NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME OF COIJNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
X
RECORD REVIEW
AOORFSS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
1 GRADE
AB
1 AFSNISSAN
:.-..-..-....-..-.m
- --
X*
X *
X*
X *
X*
1
2
3
4
EXHIBITS SIJBMITTED TO THE BOARD
ORlIl-,It API'OINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF IJISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSb1,'S REI.EASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITI I 13 A I
PERSONAL APl'rARANC't
I IMb O F
C-.-..-..-..-..-..---------m
r l P E UOTH
CaVNs&b ,
YES
Nu
X
I
I
1
ISSUES
A94.05
INDLX NUMBhK
A67.00
HEARINC DATE
CASE NUMBER
25 Jan 2007
APPLICAYT'S ISSLE AKD THE ROARD'S DECI$lONAL R4TIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
FD-2006-00120
I
I
I
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counscl, and the right to si~bnlit an
application to the AFBCMR
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
* Reason & Authority
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C - J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .
111'
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
1CANIIOI.PI I AFH, 'fX 781 50-4742
INDORSEMENT
w
, ,. ",...
LYC,.,.
DATE: 2/6/2007
SEC'RElAHY 01: I'HE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COhlMAND DR, EE WING,3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB. MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL KATIONALE
CASL N l l M R F R
FD-2006-UU120
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general and to change the reason and
authority for the discharge.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FlNDINGS: Upgrade of discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge are denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated thc applicant
received two Letters of Reprimand and was found guilty of three charges by a Special Court Martial for
misconduct. The Special Court Martial Board found the member guilty for failure to go to appointed place
of duty; for being derelict in the performance of duty by allowing a person under the age of 18 in his
dormitory room; failing to refrain from allowing a guest to sleep in his dormitory room; and by commiting
the offense of carnal knowledge. He was punished with a reduction in grade to Airman Basic, 4 months
confinement and required to be identified as a "Sex Oflender". Applicant was administratively discipliiled
with two Letters of Reprimand for being late for duty and failure to go. The DRR opined that through these
administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board
concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. 'She
characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there cxists no legal or equitablc basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH AMN)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recld a UOTHC Disch fr USAF Anderson AFB, Guam on
1 Apr 05 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50 (Pattern of Misconduct). Appeals for General
Discharge, and to Change the Reason for Discharge.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 2 Oct 84. Enlmt Age: 18 7/12. Disch Age: 20 5/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-67, E-66, G-50, M-32. PAFSC: 3M031 - Services Apprentice.
DAS: 19 May 04.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 14 May 03 - 12 Jan 04 (7 months 29 days) (Inactive).
3 .
SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 13 Jan 04 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 02 Mo 19 Das, of which
AMS is 00 Yrs 10 Months 19 Days (excludes 4 months lost time).
b. Grade Status: AB - 13 Dec 04 (SPCM, 29 Nov 04)
AIIUI - 13 J u ~ 04
c. Time Lost: 29 Nov 04 thru 29 Mar 05 ( 4 months).
d . Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: LOR, 24 AUG 04 - Late for duty.
LOR, 07 SEP 04 - Failure to go.
f. CM: Special Court Martial - 29 Nov 04
CHARGE I: Article 86. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification I: Did, at or near Andersen AFB, Guam, on or about
4 Nov 04, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to
your appointed place of duty, to wit: Building 21000. Plea:
Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 2: Did, at or near Andersen AFB, Guam, on or about
16 Nov 04, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to
your appointed place of duty, to wit: Building 17002. Plea:
Guilty. Finding: Guilty,
CHARGE 11: Article 92. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty
Specification I: Who knew or should have known of his duties at
or near Andersen AFB, Guam, on divers occasions between on or
about 5 Jul 04 and on or about 7 Jul 04, was derelict in the
performance of those duties in that he willfully failed to refrain
from allowing A.C.W., a person under the age of 18, in his
dormitory room, as it was his duty to do. Plea: Guilty. Finding:
Guilty .
Specification 2: Who knew or should have known of his duties at
or near Andersen AFB, Guam, on or about 7 Jul 04, was derelict in
the performance of those duties in that he willfully failed to
refrain from wrongfully allowing a guest, A.C.W., to sleep in his
dormitory room, as it was his duty to do. Plea: Guilty. Finding:
Guilty.
CHARGE 111: Article 120. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification: Did, at or near Andersen AFB, Guam, on divers
occasions between on or about 6 Jul 04 and on or about 7 Jul 04,
commit the offense of carnal knowledge with A.C.W, Plea: Guilty.
Finding: Guilty. Sentence adjudged 29 Nov 04. Reduction to AB
and 4 months confinement. "SEX OFFENDER NOTIFICATION REQUIRED."
g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs: AFOUA, NDSM, BMTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (06) Mos (18) Das
TAMS: (00) Yrs (LO) Mos (19) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 24 Mar 06.
(Change Discharge to General, and Change the Reason for Discharge)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
(Please read /nst~ct/ons on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE comptetlng this appficntion.)
Form ~ p p r o v e d
oMB NO. 07Oe.0604
~xp~rres ~ u g 31,2006
The plbR.3 mportlnp burdm fur tNe d e d o n of InforrnaUm Is ortlrmUd to mvmmflo 30 minUa.8 pu nrponu. inelualng fhm Umr for nvlmwlng in-Ions.
dam rcummr.
whHino and mlriulnln~ the dam n r d u l ~d wrnp1md.w md m*whp tho aoMmdon of Infmation. Sand oommonta mgardlno rh* burden m u or any whet upmat of thb -ll*ctim
of Infnmatl~. indudno wawrtlons for wdudnm th* burdrn, to dm h . n r d Oafonr. Eucutlvo S.rvk.4 md Ccnununicarbna Dlmutontm (0704-00041. RmndmnU rhovld b* rwmn
d to any pw.hyfor f.ilfng to cam ly wkh a colmctbn of Intormmdon If It d o u not dr4.y r aumndy valid OM0
nacwhhmndw MY othmr pmvWon of law, na porwn .hall br
mrehlna m&g
WSE Do NOT RETURN You= F o m t o &E
oRommTIoN. &URN c o w m m FORM To
A-mIATE
I Zvd -8.
I BACK OF THIS PAOE.
AUTHORITY: 10 U.S.C. 1653: E.O. 9397.
PRINCIPAL PURWSEBI: To abply for s change In the&araeterlzation or reason for rnilitav discharge issued to an hdivldual.
ROUTINE USE(S): None.
DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure to provide ldentifylng Information may Impede processing of this application. The request for
Social Sscuritv Number is strictlv to assure Prorrer Identification of the Individual and a ~ ~ r o ~ r i a t a
1. APPUCANT DATA rrhe person whose discharge is to be reviewed). PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.
.. .
records.
. .
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
A w R E S ~ ON I
I
I
be -!kt: -??!,-!MY? I??!!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I a. 6RAOElRANK AT D l S W R Q E
1 d. SOCIAL SECURrfY NUM-
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-IV
dsra Lemsre t h p n ~ a m e -
ago, SUM w DD krm, 1491
.
I I
If M v y dcammtllb or d W m w d s am mhvant to your case, plnw u n d cop!e#./
X
-- ,- -. .-,
9. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED (X anel
r OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONNEL F U AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
* /--~~n*aM~sentat/vr) WILL NOT APPEAR BEFORe THE BOARD.
WlSk
/ v s )
WNWCT A RECORD REVIE\II
S U g m BY
I AND/OR ~ ~ 8 n t 0 t
W A S H W O K D*C. METROWWAN AREA.
I AND/OR ~ e w t m h p m a n r a t ~ l r a ~ W8H T 0 A P W AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE O O W W U E M -FIE
IsmM chy and rtatd
I TO APPEAR AT A HEARlNQ AT NO EXPENSE T 0 W E OOVERNMENT EEFOFIE THE BOAR0 IN We
[NOTE Tho llkvy D k a h p . M w Borrd daea nor ham
I M D I O I . ,-,..--
10.a. COUNSEWFIEPRESENTA~E Ilf any) NAME [mr. Fm, Middle InhIaI) AND ADDRESS I b. TeLWIQNt NWBER1Inchnie A Am# Coda1
A T R A M M G PAWEL C L O W TO
fnwYllO mnd.1
I
11. APPLICANT MUST SIGN I N ITEM 13.0. B€LOW.
If the record In qvcltlon It that of a doceaaed or incompotont p o r n . LEOAL PROOF OF
DEATH OR INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. If the applluflon Ir ilgnod by othrir them the qpqcant, lndlcate
the name ~prhrtl
and rdrtionrhb by marking a box below.
I
I
13. CERTIFICATION.
I make the foregoing stateman&, as part of my cWm, with full ktmMrd e of tho
pandthm Invohrad for willfully making a false rtatmmnt or claim.. (U.S. Cod@, Titie 18, Sect%ns 287
and 1001, prwfde that an Indhrldual shall be f f ~ d under this tMe or impn'soned not mws than 5 years,
or both.)
CASE NUMBER
/Do not write in this space.)
.
:A. S!CNA.V.E t A E C ~ U I R E D ~ & A E ~ ! ~ . ~ ~ H ~ F ~
in Itam 11 above)
d. FAX NUMBER Ihdude Ama Codel
I
1
DD FORM 293, WAR 2004'
.
.
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLEI%.
b. DATE SIGNED - REQUIFiED
a 0 0 -MaiQZ
IYYWMMDD)
I
I
Page 1 of 4 Pages
arc char^ 2
-1.
. -..--.-I.--_--1
-.-I-
...
. -.... , ... - .__ I.. .-.---.- ..* ..--- _
-.-- - -.*.-.-
..-.- ......---
-...--.-.-
-- --.-
36TH SERVICES SQUADRON (PACAF)
UNIT 140(LI, APO AP 96S434004
FROM: 36 SVSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge fiom the United States Air Force for Misconduct,
specifically A Pattern of Misconduct, according to AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph
5.50. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority to support this
recommendation are attached.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On 2 1 August 2004, you reported to duty 45 minutes late. For your actions, you
received a Letter of Reprimand dated 24 August 2004. (Atch 1)
b. On 6 September 2004, you failed to report to duty. For your actions, you received
a Letter of Reprimand dated 7 September 2004. (Atch 2)
c. On 29 Nov 2004, you were convicted in a special court-martial of the following offenses:
(1) On or about 4 November 2004, without authority, you failed to go at the time
prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: Building 2 1000.
(2) On or about 16 November 2004, without authority, you failed to go at the time
prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: Building 17002.
(3) On divers occasions between on or about 5 July 2004 and on or about 7 July 2004, you
were derelict in the performance of your duties in that you willfully failed to refrain from allowing
a person under the age of 18 in your dormitory room, as it was your duty to do.
(4) On or about 7 July 2004, you were derelict in the performance of your duties in that
you willfully f ~ l e d to refiain from wrongfully allowing a guest to sleep in your dormitory room, as
it was your duty to do.
(5) On divers occasions between on or about 5 July 2004 and on or about 7 July 2004, you
committed the offense of carnal knowledge.
For these offenses you were court-martialed on 29 November 2004. The military judge
found you guilty of all violations alleged and sentenced you to a Bad Conduct Discharge, four
months confinement, and reduction to the grade of E-1 , On 18 January 2005, the Special Court
Martid Convening Authority (SPCMCA) approved your sentence in part, authorizing confinement
for four months and reduction to Airman Basic. (Atchs 3 and 4)
>
a
3. This action could result in your separation with an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. I am recommending that you receive an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. The commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction or a higher authority will
make the final decision in this matter. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for
reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be denied enlistment in any component of the
armed forces and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be subject to
recoupment
4. You have the right to:
a. Consult legal counsel;
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board;
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing;
d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the board hearing; and
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making a decision to
waive any of your rights.
5. You must report to the 36th Medical Operations Squadron, Physical Exams Section, with your
medical records on hand, for a review of these records immediately. You do not need an
appointment. They will decide whether you need a complete physical examination or a family
practice appointment. If an examination is required, tell the doctor you need a "separation"
physical examination.
..-..-....-..-..-..-..-..-
.-..-..-..-..-..-..-------
: Andersen Area Defense Counsel, DSN
>
6. Military legal counsel, Captain!
366-2281, has been obtained to assist you. An appointment has been scheduled for you to
consult with him at his ofice on 18 Feb 05 at 1430 hours. Instead of the appointed counsel, you
may have another lawyer, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is
reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201, Administration of Military Justice.
In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force
does not pay expenses incident to the employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if
employed, must be readily available
7. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within 7 workdays, by 25 Feb 05, specifying
the rights you choose to exercise. The statement must be signed in the presence of your counsel,
who will also sign it. If you waive your right to a hearing before an administrative discharge
board, you,may submit written statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements to the
discharge authority with the case file to be considered with this recommendation. If you fail to
respond, your failure will constitute a waiver of the right to the board hearing.
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use with your Commander's Support Staff (CSS).
Please return it to the CSS upon your completion.
9. If you request a board and you fail to appear without good cause, your failure to appear
constitutes a waiver of your right to be present at the hearing.
10. If you received advanced educational assistance, special pay or bonuses, and have not
completed the period of active duty you agreed to serve, you may be subject to recoupment.
Where recoupment is dependent on a finding that the separation is voluntary or because of
misconduct, the discharge board (or the separation authority if the board is waived) will make a
specific written finding whether the misconduct constitutes a basis for recoupment.
1 1. Execute the attached acknowledgement and return it to me immediately.
Commander
4 Attachments:
1. Letter of Reprimand, dated 24 August 2004
2. Letter of Reprimand, dated 7 September 2004
3. AF Form 1359, dated 29 November 2004
4. SPCMCA action, dated 18 January 2005
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00051
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Svd: 2 Yrs 2 Mo 7 Das, of which AMS is 2 yrs 0 months 10 days (excludes 1 month 27 days lost time). Specification 1: Did, at or near Anderson AFB, Guam, on or about 4 Apr 98, unlawfully strike -in his hand.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0049
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2002-0049 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. At the time of the discharge, applicant consulted counsel but failed to submit a statement in his own behalf. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: Upon discharge from the Air Force, I was informed that year, my General Discharge under Honorable Conditions would be upgraded to Honorable Discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00430
ISSUE: Applicant received General discharge for Pattern of Misconduct--Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline Applicant contends that his discharge was a premature act by his commander and his commander failed to act in his time of need specifically to be readmitted into ADAPT program. The records indicate that the applicant received two Article 15s, a Letter o r Reprimand and two Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct including late for duty, drinking under the age of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00145
ISSUE: Applicant acknowledged that his actions were wrong and that he had a problem with alcohol. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD . Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00070
1 * ' AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD H EARTNG RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20162-7002 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL KATIONAIJE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00070 GENERAL: Tlle applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, changc the reason and authority for the discharge, and change the reenlistment code. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00037
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME O F SERVICE MEMRKH (LAST, FIRST hI1L)L)I.E IN1 I'IAI,) .................... MU 20761.7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD UEClSIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2007-00037 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00502
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REMEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS APB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00502 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00201
Member received an Article 15, a vacation of suspended punishment, two Letters of Counseling, a Letter of Reprimand, and pursuant to his guilty pleas, was convicted by Summary Court Martial for various acts of misconduct. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. Applicant's Issues.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00480
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's discharge was too harsh and approved an upgrade of discharge to General. Specification: In that ss9t : ......................... :, ' USAF, 11 CS, Bolling AFB, DC, who knew or should have known of her duties within the continental US, on divers occasions, between on or about 16 Jul 2004 and on or about 23 Jul 2004, was derelict in the 1 2 DEC - . APPLICANT DATA (The p m n whose discharge is...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0487
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD02-0487 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. 4, 14 Dec 89) SGT - 2 6 Jun 8 9 (Article 1 5 , 2 6 Jun 89) c. Time Lost: 46 Days (1 O c t - 5 Oct 89 & 10 Oct-19 Nov 89) d. Art 15's: (1) 26 Jun 89, Nellis AFB, NV - Article 111. at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, on or about 9 June 1889, operate a vehicle, to w i t : a piqkup truck, while drunk, as evidenced by an Article 15 dated 26 Jpne IQ&Q,...