I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
M A 1117 nr: c r n r r l r r r r - r r n v n 11 A C T F I P ~ T ~ l n n r , ~ ,
INITIAL)
GRADE
AB
I
X
AFSNlSS AN
RECORDREVIEb
TYPE GEN
caws*
1
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
HON
I
VQTE OF THE BOARD
GEN
UOTHC
/ OTHER]=
ISSUES A94.05
INDEX ~ L ~ ~ B E R
- - - . - - -
A67.10
I
I,
I
EXfiIBITS SUBMIITED Td) THE BOARD
( 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 1 LETTER OF NOTlFICATION
4
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
15 Dec 2005
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AM) THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAI, ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
1
TAPE RECORDING
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
I Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
--
* --
TO:
I
SAFJMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUlTE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
I I T U V * ~ U...-NT
'I -
--
. .
FROM:
DATE: l2115L!005
--
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
I
I
1
I
I
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2005-00222
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board ( D M ) but declined to
exercise this right.
I The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. I
I
I FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the
applicant received two Article 15s, a Vacation action under the UCMJ and a Letter of Reprimand for failure
to perform assigned duties, DWI, and failure to go. The DRF3 opined that through these administrative
actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the
misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization
of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
I Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Travis AFB, CA on 17 Sep 93
UP AFR 39-10, para 5-46 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals
for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 10 Jun 68. Enlmt Age: 23 4/12. Disch Age: 25 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-54, E-46, G-55, M-41. PAFSC: 90830 - Apprentice Public Health
Specialist. DAS: 17 Jun 92.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 11 Oct 91 - 5 Jan 92 (2 months 26 days)(Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as A1C 6 Jan 92 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 8 Mo 12 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AB - 28 Jul 93 (Article 15, 27 Jul 93)
A m - 23 Sep 92 (Vacation of Article 15, 20 Jan 93)
c. Time Lost: --None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 27 Jul 93, Misawa AB, Japan - Article 86. You did, on
or about 19 Jul 93, without authority, fail to go at the
time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
Reduction to AB. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
I
I
(2) 20 Jan 93, Vacation, Misawa AB, Japan - Article 86.
You did, on or about 31 Dec 92, fail to go at the time
prescribed to your appointed place of duty. Reduction
to ATrman. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
(3) 23 Sep 92, Misawa AB, Japan - Article 111. You did, on
or about 6 Sep 92, operate a vehicle, to wit: a
passenger car, while drunk. Suspended reduction to
Airman. Forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for two
months, and 30 days restriction. (Appeal/Withdrawn) (No
mitigat ion)
e. Additional: LOR, 16 OCT 92 - Failed to perform assigned duties.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFOSLTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs (11) Mos ( 7 ) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs (8) MOS (12) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 6 Jun 0 5 .
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: Because my General Discharge was due to minor disciplinary
infractions and I was told that it could be requested to be honorable discharge
ATCH
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
'.
PACIFIC A I R FORCES
2 3 Aug 9 3
FROM:
432 )E/CC
Unit 502-1
AFO AP 95319-5024
SUBJ:
' N o t i f i c a t i o n L e t t e r
TO:
1. I an recommending your d i s c h s r g e from t h e United S t a t e s A i r Force f o r
x i n o r d i s c i p l i n a r y i n f r a c t i o n s . The a u t h c r i t y f o r t h i s a c t i o n i s APR 33-18,
paragraph 5-40.
c h a r a c t e r i z e d a s general.
I f my recommendation i s approved, your s e r v i c e w i l l be
2. My reasons f o r t h i s a c t i o n a r e :
a . On 06 Sep 92, you operated 2 a o t o r v e h i c l e , a POV r e g i s t e r e d i n yozr
-
name, while i.ntoj:icated. Early on that n o ~ n i n g , yo!^ v e r e d r i v i n g from Misam
t o Hachinohe when you ran your v e h i c l e o f f of t h e road .md i n t o a drainage
d i t c h . You were apprehended by 432 SPS upon e n t e r i n g t h e ?.lain Gacc tl+ M~F.YE
PJ3 a t approximately 0518 hours t h a t -5rnir.g. Your Blood Alcohol Content t h a t
morning was .15 p e r c e n t . A s a r e s u l t of t h i s xisconduct, you received a2
A r t i c l e 15 on 23'Sep 92 by which you f o r f e i t e d $20@.@0 of your m i l i t a r y pay
p e r month f o r two months, were r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e l i m i t s of Hisawa A!3
f o r 38
d a y s , and were reduced t o t h e grade of A i L m s r L , t o be suspended u n t i l 21 Mar
93.
4 were revoked f c r one year.
Furthermore, your. p r i v i l e g e s t o o p e r a t e a a o t o r v e h i c l e as p e r USPJ Pm
b. On 10 Oct 92, you f a i l e d t z ~ e r f z m ~ s s i g n e d dl-!ties p r o p e r l y . Cn t h a t
d a t e you d i s r e g a r d e d your s u p e n r i s c r ' s i n s t r u c t i o n s t o p e r f o m r e c e i p t
i n s p e c t i o n of a i r - l i f t e d prcduce a t t h e 1lisz:la .El Commissary. Due t o t h i s
f a i l u r e on your p a r t , Commissary personnel were unable t o determine t h e
a r r i v a l c o n d i t i o n of produce, nor i n v e s t i g a t e claims f o r over-aged produce.
Tbese subsequent i n a b i l i t i e s r e s u l t e d i n monetary l o s s t o t h e commissary due
t o t h e need t o pay srtch claims. F.s 3 r e s i r l t ~f t h i s misconduct, you ~ D C C ~ ~ Y P ?
a S e t t e r of Reprimand frcm y s c r s u y r v i z s r , dated 15 Oct 9 2 .
c. On 31 Dec 92, you f a i l e d t o r e y n r t i n y o u r + ~ t y s e c t i c n a t t h e
1 . l i l i t a r y P u b l i c Health Food I n s p e c t i o n O f f i c e , a s a r e s u l t of which .+ino+her
merlber was compelled t o cover f o r you until p u r a r r i v a l . Upoz h i s -arri;:z~l,
your s u b s t i t u t . e discovered t h a t ~;c.u kcd f a i l e d tc secilrs s e n s i t i v e p r o p e r t y
p r i o r t o your d e p a r t u r e on your previous s h i f t , a stamp used t o ackqowledge US
government acceptance of vendor-supplied products. As s. r e s u l t c ~ f your
f a i l u r e t o go, your previous suspended r z ? ~ c t i o n t o ' a i ~ ~ r n
v a s vacated,
e f f e c t i v e 20 Jan 9 3 . Your d a t e of rak as Aiman h e c a m 23 Sep 32.
d. On 19 Jul 93, you again f a i l e d tc r e p o r t t o \Tour d u t y s e c t i c n a t t h e
Mj.litary P u b l i c Health Food Irrs!:.i-ytj 99 Q f f ice b;cz.use you c \ : ~ r s l e p t . !'3?n p u
d i d a r r i v e ~t work, your s u p e r v i s a r ilcticed :.n
odor- qf a l c ~ h c l or. your b r s a t k
and t h a t your eyes were red. 3s a r e s u l t of t h i s ~ i s c c n d l x t , ycu received an
A r t i c l e 15 on 28 J u l 93, by vhich yo:l v e r e redi-wed t o t h e grade of Aiman
E a s i c with a new d a t e of ra-pk of 2 8 J u l 93.
3. You have t h e r i g h t t o c o n s u l t c c u n s e l .
o b t a i n e d t o a s s i s t you. I have a r r a n g e d f o r you t o consul
r e a Defense Counsel, a t 1500 h o u r s on 24 Aug 93.
l i i l i t a r y l e g a l counsel h a s been
a t your own expense.
4 . YOU have t h e r i g h t t o submit s t a t e m e n t s i n your ovri b e h a l f . Any
s t a t e m e n t s you want t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y t o consider must r e a c h me by
I&&)-
Aug 93, w i t h i n t h r e e d u t y days of your r e c e i p t of t h i s
l e t t e r , u n l e s s you r e q u e s t and r e c e i v e an e x t e n s i o n f o r good cause shocm. I
w i l l send them t o t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y .
hours on
5. If you f a i l t o c o n s u l t counsel o r submit s t a t e m e n t s i n your own b e h a l f ,
your f a i l u r e w i l l c o n s t i t u t e a waiver o f your r i g h t t o do s o .
6 . You have been scheduled f o r a medical examination. You must r e p o r t t o t h e
P h y s i c a l Examinations c l i n i c a t t h e base h o s p i t a l , 432d Medical Group. cn
24 Aug 93 a t 0700 h r s f o r t h i s examination. You should n o t e a t f o r 14 hours
p r i o r t o t h i s exam, and b r i n g any e y e g l a s s e s you wear t o t h e exam.
7. Any p e r s o n a l information you f u r n i s h i n r e b u t t a l i s covered by t h e P r i v a c y
Act Statement a s explained i n .WR 39-10, attachmznt 6 . A copy of AE'R 39-10 is
a v a i l a b l e f o r your use i n t h e Orderly Room.
5 A t s h s
1. A r t i c l e 15, 23 Sep 9 2 ,
w/atchs
2 . LOR. 16 O c t 92
3. AF Form 366, 2 0 J a n 9 3
:-l/,atchs
. 4 . A r t i c l e 1 5 , 27 J u l 93,
5.
w/atchs
432 bfG/SGAQ l t r ,
2 0 J u l 9 3
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00362
On 3 Nuv 9 2 , you were i n v i o l a t i o n of AFR 35-10. r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r of C o u n s e l i n g on 6 Nov 92 (Tab 1 - 1 0 ) . You must consult legal counsel before making a daei~ion to waive any of your rights. 23 Aug 9 1 , LOR/UIF; 2 J u l 92, MFR: 22 Sep 9 2 , LOC; 6 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 13 Gct 9 2 , LOR; 16 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 28 Oct 92, LOR/UIF/Control Roster; 2 Nov 9 2 , LOR; 4 Nov 92, MFR; 6 Nov 9 2 , LOC; 12 Nov 92, LOR 2 .
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0006
Attachment : Examiner's Brief I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2 0 02 - 0.0 0 6 (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. RECOMMENDATION: Respondent’s misconduct and unwillingness t o conform his H i s service behavior t o Air Force s t a n d a r d s support h i s immediate separation. c. Your duty performance was Substandard, This is evidenced by Letter of Reprimand, by the Commander, dated 5 May 92 (atch c).
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00192
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I GRADE I AFSN/SSAN TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I x RECORDREVIEW I MEMBER SITTING I HON I GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY A92.21 HEARING DATE 23 Sep 2003 CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00192 Case heard at Washington, D.C. 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSOhPiEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHlBlTS SUBMITTED AT TIME...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00042
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct--Commission of a Serious Offense Issue 1 : Applicant contends that he was young and immature. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. I have been out of the United States Air Force for roughly thirteen years, but not a day goes by that I do not think about the good memories, and childish mistakes that I made.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00170
.. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00170 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. Svd: 1 Yrs 6 Mo 22 Das, all AMS b. Grade Status: AB - 19 Sep 90 (Vacation of...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00471
The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, a Vacation, and two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Sleeping on Post During the time I was under investigation for the fire alarm incident, I was pulling guard duty.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00307
- - - I- / Y ~ ~ M E OF SERVICE MF:RIHYH -- AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD .- - -. 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, M D 20762-70U2 1 -.A AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE HEVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATlONALE I FD-2005-00307 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorablc, to change thc reason and authority for the discharge, and to changc the reenlist~nent code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00034
4 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00034 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Records review revealed that the applicant received an Article 15 for wronghlly using marijuana on or about April 30, 1985 and a second Article 15 for failure to obey a lawhl order while in correctional custody. Today I have prescribe medication Also, there is a letter from my therapist Dr. ------ Please - ATCH 1.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00137
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00137 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. LOC , LOC , LOC , LOR, 25 MAY 90 19 MAY 89 20 APR 89 01 MAR 89 - Late for duty. S u p p o r t i n g Documents a AF Form 3070, s e r v e d 6 Nov 9 0 , w / a t c h b LOR, d a t e d 1 3 J u l 90 w / a t c h c LOC, d a t e d 25 May 90 d LOC, d a t e d 19 May 89 e...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00406
(Change Discharge to Honorable) Issues: My discharge was inequitable because it was an isolated incident. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 91/07/17 for 4 yrs. Copies of t h e documents t o be forwarded t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y i n support o f t h i s recommendation a r e attached.