AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
GRADE
A1 C
X
RECORD REVIEW
AUDKLSSANU OK OKLANILA I ION Oh COIINSEL
---
APSNISSAN
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L..............,
4
VOTE OF THE BOARD
-- -
GEN -i UOTHC
1
O I I I ~ R [ ~
N
Y
-
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
---------------------------------.
L:
.-.-..-..-..-..-...--------------!
-
TYPE GEN
GoUNBeL
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME OF COUNSFI. AND OR ORGANIZATION
YES
No
X
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
I I O N
I
lSSlJES
A94.05
INDEX NUMBER
(
IIEARlNG DATE
08 Mar 2007
APPI.ICANT S ISSUE AND THF BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATlONdL ARE DikCUSSED ON THE 41'I'ACHED AIR FORCE DIS
FD-2006-00361
'Bow DEtSIONAL RATI0NAI.F
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
1 Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
550 C STRM WEST, SUlTE 40
RANDOT.pH AFR, TX 781 50-4742
FROM
SECRETARY OF THE AIK FOHLE PLHSONNFI COlJhCIL
AIR FORCE DISCIIARCE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762.7002
I
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NlJMBER
FD-2006-00361
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant contends her discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and based on one
isolated incident in her career. The records indicated the applicant received four Letters of Reprimand and
three Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. The misconduct included lying to supervisor,
financial irresponsibility, inappropriate behavior, failure to comply with standards, violation of medical
quarters, substandard duty performance, and making a false official statement. The DRB opined that
through these administrative actions, the applicant had alnplc opportunities to change her negative behavior.
The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military
members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AlC) (HGH AlC)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recld a GEN Disch fr USAF Randolph AFB, on 21 Apr
99 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to
Good Order and Discipline). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 4 Dec 77. Enlmt Age: 18 8/12. Disch Age: 21 4/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-79, E-76, G-84, M-42. PAFSC: 4Y031 - Dental Assitant Apprentice.
DAS: 22 May 97.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 29 Aug 96 - 29 Dec 96 (4 months 1 day) (inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 30 Dec 96 for 4 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 03 Mo 22 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A1C - 30 Apr 98
Amn - 3 0 Sun 97
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: LOR/UIF, 14 DEC 98 - Making a false official statement.
LOR/UIF, 10 AUG 98 - Substandard duty performance.
LOR, 06 MAY 98 - Violation of medical quarters.
RIC, 04 MAY 98 - Failure to comply with standards or follow
directions.
RIC, 27 JAN 98 - Inappropriate behavior.
RIC, 09 OCT 97 - Financial irresponsibility.
LOR, 07 OCT 97 - Lying to supervisor.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 30 Dec 96 - 29 Aug 98 Randolph AFB 2 ( 1 n i t i a l ) ~ ~ ~
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (02) Yrs (07) Mos (23) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (03) Mos (22) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 31 Aug 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
Dear Sir/ Ma'am,
I am Molly M, Monsivais, formerly a proud member of the US-.
I am writing
and petitioning before you today for a review and reconsideration of my separation status.
I separated h m the USAF on 21 April 1999 as an A1C. I come before you today as
words on this piece of paper in hops that you will be able to see through my eyes.
First if I may, I must state that I was raised in the military environment, as my father
m e d proudly for twenty-four years. I have the up most respect and pride in our military.
Duting my service to our country I must be adamant that I never disrespected or would of
placed many my wrong decisions that could ever impacted my career, My discharge
paperwork states that there was misconduct on my part in reasan for my separation. I
have always prided myself in truth and will admit that I did snimptesent the truth, once
and once ody. As I had been serving a short period and had requested a leave extension
by one day due to car trouble, the truth that has stayed with me to this day is that the
request was due to a relationship problem; one that could have impacted my well being
and safety. So I did as requested and called my supervisor stating that I needed an
additional day of leave. She of course did reprimand me once I returned, however never
did I wmt to tell her the true reason because of pride. This to you the review board, is the
only time that 1 ever had any misconduct during my service.
As a strong individual, I will never doubt that I am strong minded and strong willed ; this
strength it may have at times not sat well with others. I will never deny myself or self-
esteem as a person and to be able to contribute to a team. So if misconduct was speaking
truth, demanding to be treated as a person, or pushing my team member to succeed then I
am guilty of that. I will forever hold the m e d forces in my heart and hope to one day
contribute back the military as a contracted nurse. It is when I am on any base that I am
home. The military will always be a family to me.
I will be married soon to a proud member of the anned services, so I might not have had
the opportunity to continue to serve in my own name. I shall serve through him and
supporting him through his career and deployments as a military wife. My strength, my
determined will, my passion for everything in life is what has me writing to you even
almost seven years later.
So as far as my question or request, is that you review this and my record and upgrade my
status as Honorable, that would be so much more worth to me than to be listed as
General- Under honorable conditions. I thank you for your time and hope to hear back
with favorable news.
Sincerely,
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DEPARTmNT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND
I
FROM: 12 ADSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum-Administrative Discharge
1. I am recommending your discharge &om the United States Air Force for Misconduct - A
Pattern of Misconduct (Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline). The authority for this
action is Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section
H, Paragraph 5 .SO. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as
Honorable or General. I am recommending your service be characterized as General.
2. My reasons for this action are as follows:
a. On or about 5 Oct 97, you uttered false statements stating your vehicle broke down in
Lubbock, Texas, when in fact you were in Clovis, New Mexico. For this offense, you received a
Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 7 Oct 97.
b. Between 1 Jul97 and 3 1 Jul97, you borrowed $500.00 from Mrsi. .-. .. .- l and did not pay
the full amount back in the given time. For this offense you received a Letter of Counseling
&OC, AF Form 174), dated 9 Oct 97.
c. On or about 14 Jan 98, you went to a hair salon while on quarters. This is evidenced by a
Memorandum for Record ( W R ) that was accomplished on 15 Jan 98.
d. On or about 23 Jan 98, you failed to report for duty on time and provided a false official
statement. You returned late from lunch and stated you were authorized by Dr.l-.-. .: to do so.
Upon investigation, it was determined Dr,l.-. ..: gave you no such authorization. For this offense
you received an LOC, dated 27 Jan 98.
-.-.-.,
e. On diversooccasions between 17 Apr 98 and 29 Apr 98, you were derelict in the
performance of your duties in that you failed to comply with standards and guidelines required by
Dr. L - - - - + - - - i For this offense you received an LOC, dated 4 May 98.
I - - - - - - - - -
f On or about 5 May 98, after being placed on quarters, you were seen at a softball game.
For this offense you received an LOR, dated 6 May 98.
g, On diversppccasions between 29 Jul98 and 31 Jul98, you were derelict in the performance
of your duties in that you continually failed to comply with standards and guidelines required by
your superiors, For this offense, you received an LOR, dated 10 Aug 98. An Unfavorable
Information File (UIF) was created.
h. On or about 7 Aug 98, you made a false official statement, to wit: you wrote two checks
from the account of AlCi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
received an LOR, dated 14 Dec 98. This action was added to your UP.
!totaling $675.00 to pay rent. For this offense you
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction, or a
higher authority, will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force. Iā¬ you
are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be
denied enlistment in any component of the armed forces.
4. You have the right to consult legal counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist
you. An appointment has. been made for you to consult Capt ---------------_----.,
Counsel, Bldg. 399, Room B-40 (7-2274) at 1300 hours on 14 Jan 99. You may consult civilian
legal counsel at your own expense.
......................
: Area Defense
5. You have the right to submit statements on your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by 2 5 T4 A/ 97. unless you request and receive
an extension, in writing, for showing good cause. I will send them to the separation authority.
6. If you fail to consult counsel or submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
consume no alcohol for 72 hours prior to this examination.
a DD Form 2697. You must fast for 12 hours prior and
cal examination. You must report to the Primary Care
8. You must report to 12 MSSIDPMARS (Separations) within 24 hours of this notification.
9. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act. A copy of
Am 36-3208 is available for your use in the unit personnel office.
10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and r e t h it to me immediately.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Commander, 12 ADS
Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents
a, LOR, dated 7 Oct 97
b. LOC, dated 9 Oct 97
c. MFR, dated 15 Jan 98
d. LOC, dated 27 Jan 98
e. LOC, dated 4 May 98 w/ attachments
f. LOR, dated 6 May 98 w/ attachments
g. LOR, dated 10 Aug 98 w/ attachments
h. LOR, dated 14 Dec 98 w/ attachments
2. Airman's Receipt of Notification Memorandum
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00089
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | py93_o989 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. This is evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 29 Jul 98. e. On 24 Aug 98, you were late for a Y2K meeting. You must report to 12 MSS/DPMARS (Separations) within 24 hours of this notification.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00116
The Board concluded that there was no inequity or impropriety as concerns the reason and authority for pplicant's discharge and denied the requested relief, noting that the case file contained one Article 15, two JORs, one LOA, and 4 RICs for misconduct to include failure to go, violating quarters restrictions, .ircurnventing his chain of command, careless driving, involvement in verbal and physical altercations with US ex-girlfriend, falsifying a leave document, and failure to meet training...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00325
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2006-00325 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. For failing to perform assigned duties properly, you received an RIC...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00225
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for assaulting his wife and for damaging a wall in base housing. I In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for I Attachment: Examiner's Brief I I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. b. Grade Status: AB - 13 Jan 99 (Article 15, 13 Jan 99) A1C - 30 NOV 97 Amn - 31 Jan 97 c. Time Lost: None.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00039
The Board noted that applicant signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on September 13, 1996) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. (Atch Ic) d. On 25 August 1998, you received a letter of counseling (LOC) for failing to report for duty at the time...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD01-00032
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-00032 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change the Reason for discharge and change the RE Code. ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct ā Minor Disciplinary Infractions. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD-01-00032 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) 1.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00044
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1. place of duty, for this you received a Letter of Counseling on 3 Dec 97. b.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0546
His misconduct included two instances of failure to obey lawful orders, two incidents of dereliction of duty, at least two instances of failure to maintain his uniforms and personal hygiene standards, failure to go, failing to follow government vehicle operating instructions resulting in an accident, violating the base visitor sponsorship policy, providing alcoholic beverages to another airman who was under the legal drinking age, and soliciting that airman to make a false statement. ...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0438
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0438 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. LOR, 27 MAY 99 - Late for duty. LOR, 21 Jul 99 13, AF Form 3070, 13 Aug 99 14, LOC, 8 Nov 99 15.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00054
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process. In addition, he was 3 overnment Credit Card account in the amount of received a Letter of Reprimand w/atch, dated 29 Oct 99. minimum Air Force s received a referral ā2ā EPR for failing to maintain I k. On 3 Dec 99,...