I
b..-..-....-..-!
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
I
1 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI.)
.-------------------------------------------------------.
CoUyEL
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
RECORD REVIEW
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AB
X
TYPE GEN
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES
No
X
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
M
~
~
~
+
~
%
V~'@$~?RXHE BOAR@$*
1
I 2
3
4
I
ORDER APPOFNTMG THE BOAR11
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCIIARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICA'I'ION
BRlEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S E L E A S E TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXl4IRITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I TAPE RECORDMG OF PERSONAL. APPEARANCE HE
I
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
10 May 2007
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DEClSlONh R A ~ O K A L ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FOKCE DISC'HARGF: RWlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
FD-2006-00480
I
I
I
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
SECRETARY OF TIlE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL. COIINGIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING. 3RD F1.OOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7W2
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DTSCHARGE KEVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATlONALE
CASE NUhlBEH
FD-2006-00480
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He admits his misconduct was
immature in nature and somewhat impulsive. The records indicated the applicant rcceived two Articlc 15s
for misconduct. The applicant received his first Article 15 for willfully damaging fire alarms by holding a
flame next to them. He was punished with a reduction in grade to Airman Basic, a suspended forfeiture of
pay for two months, and thirty days of correctional custody. His sccond Article 15 was for failing to obey
dormitory living standards by having a female live with him in his dorm and failure to refrain from using
alcohol while under the age of 21. For this misconduct, he was punished with a forfeiture of pay, restriction
to Whiteman AFB for 30 days, and 14 days of extra duty. The DKB opined that through these
administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. 'She Board
concluded the applicant's misconduct was a signiiica~lt departure from conduct cxpected of all military
members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Keview Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board f~~rther concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
h
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVXEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH AMN)
1. MATTER UNDER REVXEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Whiteman AFB, MO on 17
Dec 03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial
to Good Order and Discipline). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 18 Jul 83. Enlmt Age: 18 5/12. Disch Age: 20 4/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-63, E-60, G-57, M-67. PAFSC: 33731 - Fire Protection Apprentice.
DAS: 20 Oct 02.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 17 Jan 02 - 22 Apr 02 (3 months 6 days)(Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 23 Apr 02 for 4 years. Svd: 01 Y ~ s 07 Mo 25 Das, all
AMS .
b. Grade Status: AB - 09 May 03 (Article 15, 9 May 03)
A m - 23 Oct 02
:
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 2 Dec 03, Whiteman AFB, MO - Article 92. You, , - - - - having
- - - - - - - - - - ,
: t o live with you in your dorm
' to wit: Domitory Living Standards and
knowledge of a lawful order issued by Lt Col ; --------------;
------------
;..-.-..-...,
Procedure, dated 22 Oct 02, an order which it was your
duty to obey, did, between on or about 20 Aug 03 and on
or about 20 Oct 03, fail to obey the same by wrongfully
allowing i
room, ~ u ~ I X f i ~ - - i - ~ ~ - ~ - , - - ~ ~ l - ~ ' n t i s
Hall, Room 33 6, Whiteman
AFB, MO. Article 92. You, who knew of your duties at
or near Warrensburg, MO, on or about 20 Oct 03, were
derelict in the performance of those duties in that you
willfully failed to refrain from consuming alcoholic
beverages until the age of 21, as it was your duty to
do. Forfeiture of $575.00 pay per month for 2 months.
Restriction to the limits of Whiternan AFB, MO for 30
days and 14 days extra duty. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
(2) 9 May 03, Whiteman AFB, MO - Article 108. You, did, on
or about 4 Mar 03, without authority, willfully damage
by holding a flame next to a fire alarm, military
property of the United States the amount of said damage
being in the sum of about $196.00. Article 80. You,
did, between on or about 15 Dec 02 to on or about 31 Jan
03, without proper authority, attempt to willfully
damage military property of the Unites States, by
holding a flame next to a fire alarm on the second floor
of Atlantis Hall. Reduction to AB. Suspended
forfeiture of $375.00 pay per month for 2 months
(subject to restitution being made to Whiteman Housing
Office in the amount of $196.00). Thirty days
correctional custody. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs : NDSM, AFTR.
i - Stmt of S v : TMS: (01) Yrs (11) Mos (01) Das
TAMS: (01) Yrs (07) Mos (25) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 18 Dec 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable.)
Issue 1: I would like an upgrade in order to complete my future goals.
Each of the offenses I comitted (sic) were immature in nature and somewhat
impulsive. My first offense was destruction of government property. It's
shameful to say but at that time I was easily influenced by my peers. My second
offense was disobying a lawful order with alchol (sic) involved. Basically I
chose the wrong girlfriend. I disobeyed an order by allowing her to stay in my
dormatory. Sinve I have been discharged I have served in Afghansitan for one
year and Iraq for elleven (sic) months. The main reason I decided to use the
skills I learned in the military working for Halliburton was because of my poor
performance in the military. I felt I owed it to my country.
Issue 2: There is no excuse for my actions in the military, but my job
performance was in good order. I still want to continue my firefighting carreer
(sic) in civilian life. With the "Generalw discharge it's more difficult. I
would hope that my performance in the middle east with Halliburton has made up
for some of my mistakes in the military. Thanks you for your consideration.
ATCH
1. Contractor Deployment Order.
1
\
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
CIVIL ENGINEERING SQUADRON (ACC)
5 0 9 ~ ~
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOlIEU
MEMORANDUM FOR AB i
.......................................................
FROM: 509 CESICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of
misconduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. The authorities for this action are AFPD
36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2. If my recommendation is approved your service may
be characterized as honorable ox under honorable condit~ions.(general>->->
I. am- recommending that.
your service be characterized as under honorable conditions (general).
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. Between on or about 20 Aug 03 and on or about 20 Oct 03, you failed to obey a lawful
order issued to you by y o u Commander in that you wrongfully allowed Kristina Harris to live
with you in your dorm room. For this incident, you received an Article 15 dated 02 Dec 03.
(Atch la)
b. On or about 20 Oct 03, you were derelict in the performance of your duties in that you
failed to refrain from consuming alcoholic beverages until the age of 2 1. For this incident, you
received an Article 15 dated 02 Dec 03. (Atch 1 b)
c-
c. On or about 04 Mar 03, you damaged government property in that you held a flame to
a fire alarm, the amount of said damage totaled $196.00. For this incident, you received an
Article 15 dated 09 May 03. In addition, this Article 15 was placed in your Unfavorable
Information File. (Atch 1 c)
d. Between on or about 15 Dec 02 and on or about 3 1 Jan 03, you attempted to damage
government property by holding a flame next to a fire alarm. For this incident, you received an
Article 15 dated 09 May 03. In addition, this Article 15 was placed in your Unfavorable
Information File. (Atch Id)
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising special court-martial convening
authority or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air
Force and, if you are discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged
you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education
assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.
For Official Use Only
c
8 Dfc 03
expense,
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
I have made an appointment for you to consult Area Defense Counsel in Bldg 509 on
at
1506
. You may also consult civilian counsel at your own
5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
unless you request
separation authority to consider must reach me by
and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will forward your statements to the separation
authority.
L 03
I I
6. If you f'ail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your rights to do so.
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to Family Practice at
o %d 0 on q 0-c c 03 for the examination, 112 D -9 4 ~ c h
1
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your unit's Commander Support Staff.
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
------ ,--*------------
p a n d e r
------------------.
Attachments:
1. Supporting documents --for the reason for discharge
a. Article 15, dated 02 Dec 03
b. Article 15, dated 02 Dec 03
c. M c l e 15, dated 09 May 03
d. Article 15, dated 09 May 03
2. Documents containing derogatory information -- which are not listed in the notification
memorandum: None.
3. Airman's receipt of notification memorandum, dated
For Official Use Only
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00269
The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, one for wrongfully using marijuana and for wrongfully using Corciden, and the other for failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty and for willfully disobeying a lawful command, a Letter of Reprimand for damaging government property, injuring his hand, fleeing the scene of the crime, and refusing to answer questions, and one Record of Individual Counseling for failing a monthly dorm room inspection. ...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00316
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. M D 20762-1002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00316 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. You, having :, to wit :...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00275
INDEX NUMBER FD-2003-00275 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SM/'MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D Q EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00111
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2003-00111 G E N E U L : The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. He had an Article 15 for signing a false official statement, making a false statement to his commander, willfully damaging government property, assaulting another airman, and harassing two other ainnen while being disorderly. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00255
You, who knew or should have known of your duties, on or about 20 Jul 03, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain from consuming alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 years, as it was your duty to do. For this failure to inform your superiors of the damage, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 27 Aug 02 (Attachment 9). For this dereliction of duty, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00167
AFI 36-3208 states that discharge for applicants with mental disorders is not appropriate, if their record supports a discharge for misconduct or unsatisfactory performance. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. Article 151 UIF, dated 10 Jul03 c. LOR, dated 18 Aug 03 d. LOC, dated 13 Aug 03 e. LOC, dated 23 Ju103 f. LOR, dated 09 Jul03 g. LOR, dated 07 Jul03 h. 509 MDOS/CC Memorandum, dated 07 Oct 03 !
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00341
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR, SIGNATURE OF TO: FROM: SAF , SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL " AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET T, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00249
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I feel that there was complete injustice done by my commander(s) .
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00471
The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, a Vacation, and two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Sleeping on Post During the time I was under investigation for the fire alarm incident, I was pulling guard duty.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0229
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0229 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would justify a change of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an...