that A e given the opportunity to present his case before an...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0438
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0438 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. LOR, 27 MAY 99 - Late for duty. LOR, 21 Jul 99 13, AF Form 3070, 13 Aug 99 14, LOC, 8 Nov 99 15.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00408
For his actions, he received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 21 Jun 00; . For his actions, he received a LOC on 30 Aug 00; e. On or about 13 Sep 00, Amn: !did not report for duty as directed. For your actions, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 2 1 Jun 00; b.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD01-00091
ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Minor Disciplinary Infractions. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I should've (sic) a medical discharge when instead I got an honorable/general discharge. Recommendation: Discharge Respondent with a general discharge without P&R.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00493
The records indicate that the applicant received two Article 15s, two Letters of Reprimand, a Letter of Counseling and four Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct to include failure to obey an order, late for work, failure to properly prepare for career development course test, failure to go, making a false official statement, and financial irresponsibility. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00340
Additionally, he received two Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling, and five Records of Individual Counseling for being late for work, taking unauthorized breaks, sleeping on duty, being late for formation, financial irresponsibility, and failure to obey a lawful order. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00340 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1. For this misconduct you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00142
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) Es. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp 2993-00142 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00091
Attachment: Examiner's Brief 7 DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD VOTING CARD COUNSEL NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE AND AUTH FOR DISCHARGE (Reason) AFI 36-3208, Para 5.50.1 (Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil Authority) DD FORM 149 TOTAL ACTIVE SERVICE (Yrs - Months - Day) l ~ r l o m o s l 8 d a s Refer to SAFlMRBR DATE APPLICANT SUBMIITED 27 Feb 2003 DATE OF SEPARATION 2 4 ~ ~ 2 0 0 1 DATE RETURNED ,- 10: - INDEX: HEARING DATE 14 Nov 2003 REMARKS DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 03 Mar 2003 DATE...