AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GKAUE
AMN
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
NAME OF CO~INSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS A N 0 OH ORGANIZ.4TION OF COUNSEL
TYPE GEN
, ,,,,,COUNSEL
YE!,
No
I
MEMBER SITTING
l ION
GEN
UOTHC
C)'l'IIER
X
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED'I'O THE BOARD
I
I
I
I
2
3
4
1
ORDER AI'POIN I'ING THE BOARD
APPLICA'l ION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTFK OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BCIAKI)
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS S I J H M 1.1 .I FD AT TIME or
PERSONAI. APPI'ARANCE
'I'APE RECORDMG OF PERSONAL. APPEARANCE HE
IlEARlNG DATE
CASE NllMRKK
25 Jul2007
APPLICANT'S ISSlfE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCKSSED ON ME Al\11'AC'HED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAR0 DECISlOhAI. RATIOVALE
FD-2006-00277
I
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to s u b t n i t an
application to the AFRCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's r e q u e s t .
550 C STREET WkS1. SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, 1 X 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
SFCREIAKY OF THE AIR FORCF PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DlSCHARGh HhVlEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AbB, M D 20762 7002
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will b e used
1
1
I
I
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2006-00277
GENERAL: The applicant appeals Ibr upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE:
The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service
record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case
on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated the applicant had a Special Court Martial
for making a false official statement to a physician and trying to avoid her service as a Security Forces
member by exaggerating headaches. She was sentenced to 60 days of hard labor without conlinement,
forfeiture of pay for three months, reduction in grade to Airman and restriction to Minot AFB for 30 days.
'The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change
her negative behavior. The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from
conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applieai~t
was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
dischargc authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH AlC)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recfd a GEN Disch fr USAF Minot AFB, ND on 10 Jan
00 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions).
Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 12 Oct 76. Enlmt Age: 21 7/12. Disch Age: 23 2/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-24, E-29, G-37, M-27. PAFSC: 3P031 - Security Forces Apprentice.
DAS: 29 Jan 99.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 28 May 98 - 15 Sep 98 (3 months 18 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as A m 16 Sep 98 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 03 Mo 25 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A m - 29 Oct 99 (SPCMO#~, 17 Nov 99)
A1C - Unknown
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15,s: None.
e. Additional: LOR, 03 DEC 99 - Making a false statement.
LOR, 15 NOV 99 - Involved in a verbal confrontation.
LOR, 21 OCT 99 - Failure to go.
f. CM: Special Court Martial Order No.1 - 17 Nov 99
CHARGE T: Article 107. Plea: NG. Finding: G.
Specification: In that, A1C ; .-.-..-..-..-..-..-..-
- - - - - - - ,
Security Forces Squadron, Minot AFB, ND, did at or near Minot , AFB,
ND, on or about: 3 Jun 99, with intent to deceive make to Captm
.---------------
'..-..-.'
' 6 ~ ~ € 5 f i i i ~ , to wit: "Tried Parafon and Motrin and not helping muchtt
or words to that effect, which statement was false in that she had
not tried the Parafon Forte, and was then known by her to be so
false. Plea: NG. Finding: G.
i, a physician with the sth Medical Group, an official
> US Air Force, 5th
CHARGE 11: Article 115. Plea: NG. Finding: G.
Specification: Tn that, AlC: .....................
Security Forces Squadron, Minot AFB, ND, di'd at or near Minot AFB,
ND, from on or about 1 Jun 99 to about 21 Jun 99, for the purpose
:, US Air Force, 5th
.-----------------------
of avoiding her service as a Security Forces member, feign and/or
exaggerate headaches. Plea: NG. Finding: G. Sentence adjudged
on 15 Oct 99: Hard labor without confinement for 60 days,
forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 3 months, reduction to
airman, and restriction to Minot AFB, ND for 30 days.
g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs: NDSM, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs ( 0 7 ) Mos (13) Das
TAMS: (01) Yrs (03) Mos (25) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 25 J u l 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.
ATCH
None.
@ /3~6-"0"77
U.S. AIR FORCE
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
H E A D O U A R T ~ A ~ stn BOMB WIN^ (AGG)
MINOT AIR FORGE DAEE. NORTH DAKOTA @
1947- 199f
MEMORANDUM FOR AMN;
................................................
. .-.-.-.-.-.-.
.. .. .- -- -- ------------- -- -- -- -- --?
: 5 SFS
FROM: 5 SFSICC
SUBJECT: Letter of Notification - AFI 36-3208, Paragraph 5.49.
J*UJ .c! 2 2%
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct,
specifically, minor disciplinary infractions. The authority for this action is AFI 36-3208,
Section H, paragraph 5.49. If my recommendation is approved, your discharge will be
characterized as general or honorable. I am recommending that your service be
characterized as general.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On or about 3 Oct 99, you failed to go at the time prescribed to your appointed
place of duty. You were given a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) on 21 Oct 99. (Atch 3)
b. On or about 13 Nov 99, you were involved in a verbal confrontation with another
military member which was almost escalated because of your hand gestures etc. You
were given a LOR on 15 Nov 99. (Atch 4)
c. On or about 15 Oct 99, you were convicted by a Special Court-Martial. You were
sentenced to hard labor without confinement for 60 days, forfeiture of $200.00 pay per
month for 3 months, reduction to airman, and restricted to Minot Air Force Base for 30
days for the following offenses (Atch 5):
(I) You did on or about 3 Jun 99, with intent to deceive, make to a
Commissioned Officer an official statement, to wit: "Tried Parafon and Motrin and not
helping muchn or words to that effect, which statement was false in that you had not
tried the Parafon Forte, and was then known by you to be so false.
(2) You did on or about I Jun 99 to on or about 21 Jun 99, for the purpose of
avoiding your service as a Security Forces member, feign andlor exaggerate
headaches.
d. It was made known, by matters you submitted to the Convening Authority, that
you made a false statement, to wit: "I have also been carrying out my restriction to base
since 15 Oct 99.. ..I ask that you take the time that I have been wearing my reduced
Golden Lqacy, Boundless Future.. . Your Nation 's Air Force
SPCMO No. 5, 10 September 1999, was the last SPCMO of this headquarters
published in FY99
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 5TH BOMB WING
MlNOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 58705-5038
Special Cou rt-Martial Order
No. 1
17 November 1999
.-----------------------------------------------
3 United States Air Force,
AIRMAN FIRST CLASS i
5th security Forces Squadron, was arraigned at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, on
the following offenses at a court-martial convened by this headquarters.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHARGE I: ARTICLE 107. Plea: NG. Finding: G.
I.-..-.-..-..-....--
......................
Specification: In that, Airman First Class; -,----------------,,
Security Forces Squadron, Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, did at or near Minot Air
Force Base, North Dakota, on or about 3 June 1999, with intent to deceive make to
Capti ---------------------- i a physician with the sth Medical Group, an official statement, to
wit: "Tried Parafon and Motrin and not helping much" or words to that effect, which
statement was false in that she had not tried the Parafon Forte, and was then known by
her to be so false. Plea: NG. Fidding: G.
: United States Air Force, 5Ih
CHARGE II: ARTICLE 115, Plea: NG. Finding: G.
Specification: In that, Airman First Class: -.-..-.-..-..-....-
Security Forces Squadron, Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, did, at or near Minot Air
Force Base, North Dakota from on or about 1 June 1999 to about 21 June 1999, for the
purpose of avoiding her service as a Security Forces member, feign and/or exaggerate
headaches. Plea: NG. Finding: G.
j : United States Air Force, 5'
SPCMO No. 1
SENTENCE
Sentence adjudged by officer and enlisted members on 15 October 1999: Hard labor
without confinement for 60 days, forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 3 months,
reduction to airman, and restriction to Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota for 30 days.
In the case of Alf3MAN FIRST CLASS i-. .-. .. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-.-. .-. .-. .-. .-.-. .-. .-. .-,
States Air Force, 5" Security Forces Squadron, the sentence is approved and will be
executed.
: United
ACTION
-----------------------------------------------.
..........................................................
Commander
FOR T Y O M M A N D E R
.--------
..........................................
- .......................
,,$ taff Judge ~ d v o w
--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a
,L-.
\
: 5 SFS, 330 Tanker Trail, Minot AFB, ND 58705 (ACC)
: 5 CES, 320 Peacekeeper Place, Minot AFB, ND 58705
.------------------.
1 - AmnL .....................
1 - Lt Coli ..-..-....-..-..-..--:#
(PRES)
1 - Lt Col : b....-..-..-..-..-.-..-. ; AF LSNJAJT3, Central Circuit, Randolph AFB, TX 781 50
- -' I-----------------------.
,-..-. .. .-. .-. .-. .-. .. .-. .-. .
(MJ)
1 - Capt: . . - . . - . . - . - . . - . . - . . - - - - - - - - - I I
! 5 BWIJA 300 Summit Drive, Suite 21 1, Minot AFB, ND
58705 (TGl--------------------
1 - Mai. ; .-.-,-.,..-..-....---,
58705 (ATC)
: 5 BWIJA 300 Summit Drive, Suite 21 1, Minot AFB, ND
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00342
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the applicant’s punitive discharge by Special Court Martial was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis as an act of clemency for change of discharge. Finding: Not Guilty, but Guilty of Violation of Article 130. 4 at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, on or about 17 Specification: Did, June 1989, in the nighttime.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00256
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and four Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of thc discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. MATTERS SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT: On 7 Dec 04, A1 ~ i - - - - - - - ' :was given the opportunity to...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00468
iAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 GRADE 1 AIC 1 AFSNISSAN .--------------. AF FM 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, 3 Feb 99 5. AF FM 1 168, Statement of A1 C ;:::i, : 20 Jul99 17.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00355
d. Art 15's: (1) 27 Sep 95, Minot AFB, ND - Article 92. You were given an LOR, 13 Sep 93. e. Between on or about 15 Jun 93 and on or about 25 Aug 93, you did, at or near Minot Air ; You were given Force Base, North Dakota, commit sexual harassment toward; L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , an LOR, 13 Sep 93. Military legal - - counsel I have made an appointment for you to consult C a p t a ~ office, 300 Summit Drive, Room 306A, a t u hours,in- counsel at your own expense.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00330
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00361
He also received three Letters of Reprimand for disobeying a lawful order, making a false official statement and dereliction of duty; three Letters of Counseling for sleeping on duty, financial irresponsibility and reporting late to training; a Letter of Admonishment for failure to go to appointed place of duty; and a Record of Individual Counseling for misconduct. Attachment: Examiner's Brief - DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD -----------------------. (Change...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00048
Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00048 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ee (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. Appeals for Honorable Discharge, to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. (Atch 8-9) e. On or about 12 Feb 00, you were posted on stand-by for “D” Flight security duties.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0049
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2002-0049 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. At the time of the discharge, applicant consulted counsel but failed to submit a statement in his own behalf. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: Upon discharge from the Air Force, I was informed that year, my General Discharge under Honorable Conditions would be upgraded to Honorable Discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0073
ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Commission of a Serious Offense. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0073 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ES (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) 1, MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 96/01/03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.52 (Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense). 02/06/04/ia Pp2edz2- C075 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 319%H AIR RECUELING WING...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00282
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASL NUMBER FD-2(,06-00282 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable The applicant requested a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRR) and was scheduled for an appearance on 19 April 2007 at Andrews AFB, MD, but he did not keep the appointment or call to reschedule. The Board finds the...