AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
1
TYPE GEN
'OUNSEL
YES
No
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
NAME OFCOUNSEI, ANI>OHOHGANI%ATION
GRADE
SRA
L..............:
RECORD REVIEW
X
ADDRESS AND OR OHCANIZATION OF COUNSKI.
AFSNISSAN
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MEMBER SITTING
HON
I -
I
UOTHC
OTHER
GEN
VOTE OF THE BOARD
I DENY
1
X
X
X
X
X
7
...................................
ISSUES
A94.05
INDEX NUMBER
A67.90
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
1
2
3
4
EYHIBITS SIMM1TT&D TO THE BOARD
ORDER API)OWTWG THE BOAKLl
4PI'I.ICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF YERSONNEL FILE
COUNSI-,I,'S RF.L.EASE TO THE I3OAK13
ADDITIONAL FXlIIBI'1S SUBMITTED A I
PERSONAI. APPEARANCE
I I M t OF
I APE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I-IF
I
13 Mar 2007
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIOUAI. RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE WVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL R4TLONAI.F
FD-2006-00380
I
I
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
'
1
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SllITF 10
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-3732
h t C R t l , \ H I OFTHE AIR FORCE P t R S O I I E I COI'YCIL
AIR FORCE DIhCH4KLE REVIF\\ BOARD
I S I S COMMAYD D R , t t Wl*rc. 3RD F I OOR
ANDREWS AFB. ~ ~ ' 2 ~ 7 6 2 - 7 1 ~ 2
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NLlMBER
FD-2006-00380
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and based on an isolated incident
after over 1 1 years of honorable service. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for
misconduct. The Article 15 was for developing a personal relationship with and accepting sexual favors
from an Airman First Class trainee, within the same training organization. EJe was punished with a reduction
in grade to Senior Airman and suspended forfeiture of pay for two months. The Board concluded the
misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization
of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider
exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. If he should choose to exercise his
right to a personal appearance hearing, the applicant should be prepared to provide the DRB with factual
evidence of the inequity and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to the
community.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substailtive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former SRA) (HGH SSGT)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Keesler AFB, MS on 24
Apr 98 UP AFI 36-3208, para 3208, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct
Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 12 Nov 67. Enlmt Age: 18 7/12. Disch Age: 30 5/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-87, E-85, G-90, M-68. PAFSC: 1W051A - Weather Forescaster
Journeyman. DAS: 8 Nov 97.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 19 Jun 86 - 15 Dec 86 (5 months 27 days)(Tnactive).
(2) Enlisted as AB 16 Dec 86 for 6 years. Extended 8 Jun 89
for 1 month. Reenlisted as SrA 10 Mar 92 for 4 years. Extended 18 Mar 94 for 1
month. A1C - 3 Feb 87. SrA - Unknown. SSgt - 1 May 93. APRs: 9,9. EPRs:
4,4,5,4,5,5,5.
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenlisted as SSgt 2 Feb 96 for 6 years, Svd: 02 Yrs 02 Mo 23 Das, all
AMS .
b, Grade Status: SrA - 20 Mar 98 (Article 15, 20 Mar 98)
C. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 20 Mar 98, Keesler AFB, MS - Article 92. You did,
between on or about 1 Jan 98 and on or about 11 Mar 98,
violate a lawful general regulation, to wit: paragraph
4.1 AETCR 30-4, dated 20 Jan 92, by wrongfully
developing a personal relationshi2
sexual favors fra-n A1C I .............................
within the same training organization. Reduced to SrA.
Suspended forfeiture of $716.00 pay per month for 2
months. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
------------
with and accepting
----------------
I a trainee
:I
e. Additional: None.
f , CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 07 Apr 95 - 06 Apr 96 McGuire AFB 5 (Annual)
07 Apr 96 - 06 Apr 97 McGuire AFB 5 (Annual)
07 Apr 97 - 02 Oct 97 McGuire AFB 5 (CRO)
h. Awards & Decs: A M , AFAM W/2 OLC, AFCM, ACM, AFLSA W/1 OLC, AFTR,
SWASM, AFOSLTR, NDSM, HSM, BMTHGR, SAEMR, NCOPMER, AFEM, NATOM, AFOUA W/2 OLC,
JMUA, AFOEA, AFGCM W/2 OLC .
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (11) Yrs (10) Mos (06) Das
TAMS: (11) Yrs (04) Mos (09) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 14 Sep 06,
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: My discharge was based on an isolated incident after 11 years and
4 months of honorable service with no other incidents on my records.
ATCH
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIREDUCATIONANDTRAININQCOMMAND
..........................................
MEMORANDUM FOR SrAi ..........................................
FROM: 334 TRSICC
i'
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum-Board Hearing
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force according to AFPD 36-
22 and AFI 36-3208 for Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline under the provisions
of Chapter 5, Section H, Paragraph 5.50.2. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the
separation authority to support this recommendation are attached.
2. My reasons for this action are: Between on or about 1 Jan 98 and on or about 11 Mar 98 you
did violate a lawful general regulation, AETC 30-4 and you were given an Article 15 for
violation of Art 92 of the UCMJ in that you wrongfully developed a a personal relationship with
and accepted sexual favors from a female student. (Atch 1, Appendix A)
3. This action could result in your separation with an under other than honorable conditions. I am
recommending that you receive a general discharge. The commander, 8 1st Training Group or
higher authority will decide whether you will make the final decision in this matter. If you are
discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be denied
enlistment in any component of the armed forces and any special pay, bonus, or education
assistance funds may be subjected to recoupment.
4. You have the right to:
. -- - - - - - a7--Consult 1 e g d ~ o u n s g L
- - -
. . . -
-
.- -- -. -
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the board hearing,
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making a decision to
waive any of your rights.
3sL
at Bldg 0701, Room 124, on 5 5 ' at s b hours.
5. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. I have made an appointment for you to
consult
Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active
military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-20 1. In addition to
military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force does not pay
expenses incident to the employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if employid, must be
readily available.
be considered with this recommendation. If you M to respond, your failure will constitute a waiver of
the right to the board hearing.
7. You must report to Physical Exams with your medical records 10 Apr 98 at 0700 for a
medical examination.
..-
-" *
-
8. Any personal information you finish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy of
AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in Bldg 4202, Rm 127.
9. If you request a board and you fiil to appear without good cause, your failure to appear constitutes
a waiver of your right to be present at the hearing.
10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Appendices:
AF FORM 3070, dtd 20 Mar 98
Commander
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0355
The records indicated the applicant received three Article 15’s for misconduct. b. Grade Status: AB - 10 Jul 98 {Article 15, 10 Jul 98) SRA - 15 Apr 98 (Article 15, Vacation, 29 May 98) SSGT - 1 Oct 96. c. Time Lost: 18 May 98 thru 26 May 98 (9 days). The respondent had two instances of negligent dereliction of duty, he made two false official statements, he committed one failure to go, two failures to obey and he was absent from his unit, all within the last nine months, and all since his...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00422
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. Issue 3: I served with honor my entire service time except for the inexcusable lapse in judgement that resulted in my administrative discharge. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00024
I had been in the Air Force for three years and 3 months when this particular Sgt accused me of misconduct. For this, you were formally counseled. Letter of Counseling (LOC), 18 Oct 99 .
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0431
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0431 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Reenld as SSgt 5 Jan 83 for 4 yrs.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00338
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00243
The misconduct included leaving the local area without approved leave, dereliction of duty, failure to follow verbal and written orders, failure to go, and disrespecting a commissioned officer on two separate occasions. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SSGT) 1. You ,,-- & g ~ i f i q knownledge of a lawful order issued by 2Lt ; ..................... to remain at the commander's call and help out, an...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00446
MD 20762-7002 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used L AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00446 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00161
During this time, the applicant's commander inappropriately used hearsay and opinion in a letter he wrote to the Medical Evaluation Board. S E R V I C E UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 26 Sep 94 for 6 yrs. Medical Board Review.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00459
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ......................... While the Board did not condone applicant's incident of misconduct, after complete consideration of the information submitted by the applicant and her compelling personnel record, the Board concluded there was sufficient mitigation and extenuation to substantiate an upgrade of discharge, to change the reason and authority and reenlistment code. If you are...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00353
MI) 20162-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Prcvious edition will be used I 1 1 1 1 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW ROAKO DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE N l l M D E R FD-2006-0034-3 GENERAL: 'I'he applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SSGT) 1. I have made an appointment for you to consult with the Area Defense Counsel, 926-5852, at 1000 hours on 7 Mar 06.