I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FlKST MII)I)L,E INl.fIAI,)
I
I
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
AMN
1 X I
I
RECORDREVLEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANUATlON OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
HON
V O T E O r m mmv4
I GG 1 - - ~ G T ~ c (
OTHER
v; $
I
DENY
TYPE GEN
CoUNSEL
YES
NU
I
-
-
-
-
ISSUES
A92.21
INDEX NUMBER
A60.00
A01.43
1
2
3
4
1
I
ORDER APPOINTING TIIF. I30ARU
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF L)ISC:RAKGE
I.ElI'ER OF NCYI'IFICATION
I3RIF.F OF I'ERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S IUZLEASE TO '1'1 IF, I3OARD
ADDITIONAI, EXI IIHITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEAMNCE
'I'AI'E RECORDTNG OF PERSONAL APPEAMNCE HE
HI?AHINC IlA'l'lS
CASE NUMBER
12 Oct 2006
4PPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAI. RATIONAI ARE DISC ('SSRD ON THF ATTA(UP11 AIR FORCE DISCHAROE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATlON.UE
FD-2006-00123
Case lieard in Washington, D.C..
The applicant was scheduled for a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board at Andrews AFB, Maryland, but failed
to appear or notify the board.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to subinit a11 application to the AFBCMR
Names and votes will be made available to tlic applicant at tlic applicanl's request.
X - Upgrade, Reason and Authority and RE Code
A
f l -
/ v I
I
TO.
SAFIMKBR
550 C STREET WES'I', SUI'I'F, 40
IZANDOI.PII AFD, TX 78150-4742
IN WRSEMEhT
FROM:
I
DATE: 10/12/200(i
SECWl'ARV DFTHE AIR F O R m PERSONNEL COUNClL
AIR FORLT. ~ I S C H A ~ ( : E REVIEW mmn
1535 CaMMANU UK, EE WING, 3RD FUXlR
ANnREWS AFB, M D ZU7bZ-7UUZ
MIIQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will bc uscd
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2006-00123
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for
the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was scheduled for a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRR) at Andrews
Air Force Base, Maryland, but failed to appear or notify the Board.
No exhibits were submitted on the applicant's behalf.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment
code are denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: The applicant cited his eagerness to serve again, "especially in this time of recruitment crisis and [the]
war overseas," in documenting his desire for an upgrade of discharge so that he may enlist in the United States
Marine Corps. He otherwise did not submit any issues questioning the equity or propriety of the non-judicial
punishment actions he received or the resultant discharge action. Specifically, the applicant received two Article
15s during his term of enlistment, covering a period from on or about 9 July 1993 until his date of discharge on
20 May 1997. The first Article 15, issued on 29 April 1996, was for unlawfully striking another Airman in the
head with a bottle. For this offense the applicant received a suspended reduction in grade to Airman and 15 days
extra duty. The second Article 15, issued on 28 March 1997, contained two specifications; one for wrongfully
wearing, without authority, the rank of Senior Airman insignia over a several month period (from on or about 9
July 1996 to 4 February 1997) and his dishonorable failure to pay an indebtedness on his government travel card
of the amount of $240.03. The applicant's record does not contain the notification memorandum fiom his
commander, the review of legal sufficiency, nor his responses to either of the Article 15s or the discharge action.
The DRB recognized the fact that the applicant had served three years and 10 months, oi' a four-year term of
enlistment before his discharge was initiated and that he had achieved three consecutive overall "4" enlisted
performance reports. Additionally, the Board acknowledged the likelihood that the applicant is making a
significant contribution to the life and safety of his community, as an "LAC0 fire fighter." However, the Board
was deprived of an opportunity to receive any objective evidence upon which to base an upgrade of the
applicant's discharge, either through supplemental written documentation, such as letters of recornmendation or
commendation, proof of his alleged "unblemished record" with his current employer, or testimony that would
otherwise overcome a presumption of regularity in the processing of his discharge. The Board concluded that the
characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, that it was within the discretion of the
discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
?
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MI3
(Former AMN) (HGH A1C)
DISCHARGE CASE MISSING
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Rppl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF McGuire AFB NJ on 20 May
97 UP AFI 36-3208, Para 5.50 (Misconduct). Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and
to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 7 Oct 73. Enlmt Age: 19 4/12. Disch Age: 23 7/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A - 5 8 ,
Apprentice. DAS: Unknown.
E-50, G-50, M-65. PAFSC: IT131 - Aircrew Life Support
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 25 Feb 93 - 08 Jul 93 (4 months 14 days) (Inactive).
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 9 Jul 93 for 4 years. Svd: 03 Yrs 10 Mo 12 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: Amn - 28 Mar 97 (Article 15, 28 Mar 97)
A1C - 09 Nov 94
Amn - 09 Jan 94
c. Time Lost: None
d. Art 1 5 ' s : (1) 28 Mar 97, McGuire AFB, NJ - Article 134. You did, on
divers occasions between on or about 9 Jul 96 to on or
about 4 Feb 97, wrongfully and without authority wear
upon your uniform the insignia or grade of a Senior
Airman. You, being indebted to American Express in the
total sum of $240.03 for cash advances, charges and
advance fees, which amount became due and payable on or
about 1 Nov 96, did within the territorial limits of the
US from on or about 1 Nov 96 to on or about 17 Feb 97,
dishonorably fail to pay said debt. Reduction to Amn,
45 days extra duty and restriction within the confines
of McGuire AFB/Ft Dix for 45 days. (Appeal/Denied) (No
mitigation)
(2) 2 9 Apr 96, McGuire AFB, NJ - Article 128. You did, on
or about 17 Mar 96, unlawfully strike AlC n
-in
to Amn and 15 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
the head with a bottle. Suspended reduction
e. Additional: Unknown.
f . CM: None
g . Record of SV: 09 Jul 93 - 08 Mar 95 McGuire AFB 4 (Initial)
09 Mar 95 - 31 Dec 95 McGuire AFB 4 (CRO)
0 1 J a n 96 - 14 Jun 96 McGuireAFB 4 (CRO)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFOUA W/1 OAK LEAF CLUSTER.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (04) Yrs (02) Mos (26) Das
TAMS: (03) Yrs (10) Mos (12) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 28 Mar 0 6 .
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge.
Issue 1: I am requesting an upgrade in order to enlist in the Marine Corps
(per recruiter request). I am eager to serve again, especially in this time of
recruitment. crisis & the war overseas. I have been an LAC0 Fire Fighter with an
unblimshed (sic) record since my discharge.
ATCH
None
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00098
The applicant was administratively disciplined for losing his military identification card on four separate occasions, financial irresponsibility, and dereliction of duty. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I feel my discharge was inequitable considering my dedicated service up until my last year of service.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0431
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0431 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Reenld as SSgt 5 Jan 83 for 4 yrs.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00017
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE I CASENUMBER FD-0 1 -000 17 GENERAL: The applicant appealed for upgrade of his discharge frombailreofiduct to h6-k applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at Andrews AFB, MD, on April 5,2001. Issue 2 : At the time of my court martial, the Base Commander was more likely to approve a "bad conduct" discharge or worse then receive approve lesser punishment. Issue 3: Out of the eight Air...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00386
I " ' - - SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COLNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, M D 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00386 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general. The records indicated the applicant was financially irresponsible...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0560
T CONCLUSIONS: The board concludes there is no legal or equitable basis to upgrade or change the applicant’s discharge or re-cnlistment code, Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2001-0560 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD Jeni hipes (Former A1lC) (HGH Aic) ae 1. The commander recommended the respondent be separated from the Air Force with a General Discharge without Probation and Rehabilitation (P&R). For the Government: A preponderance of the evidence...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0372
A91.05 A91.00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 3, | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE [3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 03-01-24 FD2002-0372 COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING APPLICANT’S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE, REMARKS Case heard at Washington,...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0355
The records indicated the applicant received three Article 15’s for misconduct. b. Grade Status: AB - 10 Jul 98 {Article 15, 10 Jul 98) SRA - 15 Apr 98 (Article 15, Vacation, 29 May 98) SSGT - 1 Oct 96. c. Time Lost: 18 May 98 thru 26 May 98 (9 days). The respondent had two instances of negligent dereliction of duty, he made two false official statements, he committed one failure to go, two failures to obey and he was absent from his unit, all within the last nine months, and all since his...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00328
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's characterization of discharge inequitable. ISSUE: Applicant received a general discharge for misconduct - minor disciplinary infractions Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and the DRB concurred. Although the records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, four Letters of Reprimand, three k t t e r s of Counseling, four Records of Individual...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00024
I had been in the Air Force for three years and 3 months when this particular Sgt accused me of misconduct. For this, you were formally counseled. Letter of Counseling (LOC), 18 Oct 99 .
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00380
~ ~ ' 2 ~ 7 6 2 - 7 1 ~ 2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NLlMBER FD-2006-00380 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SSGT) 1. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SSgt 2 Feb 96 for 6 years, Svd: 02 Yrs 02 Mo 23 Das, all AMS .