Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00277
Original file (FD2006-00277.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

GKAUE 

AMN 

I 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

I 

NAME OF CO~INSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 

ADDRESS A N 0  OH ORGANIZ.4TION OF COUNSEL 

TYPE  GEN 

,  ,,,,,COUNSEL 
YE!, 

No 

I 

MEMBER SITTING 

l ION 

GEN 

UOTHC 

C)'l'IIER 

X 

EXHIBITS SUBMITTED'I'O THE BOARD 

I 

I 

I 

I 
2 
3 
4 

1 

ORDER AI'POIN  I'ING  THE BOARD 
APPLICA'l ION  FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
LETTFK OF NOTIFICATION 
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 
COUNSEL'S  RELEASE TO THE BCIAKI) 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS S I J H M  1.1  .I FD AT TIME  or 
PERSONAI. APPI'ARANCE 

'I'APE RECORDMG  OF PERSONAL. APPEARANCE HE 

IlEARlNG  DATE 

CASE NllMRKK 

25 Jul2007 
APPLICANT'S  ISSlfE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL  RATIONAL  ARE DISCKSSED ON ME  Al\11'AC'HED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAR0 DECISlOhAI. RATIOVALE 

FD-2006-00277 

I 

Case heard  in Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to s u b t n i t  an 
application to the AFRCMR. 

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's  r e q u e s t .  

550 C STREET WkS1.  SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB,  1 X 78150-4742 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

SFCREIAKY OF THE AIR  FORCF  PERSONNEL  COUNCIL 
AIR FORCE DlSCHARGh  HhVlEW BOARD 
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR 
ANDREWS AbB, M D  20762  7002 

I 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will  b e  used 

1 

1 

I 

I 

I 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 

FD-2006-00277 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals Ibr upgrade of discharge to honorable. 

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to 
exercise this right. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied. 

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and 
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify  a change of 
discharge. 

ISSUE: 

The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service 
record.  The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case 
on which to base an upgrade of discharge.  The records indicated the applicant had a Special Court Martial 
for making a false official statement to a physician and trying to avoid her service as a Security Forces 
member by exaggerating headaches.  She was sentenced to 60 days of hard labor without conlinement, 
forfeiture of pay for three months, reduction in grade to Airman and restriction to Minot AFB for 30 days. 
'The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change 
her negative behavior.  The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from 
conduct expected of all military members.  The characterization of the discharge received by the applieai~t 
was found to be appropriate. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the 
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the 
dischargc authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB,  MD 

(Former AMN)  (HGH AlC) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl recfd a GEN Disch fr USAF Minot AFB, ND  on 10 Jan 
00 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct -  Minor Disciplinary Infractions). 
Appeals for Honorable Discharge. 

2 .   BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 12 Oct 76.  Enlmt Age: 21 7/12.  Disch Age: 23 2/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 
AFQT: N/A.  A-24,  E-29,  G-37,  M-27. PAFSC: 3P031 -  Security Forces Apprentice. 
DAS: 29 Jan 99. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 28 May 98 -  15 Sep 98  (3 months 18 days) (Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as A m  16 Sep 98 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 03 Mo 25 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  A m  -  29 Oct 99 (SPCMO#~, 17 Nov 99) 

A1C -  Unknown 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 15,s:  None. 

e.  Additional: LOR, 03 DEC 99 - Making a false statement. 

LOR, 15 NOV 99 -  Involved in a verbal confrontation. 
LOR, 21 OCT 99 -  Failure to go. 

f.  CM:  Special Court Martial Order No.1 -  17 Nov 99 

CHARGE T:  Article 107.  Plea: NG.  Finding: G. 
Specification:  In that, A1C ; .-.-..-..-..-..-..-..- 
- - - - - - - , 
Security Forces Squadron, Minot AFB, ND, did at or near Minot , AFB, 
ND, on or about: 3 Jun 99, with intent to deceive make to Captm 
.--------------- 
'..-..-.' 
' 6 ~ ~ € 5 f i i i ~ ,  to wit: "Tried Parafon and Motrin and not helping muchtt 
or words to that effect, which statement was false in that she had 
not tried the Parafon Forte, and was then known by her to be so 
false.  Plea: NG.  Finding: G. 

i,  a physician with the sth Medical Group, an official 

>  US Air Force, 5th 

CHARGE 11:  Article 115.  Plea: NG.  Finding: G. 

Specification:  Tn that, AlC: ..................... 
Security Forces Squadron, Minot AFB, ND,  di'd  at or near Minot AFB, 
ND, from on or about 1 Jun 99 to about 21 Jun  99, for the purpose 

:,  US Air Force, 5th 

.----------------------- 

of avoiding her service as a Security Forces member, feign and/or 
exaggerate headaches.  Plea: NG.  Finding: G.  Sentence adjudged 
on 15 Oct 99:  Hard labor without confinement for 60 days, 
forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 3 months, reduction to 
airman, and restriction to Minot AFB, ND for 30 days. 

g.  Record of SV: None. 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  NDSM, AFTR. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS: (01) Yrs  ( 0 7 )  Mos  (13) Das 
TAMS:  (01) Yrs  (03) Mos  (25) Das 

4 .   BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 25 J u l   06. 

(Change Discharge to Honorable) 

NO ISSUES SUBMITTED. 

ATCH 
None. 

@  /3~6-"0"77 

U.S. AIR FORCE 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

H E A D O U A R T ~ A ~  stn BOMB  WIN^ (AGG) 

MINOT AIR  FORGE DAEE.  NORTH DAKOTA  @ 

1947- 199f 

MEMORANDUM FOR AMN; 

................................................ 
. .-.-.-.-.-.-. 

.. .. .- -- -- ------------- -- -- -- -- --? 

: 5 SFS 

FROM:  5 SFSICC 
SUBJECT:  Letter of Notification - AFI 36-3208, Paragraph 5.49. 

J*UJ  .c! 2 2% 

1.  I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, 
specifically, minor disciplinary infractions.  The authority for this action is AFI 36-3208, 
Section H,  paragraph 5.49.  If my recommendation is approved, your discharge will  be 
characterized as general or honorable.  I am recommending that your service be 
characterized as general. 

2.  My reasons for this action are: 

a.  On or about 3 Oct 99, you failed to go at the time prescribed to your appointed 

place of duty.  You were given a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) on 21 Oct 99.  (Atch 3) 

b.  On or about 13 Nov 99, you were involved in a verbal confrontation with another 
military member which was almost escalated because of your hand gestures etc.  You 
were given a LOR on 15 Nov 99.  (Atch 4) 

c.  On or about 15 Oct 99, you were convicted by a Special Court-Martial.  You were 
sentenced to hard labor without confinement for 60 days, forfeiture of $200.00 pay per 
month for 3 months, reduction to airman, and restricted to Minot Air Force Base for 30 
days for the following offenses (Atch 5): 

(I)  You did on or about 3 Jun 99, with intent to deceive, make to a 

Commissioned Officer an official statement, to wit:  "Tried Parafon and Motrin and not 
helping muchn or words to that effect, which statement was false in that you had not 
tried the Parafon Forte, and was then known by you to be so false. 

(2)  You did on or about I Jun 99 to on or about 21 Jun 99, for the purpose of 

avoiding your service as a Security Forces member, feign andlor exaggerate 
headaches. 

d.  It was made known, by matters you submitted to the Convening Authority, that 

you made a false statement, to wit: "I have also been carrying out my restriction to base 
since 15 Oct 99.. ..I ask that you take the time that I have been wearing my reduced 

Golden Lqacy, Boundless Future.. . Your Nation 's  Air Force 

SPCMO No. 5,  10 September 1999, was the last SPCMO of this headquarters 
published in FY99 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 
HEADQUARTERS 5TH BOMB WING 

MlNOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA 58705-5038 

Special Cou rt-Martial Order 
No. 1 

17 November 1999 

.----------------------------------------------- 
3  United States Air Force, 
AIRMAN FIRST CLASS i 
5th security Forces Squadron, was arraigned at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, on 
the following offenses at a court-martial convened by this headquarters. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

CHARGE I:  ARTICLE 107.  Plea:  NG.  Finding:  G. 

I.-..-.-..-..-....-- 

...................... 

Specification: In that, Airman First Class; -,----------------,, 
Security Forces Squadron, Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, did at or near Minot Air 
Force Base, North Dakota, on or about 3 June 1999, with intent to deceive make to 
Capti ---------------------- i  a physician with the sth Medical Group, an official statement, to 
wit:  "Tried Parafon and Motrin and not helping much" or words to that effect, which 
statement was false in that she had not tried the Parafon Forte, and was then known by 
her to be so false.  Plea: NG.  Fidding:  G. 

:  United States Air Force, 5Ih 

CHARGE II:  ARTICLE 115,  Plea:  NG.  Finding:  G. 

Specification: In that, Airman First Class: -.-..-.-..-..-....- 
Security Forces Squadron, Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, did, at or near Minot Air 
Force Base, North Dakota from on or about 1 June 1999 to about 21 June 1999, for the 
purpose of avoiding her service as a Security Forces member, feign and/or exaggerate 
headaches.  Plea: NG.  Finding:  G. 

j : United States Air Force, 5' 

SPCMO No. 1 

SENTENCE 

Sentence adjudged by officer and enlisted members on 15 October 1999: Hard labor 
without confinement for 60 days, forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 3 months, 
reduction to airman, and restriction to Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota for 30 days. 

In the case of Alf3MAN FIRST CLASS i-. .-. .. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-.-. .-. .-. .-. .-.-. .-. .-. .-, 
States Air Force, 5"  Security Forces Squadron, the sentence is approved and will be 
executed. 

: United 

ACTION 
-----------------------------------------------. 

.......................................................... 
Commander 

FOR T Y O M M A N D E R  
.-------- 

.......................................... 

-  ....................... 
,,$ taff Judge ~ d v o w  

---  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a  

,L-. 

\ 

: 5 SFS, 330 Tanker Trail, Minot AFB, ND  58705 (ACC) 

: 5 CES, 320 Peacekeeper Place, Minot AFB, ND  58705 

.------------------. 
1 -  AmnL ..................... 
1 - Lt Coli ..-..-....-..-..-..--:# 
(PRES) 
1 - Lt Col : b....-..-..-..-..-.-..-. ; AF LSNJAJT3, Central Circuit, Randolph AFB, TX  781 50 
- -' I-----------------------. 
,-..-. .. .-. .-. .-. .-. .. .-. .-. . 
(MJ) 
1 - Capt: . . - . . - . . - . - . . - . . - . . - - - - - - - - - I I  
!  5 BWIJA 300 Summit Drive, Suite 21 1, Minot AFB, ND 
58705 (TGl-------------------- 
1 - Mai. ; .-.-,-.,..-..-....---, 
58705 (ATC) 

: 5 BWIJA 300 Summit Drive, Suite 21 1, Minot AFB, ND 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00342

    Original file (FD2003-00342.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the applicant’s punitive discharge by Special Court Martial was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis as an act of clemency for change of discharge. Finding: Not Guilty, but Guilty of Violation of Article 130. 4 at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, on or about 17 Specification: Did, June 1989, in the nighttime.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00256

    Original file (FD2005-00256.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and four Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of thc discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. MATTERS SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT: On 7 Dec 04, A1 ~ i - - - - - - - ' :was given the opportunity to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00468

    Original file (FD2006-00468.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    iAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 GRADE 1 AIC 1 AFSNISSAN .--------------. AF FM 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, 3 Feb 99 5. AF FM 1 168, Statement of A1 C ;:::i, : 20 Jul99 17.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00355

    Original file (FD2005-00355.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. Art 15's: (1) 27 Sep 95, Minot AFB, ND - Article 92. You were given an LOR, 13 Sep 93. e. Between on or about 15 Jun 93 and on or about 25 Aug 93, you did, at or near Minot Air ; You were given Force Base, North Dakota, commit sexual harassment toward; L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , an LOR, 13 Sep 93. Military legal - - counsel I have made an appointment for you to consult C a p t a ~ office, 300 Summit Drive, Room 306A, a t u hours,in- counsel at your own expense.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00330

    Original file (FD2006-00330.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00361

    Original file (FD2005-00361.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also received three Letters of Reprimand for disobeying a lawful order, making a false official statement and dereliction of duty; three Letters of Counseling for sleeping on duty, financial irresponsibility and reporting late to training; a Letter of Admonishment for failure to go to appointed place of duty; and a Record of Individual Counseling for misconduct. Attachment: Examiner's Brief - DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD -----------------------. (Change...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00048

    Original file (FD2003-00048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00048 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ee (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. Appeals for Honorable Discharge, to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. (Atch 8-9) e. On or about 12 Feb 00, you were posted on stand-by for “D” Flight security duties.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0049

    Original file (FD2002-0049.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2002-0049 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. At the time of the discharge, applicant consulted counsel but failed to submit a statement in his own behalf. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: Upon discharge from the Air Force, I was informed that year, my General Discharge under Honorable Conditions would be upgraded to Honorable Discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0073

    Original file (FD2002-0073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Commission of a Serious Offense. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0073 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ES (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) 1, MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 96/01/03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.52 (Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense). 02/06/04/ia Pp2edz2- C075 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 319%H AIR RECUELING WING...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00282

    Original file (FD2006-00282.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASL NUMBER FD-2(,06-00282 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable The applicant requested a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRR) and was scheduled for an appearance on 19 April 2007 at Andrews AFB, MD, but he did not keep the appointment or call to reschedule. The Board finds the...