NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (IAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI,)
GRADE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIE\\' BOARD HEARING RECORD
rYPE GEN
I
I
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
AB
I
I
IX
RECORDREVIEW
NAME OE COUNSEL A h D OR ORGANIWTION
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES
No
X
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
'kg.
8 %
HON
I
s VOTE OF THF'BOA@Jl : -
GEN
I UOTHC
OTHER
I DENY
ISSUES
A93.17
INDEX NULIBER
It66.00
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
I
1
2
3
4
I
. . EXHLBITS SUSMlTTED TO THE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRlEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
09 Nov 2005
M P L I C W S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
I
I
I FD-2005-00193
I
I
I
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
SIGNATURE OF RECORDER
LMDA F BROWER, MSGT, %AF
RANDOLPH AFB. TX 78150-4742
ANDREWS AFB, MD 10762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE KEVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2005-00193
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by applicant substantiates an
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because certain statements gathered were written
under false pretenses that those involved who cooperated with local authorities would not serve any jail time,
when in fact, all those involved (with the exception of the applicant) were convicted and served time in
prison. Additionally, the member states he submitted to a urinalysis that came up clean and permitted a
search of his domicile which showed no signs of possession. The records indicated the applicant received
three Article 15s. His misconduct included wrongfully allowing a civilian to sleep in his dorm room,
underage drinking, and wrongful use of marijuana. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant
departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by
the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH AMN)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Randolph AFB, TX on 18 Jul 02
UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.54 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 14 Jul 81. Enlmt Age: 18 7/12. Disch Age: 21 0/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-74, E-68, G-55, M-60. PAFSC: 2E031 - Ground Radar Systems
Apprentice. DAS: 18 May 01.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 26 Feb 00 - 13 Jun 00 (3 months 18 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 14 Jun 00 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 1 Mo 5 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AB - 12 Oct 01 (Article 15, 12 Oct 01)
Amn - 14 Dec 00
c. Time Lost: None
d. Art 15's: (1) 28 May 02, Spangdahlem AB, Germany - Article 112a. You
did, at or near Maastricht, The Netherlands, between on
or about 1 Oct 01 and on or about 31 Oct 01, wrongfully
use marijuana. Fourteen days restriction, and 14 days
extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
(2) 12 Oct 01, Spangdahlem AB, Germany - Article 92. You
did, between on or about 1 Aug 01 and on or about 15 Sep
01, fail to obey a lawful general regulation, to wit:
paragraph 3.1.5, SABI 32-6001, dated 4 May 01, by
wrongfully permitting
dormitory room. Reduction to AB. Fifteen days
restriction, and 15 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
to sleep in your
(3) 29 Jan 01, Keesler AFB, MS - Article 92. You, who knew
of your duties, on or about 15 Dec 00, were derelict in
the performance of those duties in that you willfully
failed to abide by Second Air Force Phase Program
restrictions, by failing to refrain from drinking
alcoholic beverages while under age 21, as it was your
duty to do. Further, you, who knew of your duties, on
or about 15 Dec 00, were derelict in the performance of
those duties in that you willfully failed to abide by
Second Air Force Phase Program restrictions, by failing
to refrain from consuming alcoholic beverages while in
the 338 Training Squadron dorms, as it was your duty to
do. Forfeiture of $584.00 pay per month for 2 months.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 14 Jun 00 - 14 Feb 02 Spangdahlem AB 2 (1nitial)REF
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (2) Yrs (4) Mos (23) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (1) Mos (5) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 6 May 05.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: The statements that were gathered were written under false
pretenses that those involved who cooperated with local authorities would not
serve any jail time. When in fact, all those involved were convicted, excluding
myself, and sentenced to serve a required amount of time in prison. The sole
reason I was ever implicated with any kind of involvement, was purly based on an
corroboration of statements that were entirely based on false pretenses. During
the investigation I did all that was asked by authorities, I submitted a
urinalysis that came up clean (negative) for any signs of drug abuse, and also
permitted a search of my domicile, that also showed-no signs of possession nor
abuse.
ATCH
None.
MEMORANDUM FOR Al3
FROM: 606 ACSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Letter
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Drug Abuse. The
authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54. If my
recommendation for discharge is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable or
general (under honorable conditions). I am recommending that your service be characterized as
general (under honorable conditions).
2. My reason for this action is: Between on or about 1 Oct 01 and 3 1 Oct 01, you wrongfully
used marijuana. For this infraction, you received Article 15 Nonjudicial Punishment on 28 May
0 1. Your punishment included 14 days restriction, and 14 days extra duty (Atch 1).
3. Although the basis for this discharge is Drug Abuse, the following derogatory information is
relevant in characterizing your service.
a. On or about 15 Dec 00, you were derelict in the performance of duties in that willfully
failed to refrain from drinking alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21. For this
infraction, you received Article 15 Nonjudicial Punishment on 29 Jul01. Your punishment
included forfeiture of $584.00 pay per month for 2 months and an Unfavorable Information
File was created (Atch 2 & 3).
b. Between on or about 1 Aug 01 and 15 Sep 01, you failed to obey a lawfUl regulation by
wrongfblly permitting
sleep in your dormitory room. For this infraction,
you received Article 15 Nonjudicial Punishment on 12 Oct 01. Your punishment included
reduction to the grade of E-1 (Airman Basic), with a new date of rank of 12 Oct 01,15 days
restriction and 15 days extra duty (Atch 4).
4. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible
for re-enlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may
be subject to recoupment.
5. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
I have made an appointment for you with
, Spangdahlem Al3,
Germany, DSN 452-6607, on TBD at TBD hours. You may consult civilian counsel at your own
expense.
6. You have the right to submit statements on your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me within three duty days, unless you request and
receive an extension in writing for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation
authority.
7. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf within the time
period prescribed, it will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
8. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the 52d Medical
Group, PHYSICAL EXAMS ELEMENT on TBD at TBD hours. An appointment has also
been made at FAMILY PRACTICE on TBD at TBD hours.
9. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the Commander's Support Staff office.
10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Attachments:
1. AF Form 3070,28 May 02
2. UIF, 15 Dec 00
3. AF Form 3070,29 Jul0 1
4. AF Form 3070,12 Oct 01
5. Airman's Receipt of Notification Letter, located at Tab 2
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00502
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REMEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS APB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00502 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0496
TYPE GEN -PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION MEMBERS SITTING ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94.53, A93.19, A92.37 A67.10 HEARING DATE 12 JUN 03 CASE NUMBER FD2002-0496 REMARKS Case heard at Washington, D.C. AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN vOTHC OTHER DENY ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00393
3 H l ) F I O O R ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7W2 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00393 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH AlC) 1. J DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 520 FIGHTER WING (USAFE) Fp29&4373 3 0...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00230
In addition, he received three Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling, two Letters of Admonishment, and was placed on the Control Roster for dereliction do duty, failure to go, reporting in an unserviceable uniform, disobeying a lawful order, lying and being late for duty. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. To: The Air Force Discharge Review Board I am requesting a change in my discharge status.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00402
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, ~ l l 2 1 1 7 6 2 - ~ U U Z AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00402 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. b. Grade Status: AB - 18 Jun 01 (Vacation, 12 Jul 01) A1C - 14 May 99 Amn - 14 Jul 98 c. Time Lost: 30 Jul 00 - 10 Aug 00 (12 days) d. Art 15's: (1) 12 Jul 01, Vacation, Spangdahlem AB, GE - Article 92. (Change Discharge to...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00254
The records indicated the applicant received a Record of Individual Counseling for reporting late for duty, a Letter of Reprimand for dereliction of duty, a Letter of Reprimand for failure to pay just debt and an Article 15 for failure to obey and false official statements during a six month period. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 07 Sep 00 for 4 yrs. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00330
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00275
INDEX NUMBER FD-2003-00275 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SM/'MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D Q EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0516
(Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I was not given a proper discharge because on my discharge notification memorandum #2 item e it says on 16 Dec 01 I was arrested for an underage drinking charge when I hadn't. For this misconduct, you received a Record of Individual Counseling (RIC) dated 7 Nov 01. LOR dated 17 Oct 01 w/ UIF RIC dated 7 Nov 01 w/ UIF LOR dated 13 Dec 01 w/ UIF and Control Roster Article 15 dated 14 Jan 02 w/ UIF LOR dated 15 Feb 02 w/UIF LOR dated 15 Feb 02 w/UIF .
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00187
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0187 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change the Reason and Authority for discharge and to change the RE Code. (Atch 1-2) c. On or about 10 March 2001, you failed to refrain from drinking alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 and you physically controlled a vehicle while intoxicated. For your actions, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC).