Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00418
Original file (FD2006-00418.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME O F  SERVICE MEMBER (1,AST. FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

GHA1)IS 

AFSNfSSAN 

AIR FOKC'K  DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME O F  COUNSEL AND O R  ORGANIZA I ION 

ADDRESS AND  OH OHGANI/.ATION  O F  COlINSEL 

AMERICAN  LEGION 

1608 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 

MEMBER SITTING 

HON 

I 

VOTE OF THE BQAKD 

"- 

I  UOIIIC 

- -  
I 

GEN 

OTHER 

1 

DENY 

I 
I 
EXl.IIBITS SIJBMITTED TO THE BOARD 

I 

I 

I  ORDER APPOIN'I'INCi  'I  Ilk BOARD - 

AI'I'I.IC~A'I'ION FOR REVIEW 01'  L)ISCI  IARC;E 

LETTER OF NO7'1FICA'I'ION 
BRIEF O F  PERSONNEL  Fll,b; 
COIINSEL'S  RELEASE TO THE UC)AKI) 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUHMI'TTED AT TIME OF 
PERSONAI. AIW-.AI

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0409

    Original file (FD2002-0409.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - MEMBERS SITTING HON pices DOTHC DENY INDEX NUMBER 5 __ EXHINITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A01.01, A01.43, A01.55 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 03-03-07 FD2002-0409 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF \ PERSONAL APPEARANCE = TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING NoL ARE DISCUSSED ON.THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00096

    Original file (FD2004-00096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD~2004~00096 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the characterization of service inequitable. On 15 Mar 95, you received an Article 15 for failing to maintain sufficient funds in your checking account.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00150

    Original file (FD2004-00150.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with thc procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 5 Apr 89 - 16 Nov 89 (7 months 12 days) (~nactive) . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: eenlisted as SrA 24 Feb 9 b. Grade Status: AB - 5 Oct 94 (Article 15, 5 Oct 94) c. Time Lost: None.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00212

    Original file (FD2003-00212.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0212 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change the Reason and Authority for discharge and to change the RE Code. f. On or about 20 Nov 94, you were derelict in the performance of your duties in that you willfully failed to stop during a routine traffic stop by ‘7 as it was your duty to do so, for which you received an Article 15 dated 6 Jan 95, with a reduction to the grade of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0498

    Original file (FD2002-0498.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘ial CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | yp2902-0498 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change his reenlistment code. He had one Record of Individual Counseling, two Letters of Counseling, and four Letters of Reprimand (LOR). On 18 Apr 93, you failed to report to work on time.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00394

    Original file (FD2003-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, member had an Article 15 for making a false official statement to a military police officer, and a vacation of his suspended reduction for two incidents of failure to go. At the time of the discharge, member consulted counsel and submitted a statement agreeing with the discharge action but criticizing the treatment program and requesting his service be characterized as honorable. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enld as AB 16 Nov 94 for 4 yrs.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00081

    Original file (FD2004-00081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 7 GRADE 1 AB I I . CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate undcr the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00041

    Original file (FD2005-00041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TO: SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR EORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD ELOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER m-2005-00041 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00075

    Original file (FD2003-00075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0075 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, specifically commission of a serious offense.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00142

    Original file (FD2004-00142.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE I NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUhIBER I A67.90 I . The records indicated the applicant received one Article 15 for dereliction of duty and for causing a disturbance in complete view of the public by swearing at and striking an NCO and resisting apprehension, one Letter of Reprimand for inappropriate behavior and disrespect of authority, and one Letter of Admonishment for dereliction of duty. ...