AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
ee nie AMIN
|
TYPE
PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES NO
XxX
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
2 x
3 x
ees xX
I X
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
A95.00 A67090 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

 

 

toc FD2002-0229 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

 

 

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REMARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance, and the right to submit an application to
the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OF RE ane SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

eas Te Pe Bim

   
 
 

INDORSEMENT

DATE: 30 Oct 02

 

SAF/MIBR a , , SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL

350 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°° FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0229

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,
and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would justify a change of

discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the
available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant received an
Article 15 for damaging a vending machine and stealing money and snack food. He also received a Letters
of Reprimand, three Letters of Counseling, and a Memorandum for Record for failing his end of course
examination and was arrested and charged with larceny. The DRB opined that through these administrative
actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative/repetitive behavior. The Board
concluded the disciplinary infractions were a significant departure from the conduct expected of all military
members. The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade
of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0229
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former AMN) (HGH AIC)
MISSING DOCUMENTS

 

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 01/02/07 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.50.2 (Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline).
Appeals for Honorable Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 79/02/13. Enlmt Age: 17 1/12. Disch Age: 21 11/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-62, E-67, G-53, M-62. PAFSC: 2W151 - Aircraft Armament Systems
Journeyman. DAS: (EPR Indicates): 97/07/22-99/03/01.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 97/01/17 - 97/07/01 (5 months 15 days) (Inactive).
3s SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as 97/07/02 for 4 yrs. Svd: 03 Yrs 07 Mo 06 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: AMN - 00/06/17 (Article 15, 00/06/17)
¥ Alc - 98/11/02
AMN - 98/01/02

c. Time Lost: none.

d. ‘Art 15’s: (1) 00/06/17, Whiteman AFB, MO - Article 109. You did, on
or about 29 May 00, willfully and wrongfully damage by
pulling on the door, a privately owned vending machine,
the amount of said damage being in the sum of about
$100.00, the property of ------- Vending Incorporated.
Article 121. You did, on or about 29 May 00, steal
money and snack food items of a value of about $87.50,
the property of ------- Vending Incorporated.
Reduction to Amn, forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month
for two months, 45 days restriction, and 45 days extra
duty. (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation)

e. Additional: (SOURCE: AF FORM 286A)

LOC, 03 FEB 99 - Late for work.

LOC, 16 MAR 99 - Late for work.

LOR, 06 MAY 99 - Late for work.

20 JUL 99 - Late credit payments.

1999 - Failed End of Course examination Block A.
LOC, 17 FEB 00 - Lying.

31 MAY 00 - Arrested and charged with larceny.
g.

CM: none.

FD2002-0229

Record of SV: 97/07/02 ~- 99/03/01 Whiteman AFB 4 £(Initial)
99/03/02 - 00/03/01 Whiteman AFB 4 (Annual)
00/03/02 - 00/07/31 Whiteman AFB 1 (CRO) REF

(Discharged from Whiteman AFB)
Awards & Decs: AFAM, AFTR, AFOUA, AFGCM.

Stmt of Sv: TMS: (04) Yrs (00) Mos (21) Das
TAMS: (03) Yrs (07) Mos (06) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appin (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/05/22.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.

ATCH
none.

02/09/05/ia
ey mo | Fe2co2- O2Z7

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS 509TH BOMB WING (ACC)
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI

 

6 FEB 7001

MEMORANDUM FOR 509 MSS/DPMAR .

FROM: 509 BW/CC

 

SUBJECT: Administrative Discharge WORE

«

  
  

I have reviewed Qe ; “ wire discharge | file. The evidence contained therein is
sufficient to warrant discharge of @egaeaewier AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2 for a pattern
of misconduct. I considered probation and rehabilitation, but found them inappropriate in this
case. I have concluded tha MiRABNRAREE cisconduct and continued presence in the Air Force is
contrary to good order and discipline. I hereby direct you to Tisch cee alam om the
United States Air Force with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge, within 1 duty
day.

 

 

Attachment;
Case Filgi

  

Global Power for America